本文選題：法律定義條款　切入點(diǎn)：現(xiàn)狀梳理　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：定義條款是不少法律中不可缺少的一部分,它們界定詞語的含義,把模糊和難以理解的概念解釋清楚。正確地對(duì)法律概念進(jìn)行定義以及用規(guī)范的語言將所界定的內(nèi)容表述出來不僅影響到我們對(duì)法律的理解,還關(guān)乎法律適用的準(zhǔn)確性,對(duì)此進(jìn)行研究是必須的。本文的研究目的有兩個(gè),一是梳理我國(guó)法律定義條款的現(xiàn)狀,盡可能全面的介紹定義條款在法律中運(yùn)用的情況;二是對(duì)定義條款的規(guī)范進(jìn)行初步的研究,指出法律定義條款存在的問題并提出相關(guān)的改善建議。 本文結(jié)構(gòu)包括緒論、主體四章、結(jié)語及附錄,在緒論部分,介紹了現(xiàn)有與法律定義條款相關(guān)的研究和本文運(yùn)用的研究方法,闡明了本文的研究對(duì)象與創(chuàng)新之處。現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)對(duì)法律定義的規(guī)則、方法、結(jié)構(gòu)研究較多,但對(duì)法律定義條款的規(guī)范和制定規(guī)則研究較少。這正是本文研究的緣起。 第一章“法律定義條款概述”,闡述了法律定義條款的概念、性質(zhì)、作用以及規(guī)范化問題。本章從法律定義的含義出發(fā),說明司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)法律概念含義的理解與審判的關(guān)系,從而指出法律定義條款的重要性;法律定義條款是不完全性法條需要結(jié)合其他法條才能得到適用;法律定義條款的功能主要有三個(gè):明確法律概念的內(nèi)涵和外延、確定法律的適用領(lǐng)域以及簡(jiǎn)化法律文本。定義條款的規(guī)范化問題是規(guī)范性文件起草者予以關(guān)注的一個(gè)問題。 第二章“我國(guó)法律定義條款的現(xiàn)狀梳理”。主要從分布位置、表述方式、定義對(duì)象和特點(diǎn)等分析我國(guó)法律定義條款的一些現(xiàn)狀,指出我國(guó)法律定義條款的位置分布在總則、正文和附則,定義條款的表述方式有很多種,定義的對(duì)象主要有兩種,我國(guó)法律定義和日常定義相比的獨(dú)特性。 第三章“我國(guó)法律定義條款存在問題分析”。針對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)法律定義條款中存在的一些語言與邏輯等方面的問題進(jìn)行了闡述,指出了3大問題,分別是:定義條款起草技術(shù)的欠缺、表述方式不規(guī)范、違反定義規(guī)則。這些問題的解決不是隨心所欲,立法是一件非常嚴(yán)肅的國(guó)家大事,法律是用來作為每個(gè)公民的行為規(guī)范的,法的語言也要符合基本的規(guī)范。 第四章“法律定義條款的制定與完善”。本文的最后一章談?wù)摿硕x條款的制定規(guī)則與完善,在設(shè)置時(shí)要考慮到有無必要對(duì)某個(gè)詞下定義,所給出的定義是否明確可供操作等原則性的規(guī)則,也要注意一些技術(shù)方面的制定規(guī)則,同時(shí)我們還列出了對(duì)定義條款進(jìn)行立法技術(shù)規(guī)制應(yīng)包括的幾個(gè)方面的建議。 最后本文總結(jié)了本項(xiàng)研究成果,對(duì)未來的研究進(jìn)行了展望,指出了現(xiàn)階段研究的不足以及后續(xù)可能的研究方向,并附錄了一些有關(guān)定義條款立法規(guī)范的文件。
[Abstract]:Definition clauses are an integral part of many laws that define the meaning of words, To define concepts that are vague and difficult to understand. To define legal concepts correctly and to express them in normative language affects not only our understanding of the law, but also the accuracy of its application. There are two purposes of this study. One is to sort out the current situation of the legal definition clause in our country and to introduce the application of the definition clause in the law as comprehensively as possible. The second is to carry on the preliminary research to the standard of the definition clause, point out the problems existing in the legal definition clause, and put forward the related improvement suggestion. The structure of this paper includes the introduction, the main body four chapters, the conclusion and the appendix. In the introduction part, it introduces the existing research related to the legal definition clause and the research methods used in this paper. This paper clarifies the research object and innovation of this paper. There are many researches on the rules, methods and structures of legal definition in the existing literature, but there are few studies on the norms and rules of legal definition clauses. This is exactly the origin of this study. The first chapter, "Overview of the legal definition clause", expounds the concept, nature, function and standardization of the legal definition clause. From the meaning of the legal definition, this chapter explains the relationship between the understanding of the meaning of the legal definition and the trial in the judicial practice. Thus, it points out the importance of the legal definition clause, the incomplete legal provisions and the combination of other legal provisions in order to be applied. The functions of the legal definition clauses are mainly three: to clarify the connotation and extension of the legal concept. It is a concern of the drafters of normative documents to determine the applicable areas of law and to simplify the legal texts. The second chapter, "the present situation of the legal definition clause in our country", mainly analyzes the present situation of the legal definition clause in our country from the distribution position, the expression way, the definition object and the characteristic, and points out that the position of the legal definition clause of our country is distributed in the general principle. There are many ways to express the definition clause in the main text and supplementary provisions, and there are two main objects of definition, the uniqueness of the legal definition and the daily definition in our country. The third chapter is "Analysis of the existing problems of the legal definition clause in our country". Some problems in language and logic in the current legal definition clause of our country are expounded, and three major problems are pointed out. They are: the lack of technical skills in drafting the definition clause, the non-standard formulation, and the violation of the definition rules. The solution to these problems is not arbitrary. Legislation is a very serious matter of state. The law is used as a standard of conduct for every citizen, and the language of law must conform to the basic norms. Chapter 4th, "formulation and perfection of legal Definitions". The last chapter of this paper discusses the rules and consummation of the definition clauses, and should consider whether it is necessary to define a certain word when setting up. Whether the definition is clear or not, we should pay attention to some technical rules. At the same time, we also put forward some suggestions for the legislative technical regulation of the definition clause. Finally, this paper summarizes the results of this study, looks forward to the future research, points out the shortcomings of the present research and the possible future research directions, and appends some documents concerning the legislative norms of the definition clauses.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李重奄;;從立法工作看法律語言規(guī)范化[J];江淮法治;2009年03期

2 朱金彩;;定義性法條之結(jié)構(gòu)初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年22期

3 張金興;試論法律定義的基本特征[J];法學(xué)探索.貴州省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1993年02期

4 王常龍;試論我國(guó)法律定義的特征[J];河北法學(xué);1987年04期

5 繆四平;法律定義研究[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

6 廖巧云;定義的認(rèn)知語用研究——一個(gè)元語言學(xué)問題探討[J];外語學(xué)刊;2005年05期

7 陶景侃;我國(guó)法律中的外延定義[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);1984年04期

8 呂正春;自然語言定義的種類和規(guī)則[J];齊齊哈爾師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年02期

9 周旺生;論法律援助法的總則構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2002年04期

10 馬保恩;;法律定義及其邏輯特征[J];商業(yè)文化;2010年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 項(xiàng)冶平;;立法技術(shù)要論[A];1997年政府法制研究報(bào)告[C];1997年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 法律和全球化研究中心主任 中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)法理學(xué)研究會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng) 朱景文;[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

2 甘肅政法學(xué)院 張建軍;[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

3 遼寧師范大學(xué)副教授 毛淑玲　中國(guó)人民大學(xué)教授 行為法學(xué)會(huì)法律語言研究會(huì)會(huì)長(zhǎng) 何家弘;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

4 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)法律語言研究中心副研究員 劉巧琳　徐慶勇;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 封鵬程;現(xiàn)代漢語法律語料庫(kù)的建立及其詞匯計(jì)量研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1631972