發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-13 05:37

  本文選題：司法解釋　切入點(diǎn)：司法解釋體制　出處：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：立法機(jī)關(guān)擁有立法權(quán),法律是由立法機(jī)關(guān)制定的；司法機(jī)關(guān)擁有憲法賦予的司法權(quán),其只能適用法律并無權(quán)制定法律的權(quán)力,當(dāng)司法機(jī)關(guān)審判具體的案例在在適用抽象的法律時(shí)即產(chǎn)生解釋的必要。從我國司法解釋體制的發(fā)展來看,專門從事司法解釋的機(jī)構(gòu)在我國古代還沒有發(fā)展起來,但司法解釋也發(fā)揮了不可忽視的作用。我國現(xiàn)有的司法解釋體制是在一定的歷史條件下發(fā)展起來的。無可置疑,我國現(xiàn)行的司法解釋與成文法起到了相輔相成的作用,在司法實(shí)踐中充分發(fā)揮了這一功能。然而我們也應(yīng)當(dāng)看到,隨著我國立法的不斷完善,在特定歷史條件下形成的司法解釋模式己經(jīng)不能適應(yīng)法治現(xiàn)代化的要求,我國現(xiàn)行的司法解釋存在解釋主體混亂,法、檢解釋效力矛盾等問題。在目前這種社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,大量法律法規(guī)出臺(tái),立法與實(shí)際操作之間的矛盾離不開司法解釋的狀況下,完善我國司法解釋體制的一個(gè)較好的對策便是構(gòu)建一元一級(jí)的司法解釋體制,實(shí)行判例指導(dǎo)制度。 本文認(rèn)為完善我國的司法解釋體制,構(gòu)建判例指導(dǎo)制度在我國是必要的和可行的。構(gòu)建判例指導(dǎo)制度既是改變大量抽象性的司法解釋存在的需要,也是司法審判與法律解釋不可分離性的需要；既是司法解釋正當(dāng)性證明的需要,也是提高法官適用法律時(shí)解釋法律的質(zhì)量和裁判效率的需要,同時(shí),司法解釋判例化又是具體解釋的最佳手段。在我國構(gòu)建判例指導(dǎo)制度具有可行性,既有歷史基礎(chǔ)也有現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。判例指導(dǎo)制度的建立在我國已經(jīng)相對的成熟,并有一定的基礎(chǔ),所以建立判例指導(dǎo)制度勢在必行。
[Abstract]:The legislature has legislative power, and the law is formulated by the legislature. The judiciary has the judicial power conferred by the Constitution, and it can only apply the law and has no right to make the law. When a specific case is tried by a judicial organ, the necessity of interpretation arises when the abstract law is applied. Judging from the development of the judicial interpretation system in China, the institution specializing in judicial interpretation has not yet developed in ancient China. However, judicial interpretation also plays an important role. The current judicial interpretation system in China has developed under certain historical conditions. There is no doubt that the current judicial interpretation and statutory law play a complementary role in our country. However, with the continuous improvement of our legislation, the judicial interpretation model formed under the specific historical conditions has been unable to meet the requirements of the modernization of the rule of law. There are some problems in the current judicial interpretation of our country, such as confusion of interpretation subject, law, contradiction of the effectiveness of inspection interpretation, etc. In the current social transition period, a large number of laws and regulations are issued, and the contradiction between legislation and actual operation cannot be separated from judicial interpretation. A better countermeasure to perfect the judicial interpretation system of our country is to construct the monolithic judicial interpretation system and carry out the system of judicial precedent guidance. This paper holds that it is necessary and feasible to perfect the judicial interpretation system of our country and to construct the guiding system of case law, which is the need of changing a large number of abstract judicial interpretations. It is also the need of the inseparability of judicial trial and legal interpretation, the need of proof of legitimacy of judicial interpretation, and the need to improve the quality of interpretation of law and the efficiency of adjudication when the judge applies the law, at the same time, The judicial interpretation precedent is the best means of concrete interpretation. It is feasible to construct the precedent guidance system in our country, which has both historical and realistic foundation. The establishment of the precedent guidance system has been relatively mature in our country and has a certain basis. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the system of precedent guidance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁明圣;司法解釋“立法化”現(xiàn)象探微[J];法商研究;2003年02期

2 陳興良;司法解釋功過之議[J];法學(xué);2003年08期

3 張勇;;規(guī)范性司法解釋在法律體系實(shí)施中的責(zé)任和使命[J];法學(xué);2011年08期

4 王玉青;;淺論我國司法審判中適當(dāng)“判例制度”的引進(jìn)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年23期

5 王寧;;從“許霆案”看我國刑法解釋權(quán)的分配[J];河北法學(xué);2009年03期

6 吳彬;付日亮;;淺析軍人婚姻特殊保護(hù)制度[J];湖南農(nóng)機(jī);2007年07期

7 季衛(wèi)東;;最高人民法院的角色及其演化[J];清華法學(xué);2006年01期

8 周旺生;中國現(xiàn)行法律解釋制度研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年02期

9 陳春龍;中國司法解釋的地位與功能[J];中國法學(xué);2003年01期

10 賀日開;司法解釋權(quán)能的復(fù)位與憲法的實(shí)施[J];中國法學(xué);2004年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 胡敏敏;論法律解釋權(quán)[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

2 王在福;刑法司法解釋若干問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1605081