本文選題：著作權(quán)法　切入點(diǎn)：客體　出處：《電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年08期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：近日,音樂噴泉案再度引發(fā)了對(duì)著作權(quán)客體擴(kuò)張問題的關(guān)注。盡管各國(guó)在著作權(quán)客體立法方面大都留有一定的彈性空間,但法院在法律適用時(shí)仍然頻頻面臨困境。許多創(chuàng)作不在著作權(quán)法明確列舉的作品范圍之內(nèi),如音樂噴泉、煙花秀、燈花秀、香水香味等,但都有是否將這些客體納入著作權(quán)法保護(hù)范圍的討論。這些將現(xiàn)代科技與思想情感表達(dá)融為一體的創(chuàng)作對(duì)立法、司法和行政執(zhí)法都提出了挑戰(zhàn)。要回答著作權(quán)客體擴(kuò)張是否適當(dāng)這一問題,就必須以著作權(quán)法的體系構(gòu)建為視角,綜合考慮經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、環(huán)境等因素,以確保擴(kuò)張結(jié)果符合著作權(quán)法在價(jià)值、目標(biāo)、利益平衡等方面的要求。
[Abstract]:Recently, the music fountain case has once again aroused concern about the expansion of copyright objects. Although most countries have some flexibility in the legislation of copyright objects, However, courts still often face difficulties in the application of the law. Many creations are outside the scope of works explicitly listed in the copyright Law, such as music fountains, fireworks displays, lanterns, perfumes, etc. However, there is a discussion on whether to bring these objects into the scope of protection of copyright law. In order to answer the question of whether the expansion of copyright object is appropriate, we must consider the economic, cultural and environmental factors from the perspective of the construction of copyright law system. To ensure that the expansion results meet the requirements of copyright law in terms of value, objectives, and balance of interests.
【作者單位】： 浙江工商大學(xué)法學(xué)院、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D923.41
，

本文編號(hào)：1604703