本文關(guān)鍵詞： 引誘侵權(quán) 幫助侵權(quán) 主觀意圖 教唆　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：版權(quán)法一方面通過保護版權(quán)權(quán)利促進文化的創(chuàng)造,另一方面通過限制版權(quán)責(zé)任鼓勵新技術(shù)的創(chuàng)新,在維護權(quán)利人、技術(shù)提供者與公眾之間的利益平衡中,力圖實現(xiàn)社會利益的最大化。然而,新技術(shù)的發(fā)展大大提高了個人的復(fù)制、傳播能力,使得版權(quán)人與新技術(shù)提供者之間的利益平衡不斷遭受挑戰(zhàn),版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則正是美國最高院試圖解決此利益沖突所確立的規(guī)則。 盡管我國與美國的版權(quán)制度因不同的法律體系、歷史發(fā)展而有所不同,但是促進創(chuàng)新之版權(quán)立法目的,維護版權(quán)人、技術(shù)提供商與公眾之間的利益平衡,以及實現(xiàn)社會利益的最大化這一最終目標并無實質(zhì)區(qū)別,且新技術(shù)的發(fā)展所帶來的挑戰(zhàn)和困境也是類似的。因而本文試圖通過對美國版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則的背景、最終確立和最新發(fā)展的研究,構(gòu)建版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則體系,以期對我國著作權(quán)制度的發(fā)展提供借鑒和參考。 第一章在介紹美國版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則的上位概念——版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任體系的基礎(chǔ)上,指出“引誘”最早是作為幫助侵權(quán)客觀行為表現(xiàn)之一出現(xiàn),但是,與幫助侵權(quán)規(guī)則在理論與實踐中不斷發(fā)展和完善所不同的是,引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則始終停留在理論層面,在實踐中幾乎沒有應(yīng)用,筆者對這一現(xiàn)象作了深入分析。 第二章詳細介紹了美國版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則確立的技術(shù)背景和法律背景。新技術(shù)(尤其是P2P技術(shù))的發(fā)展,將個人的復(fù)制與傳播能力推向了極致,打破了版權(quán)人與新技術(shù)提供者之間原先的利益平衡狀態(tài),最高院在Grokster案中意識到,單純地適用實質(zhì)性非侵權(quán)用途將導(dǎo)致對權(quán)利人不利的后果,在這一背景下,最終確立了版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則。 第三章通過對美國司法實踐中版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)案件的分析,試圖構(gòu)建引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則體系。版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則的構(gòu)成要件包括第三人的直接侵權(quán)行為和具有引誘他人實施侵權(quán)行為的主觀意圖兩方面,其中引誘意圖的認定是引誘侵權(quán)責(zé)任認定的關(guān)鍵;本文通過對Grokster案后所有涉及引誘侵權(quán)的案件的綜合分析,對認定引誘意圖的考量因素進行了類型化總結(jié),并對引誘侵權(quán)與幫助侵權(quán)的關(guān)系作了闡述。 第四章在對美國版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)制度全面分析的基礎(chǔ)上,回歸我國著作權(quán)制度,提出版權(quán)引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則在我國具有適用的理論基礎(chǔ),并指出我國法院在司法實踐中已然借鑒過引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則中的核心思想理論。
[Abstract]:Copyright law promotes the creation of culture by protecting copyright rights on the one hand, and encourages the innovation of new technologies by limiting copyright liability on the other, in order to maintain the balance of interests among the right holders, technology providers and the public. Seeking to maximize the benefits of society. However, the development of new technologies has greatly improved the ability of individuals to replicate and disseminate, and the balance of interests between copyright owners and providers of new technologies has been constantly challenged, The copyright inductive infringement rule is the rule established by the Supreme Court of America trying to resolve this conflict of interest. Although the copyright system in China and the United States is different because of different legal systems and historical development, the copyright legislation aims to promote innovation and maintain the balance of interests between copyright owners, technology providers and the public. And the ultimate goal of maximizing social benefits is no substantive difference, and the challenges and dilemmas brought about by the development of new technologies are similar. Finally, the establishment and the latest development research, constructs the copyright enticement infringement rule system, in order to provide the reference and the reference to our country copyright system development. The first chapter introduces the upper concept of American copyright inducement rules-the system of liability for copyright infringement, and points out that "inducement" appeared as an objective act of helping infringement at first, but, Different from helping tort rules to develop and perfect in theory and practice, the inductive tort rules always stay at the theoretical level, and almost have no application in practice. The author makes a deep analysis of this phenomenon. The second chapter introduces in detail the technical background and legal background of the establishment of copyright inductive infringement rules in the United States. The development of new technologies (especially P2P technology) has pushed the ability of individual reproduction and dissemination to the extreme. Having broken the original balance of interests between copyright owners and new technology providers, the Supreme Court in the Grokster case realized that the mere application of material non-infringing uses would lead to adverse consequences for the right holder, Finally established the copyright inducement infringement rule. The third chapter analyzes the infringement cases of copyright inducement in the judicial practice of the United States. This paper tries to construct the system of inducement infringement rules. The constitutive elements of copyright inducement infringement rules include the direct infringement of the third party and the subjective intention of inducing others to carry out the infringement. Among them, the identification of inducement intention is the key to the identification of liability for seduction tort. Through the comprehensive analysis of all cases involving inducement infringement after the Grokster case, this paper classifies and sums up the factors of determining the intention of seduction. At the same time, the relationship between inducement infringement and aiding infringement is expounded. Chapter 4th, on the basis of the comprehensive analysis of American copyright inducement infringement system, returns to our copyright system and puts forward that the copyright inductive infringement rules have the applicable theoretical basis in our country. It also points out that the court in our country has already used the core thought theory of the inducement tort rule for reference in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;DD913

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸幸生;袁學(xué)術(shù);顧翔;;《南通家紡市場版權(quán)保護情況調(diào)研報告》內(nèi)容概要[J];中國版權(quán);2010年02期

2 肖虹;;南通經(jīng)驗 世界共享——南通家紡產(chǎn)業(yè)版權(quán)保護調(diào)研報告在京發(fā)布[J];中國版權(quán);2010年04期

3 鄒雅菁;;演出產(chǎn)業(yè)中的音樂版權(quán)保護[J];藝海;2011年06期

4 鄭曉紅;;楊紅櫻:我的版權(quán)誰做主?[J];中國版權(quán);2010年02期

5 李壽榮;李明山;;《大清著作權(quán)律》出臺的前前后后[J];中國版權(quán);2010年05期

6 沈麗紅;;學(xué)位論文的法律屬性及其利用[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年05期

7 姚頡靖;彭輝;;版權(quán)保護與軟件業(yè)盜版關(guān)系的實證研究——基于51個國家的數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2011年06期

8 言恭達;;關(guān)于版權(quán)保護當前的形勢和建議[J];中國版權(quán);2010年04期

9 彭翊;李方麗;;銀行版權(quán)質(zhì)押風(fēng)險控制探析[J];中國版權(quán);2010年04期

10 ;南通家紡城版權(quán)事務(wù)服務(wù)有限公司[J];中國版權(quán);2010年06期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 唐麗;;論科學(xué)作品的版權(quán)保護[A];2002年全國自然辯證法學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展年會論文集[C];2002年

2 田震;陳高興;李改肖;王斌;;中國數(shù)字海圖生產(chǎn)與版權(quán)保護[A];全國地圖學(xué)與GIS學(xué)術(shù)會議論文集[C];2004年

3 宋玉杰;劉瑞禎;譚鐵牛;;一種用于印刷品防偽的數(shù)字水印技術(shù)[A];中國圖象圖形學(xué)會第十屆全國圖像圖形學(xué)術(shù)會議（CIG’2001）和第一屆全國虛擬現(xiàn)實技術(shù)研討會（CVR’2001）論文集[C];2001年

4 方英;;科技期刊與版權(quán)保護[A];科技期刊編輯研究文集（第三集）[C];1994年

5 劉e，

本文編號：1507256