本文關(guān)鍵詞： 附隨義務(wù) 法定化 法律后果 歸責(zé)原則　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：合同附隨義務(wù)作為現(xiàn)代債之關(guān)系理論發(fā)展的顯著成果之一,對債法的功能以及民事責(zé)任體系的變遷產(chǎn)生了深遠的影響。2002年的德國債法改革實現(xiàn)了德國合同附隨義務(wù)的法定化,從而產(chǎn)生了廣泛的影響。 我國《合同法》中雖然規(guī)定了合同附隨義務(wù),但是并不完善。目前,在一些基本理論上尚未形成共識,司法實踐中對附隨義務(wù)的理解和適用也較為混亂,這些情況不但影響了法律適用的統(tǒng)一,也損害了法律的權(quán)威性。有鑒于此,研究德國的附隨義務(wù)理論對我國相關(guān)立法和司法實踐都具有重要的意義。 本文分六個部分進行論述: 引言部分闡明本文討論的問題,主要介紹本文的寫作背景和目的,包括本文的研究對象、研究方法以及在立法和司法實踐中的研究意義。 第一章為附隨義務(wù)的理論探源。該部分闡述了附隨義務(wù)與羅馬法中誠實信用原則的關(guān)系,將附隨義務(wù)與相關(guān)制度進行了比較,分析了附隨義務(wù)在德國法上的法定化過程。 第二章介紹了德國現(xiàn)行民法上的附隨義務(wù)。該部分主要分析《德國民法典》中關(guān)于附隨義務(wù)的相關(guān)規(guī)定,并對其進行了評析。 第三章闡述我國《合同法》中有關(guān)附隨義務(wù)的規(guī)定和相關(guān)司法實踐情況。該部分主要分析我國《合同法》中關(guān)于附隨義務(wù)的相關(guān)規(guī)定以及司法實踐中所遇到的問題,在此基礎(chǔ)上對我國法中關(guān)于附隨義務(wù)的規(guī)定進行了反思。 第四章論述德國法中有關(guān)附隨義務(wù)的規(guī)定對完善我國附隨義務(wù)的啟示。該部分主要從四個方面分析了德國法上的附隨義務(wù)對我國法的啟示,并提出了相關(guān)建議。 結(jié)論部分總結(jié)本文觀點,并對該制度進行展望。
[Abstract]:As one of the remarkable achievements in the development of modern debt relationship theory, contract collateral obligation has a profound influence on the function of debt law and the change of civil liability system. In 2002, the reform of German debt law realized the legalization of German contract collateral obligation. Thus has produced the widespread influence. Although the contract law of our country stipulates the collateral obligation of contract, it is not perfect. At present, there is no consensus on some basic theories, and the understanding and application of collateral obligation in judicial practice is also confused. These situations not only affect the unity of the application of the law, but also damage the authority of the law. In view of this, the study of the theory of collateral obligation in Germany is of great significance to the relevant legislation and judicial practice of our country. This paper is divided into six parts:. The introduction explains the problems discussed in this paper, mainly introduces the writing background and purpose of this paper, including the research object, research methods and research significance in legislative and judicial practice. The first chapter is the theoretical exploration of collateral obligation. This part expounds the relationship between collateral obligation and the principle of good faith in Roman law, compares the collateral obligation with relevant systems, and analyzes the legalization process of collateral obligation in German law. The second chapter introduces the collateral obligations in the current German civil law. This part mainly analyzes the relevant provisions of the German Civil Code on collateral obligations and makes an analysis of them. The third chapter elaborates the stipulation and the related judicial practice of the collateral obligation in the contract Law of our country. This part mainly analyzes the relevant provisions about the collateral obligation in the contract Law of our country and the problems encountered in the judicial practice. On the basis of this, we reflect on the stipulation of collateral obligation in Chinese law. Chapter 4th discusses the enlightenment of the stipulation of collateral obligation in German law on the perfection of China's collateral obligation. This part mainly analyzes the enlightenment of collateral obligation in German law to Chinese law from four aspects, and puts forward some relevant suggestions. The conclusion part summarizes the point of view of this article, and carries on the prospect to this system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D951.6;D923.6

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫峰;附隨義務(wù)研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1506009