本文關(guān)鍵詞： 美國(guó) 反傾銷 歸零計(jì)算法　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：歸零法是美國(guó)商務(wù)部運(yùn)用的一種計(jì)算方法,用來計(jì)算外國(guó)生產(chǎn)商向美國(guó)出口的產(chǎn)品的加權(quán)平均傾銷幅度。歸零方案的定義本質(zhì)是,在國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)的銷售價(jià)格等于或者高于正常價(jià)值即被視為傾銷幅度是零,而非負(fù)的傾銷幅度。因此,當(dāng)這些銷售與同一外國(guó)生產(chǎn)商所為的低于正常價(jià)值的銷售共同計(jì)算,從而求得平均數(shù)時(shí),整個(gè)傾銷幅度明顯更高而且通常會(huì)導(dǎo)致反傾銷稅的執(zhí)行。 本文將會(huì)從追溯國(guó)際和國(guó)內(nèi)的爭(zhēng)端解決領(lǐng)域的歸零爭(zhēng)論的歷史開始,并且重點(diǎn)討論美國(guó)法院和WTO以及NAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制對(duì)歸零法的區(qū)別對(duì)待。接著,筆者將會(huì)從兩方面來探討否定美國(guó)歸零法的不正當(dāng)性。一方面,總結(jié)國(guó)際組織對(duì)美國(guó)歸零法的態(tài)度;另一方面,將會(huì)考察歸零問題與美國(guó)的Chevron標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和Charming Betsy原則的聯(lián)系。最后,通過國(guó)際爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制對(duì)美國(guó)歸零法的分析,以及美國(guó)的國(guó)內(nèi)原則在國(guó)內(nèi)法律的合理應(yīng)用表明:為了使美國(guó)的貿(mào)易實(shí)踐與其在WTO《反傾銷協(xié)議》以及NAFTA中的義務(wù)相符,美國(guó)商務(wù)部應(yīng)該拋棄負(fù)的傾銷幅度的歸零實(shí)踐。然而,本文也指出,鑒于有利于歸零法持續(xù)應(yīng)用的政治主張以及那些譴責(zé)歸零法的國(guó)際機(jī)構(gòu)的內(nèi)在執(zhí)行力的缺乏,美國(guó)可能在未來會(huì)繼續(xù)在反傾銷過程中采取歸零計(jì)算法。最后,針對(duì)目前美國(guó)仍然堅(jiān)持使用歸零法的現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)中國(guó)在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中面臨該威脅該如何應(yīng)對(duì)提出建議。 第一部分簡(jiǎn)要介紹美國(guó)歸零計(jì)算法。首先界定了歸零計(jì)算法的概念和類型,并介紹歸零法的產(chǎn)生背景,反傾銷以及反傾銷措施的運(yùn)用,接著對(duì)美國(guó)廣泛使用歸零計(jì)算法的消極影響進(jìn)行了分析,這是為了方便從宏觀上認(rèn)識(shí)歸零計(jì)算法,有利于對(duì)歸零計(jì)算法進(jìn)行闡述和說明。最后對(duì)歸零法產(chǎn)生的爭(zhēng)端進(jìn)行了概述,并分析了不同的觀點(diǎn)及其依據(jù)。 第二部分是美國(guó)適用歸零計(jì)算法引起的爭(zhēng)端及其解決。主要包括兩大部分,一個(gè)是至今美國(guó)歸零計(jì)算法的運(yùn)用在實(shí)踐中引起的爭(zhēng)端。另一部分是,以上爭(zhēng)端的解決,在本部分,分別介紹了美國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易法院,NAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)和WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)歸零計(jì)算法的態(tài)度,并分析了它們的不同態(tài)度以及為什么會(huì)有這些差異存在。 第三部分針對(duì)美國(guó)歸零計(jì)算法展開理論分析,從第二部分歸零爭(zhēng)端解決的差異入手,分析美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法在解決歸零問題上與國(guó)內(nèi)原則和國(guó)際法存在的沖突,這是本文的重點(diǎn),筆者從美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法和國(guó)際法兩個(gè)層面展開分析,說明了歸零計(jì)算法的不正當(dāng)性,駁斥美國(guó)堅(jiān)持使用歸零計(jì)算法的狡辯。 第四部分分析美國(guó)在現(xiàn)實(shí)中仍然憑借其在經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域的強(qiáng)勢(shì)地位,在其歸零計(jì)算法多次被國(guó)際爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)否定的情況下,仍然不愿意從根本上放棄適用歸零計(jì)算法的現(xiàn)狀,并分析了美國(guó)歸零計(jì)算法的適用對(duì)中國(guó)的影響,對(duì)中國(guó)在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中面臨該威脅該如何應(yīng)對(duì)提出建議,以期減少因此而可能受到的損害。
[Abstract]:Zeroing is a U.S. Department of Commerce by the weighted calculation method used to calculate the foreign producers of products exported to the United States the average margin of dumping. Definition of the nature of zero solution is, in the domestic market sales price is equal to or higher than the normal value shall be regarded as the dumping margin is zero, rather than a negative dumping margin so when these sales with foreign producers is lower than the normal value of sales to calculate, so as to obtain the average number, the dumping margin significantly higher and usually results in the imposition of antidumping duties.
This paper will address dating from the international and domestic disputes in the field of zero in the history of the debate, and focuses on the United States Court and WTO NAFTA dispute settlement mechanism as well as discrimination zero method. Then, the author will from two aspects to explore the negation of zeroing is not when. On the one hand, the summary of international the attitude of the United States organization of zeroing; on the other hand, will examine zero problem with the American Chevron standard and Charming Betsy principle. Finally, solve the mechanism analysis of American zeroing through domestic and international disputes, the principle of American in the reasonable application of domestic law shows that in order to make the trade of the United States with the WTO< anti dumping agreement and NAFTA > obligation in the match, the U.S. Department of commerce should abandon the practice of zero negative dumping margin. However, this paper also pointed out that in favor of the continued use of zeroing The lack of internal politics and those who condemned the execution of zeroing international institutions force, the United States may in the future will continue to adopt anti-dumping zeroing process. Finally, according to the current situation of the United States still insist on the use of zeroing, the China facing the threat of the suggestions on how to deal with it in international trade.
The first part is a brief introduction of the zeroing. First defines the concept and types of zeroing, and introduces the background of zeroing, the use of anti dumping and anti-dumping measures, then widely used zeroing on the negative impact of the analysis, it is easy to realize zero calculation from the macroscopic view, is conducive to the zero calculation method are elaborated. Finally the zeroing disputes are summarized and analyzed, and according to different views.
The second part is the application of zeroing dispute and its solution. Mainly includes two parts, one is the use of American zeroing caused in the practice of the dispute. The second part is to solve the above issues, in this part, introduced the United States Court of international trade, the NAFTA dispute settlement mechanism the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and the attitude of the zeroing, and analyzes their different attitudes and why these differences exist.
The third part of the United States zeroing on theoretical analysis, starting from the differences between the second part zero dispute settlement of conflicts, the domestic law of the United States in solving problems with the principle of zero domestic and international law, which is the focus of this paper, the author starts from the two aspects of domestic law and international law analysis. That is not the legitimacy of zeroing, refuted the United States insist on the use of zeroing sophistry.
The fourth part is the analysis of the United States in reality still by virtue of its strong position in the economic field, the zeroing mechanism has been solved the case of negative international disputes, still not willing to give up the current application of zeroing fundamentally, and analyzed the influence for American zeroing of Chinese. On the face of the threat Chinese suggestions on how to deal with it in international trade, in order to reduce the potential damage.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D971.2;DD912.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸蓉;何祖普;;對(duì)NAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)權(quán)限缺失的思考[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2007年04期

2 吳偉;;試析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年01期

3 張章盛;;論“歸零法”在國(guó)際貿(mào)易法中法律地位的歷史演變[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

4 謝妍;;美國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易法院對(duì)反傾銷案件的司法審查[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年17期

5 劉勇;;論反傾銷調(diào)查程序中的“歸零法”[J];法治研究;2008年10期

6 鄧德雄;比較應(yīng)公平——?dú)W共體反傾銷“零”做法及引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)議[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2001年05期

7 張輝;;NAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的內(nèi)容和特點(diǎn)[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

8 朱廣東;;反傾銷歸零屢禁不止的原因及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2010年07期

9 呂曉杰;;美國(guó)的Charming Besty原則與WTO協(xié)定的內(nèi)國(guó)效力[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

10 孫雯;;司法與仲裁的融合——NAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的特點(diǎn)[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳曦;論反傾銷中的“歸零計(jì)算法”[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

2 張譯丹;從WTO反傾銷歸零爭(zhēng)議看美國(guó)法律解釋原則之沖突[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1492115