本文關(guān)鍵詞： 博弈邏輯 法院調(diào)解制度 納什均衡 決策集 決策 蜈蚣博弈　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：博弈邏輯作為一門新興學(xué)科，被廣泛應(yīng)用到經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、社會學(xué)等學(xué)科領(lǐng)域。對博弈邏輯本身的研究也存在動態(tài)博弈邏輯和靜態(tài)博弈邏輯等多種方法。法院調(diào)解制度在我國具體國情下應(yīng)運(yùn)而生，是具有中國特色社會主義法律體系中的重要一環(huán)，但是在調(diào)解制度的具體執(zhí)行過程中也存在一些問題，如調(diào)解和審判未完全分離，查清案件事實(shí)工作的忽視，這些情況直接導(dǎo)致了調(diào)解結(jié)案后的執(zhí)行難，從而又進(jìn)入判決程序的情況，沒有達(dá)到法院調(diào)解制度創(chuàng)立的初衷。 本文主要運(yùn)用博弈邏輯的方法，分析在法院調(diào)解制度中當(dāng)事人的思維過程，決策過程，從動態(tài)、靜態(tài)兩個過程與調(diào)解制度中宏觀決策過程，微觀個案分析過程為兩條主線對法院調(diào)解制度從開始到調(diào)解結(jié)案，當(dāng)事人的博弈思維進(jìn)行分析。梳理整合出法院調(diào)解制度的整個博弈邏輯規(guī)律，并從博弈邏輯的視角提出如何完善我國法院調(diào)解制度，更好的實(shí)現(xiàn)調(diào)解制度的創(chuàng)立初衷。 文章共分為四個部分：第一部分是介紹博弈論和博弈邏輯的研究進(jìn)程，，博弈邏輯的研究方法等內(nèi)容。目的是對博弈邏輯做一個宏觀性的闡述，對博弈邏輯作出初步分類，以達(dá)到為第三部分剖析整個法院調(diào)解制度中博弈邏輯過程進(jìn)行初步的鋪墊；第二部分從法理學(xué)與法的社會學(xué)角度闡述當(dāng)前我國法院調(diào)解制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值，并對國外類似的制度（法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度等）作出比較研究，通過這兩方面分析說明我國法院調(diào)解制度現(xiàn)實(shí)效果與創(chuàng)設(shè)時所預(yù)期的社會實(shí)效差距和原因；第三部分從宏觀和圍觀兩個層面對法院調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行博弈邏輯分析，論證整個調(diào)解制度中當(dāng)事人的思維過程，決策的出發(fā)點(diǎn)與當(dāng)事人之間共同取得最優(yōu)決策集的博弈邏輯規(guī)律。用博弈邏輯這一全新的視角來研究法院調(diào)解制度的整個靜態(tài)和動態(tài)博弈邏輯規(guī)律；最后一部分通過前文的研究，創(chuàng)造性的架構(gòu)法院調(diào)解制度中當(dāng)事人思維規(guī)律的博弈邏輯模型（我將其命名為納什均衡點(diǎn)環(huán)繞理論），通過這一模型更直觀的說明整個法院調(diào)解過程中影響當(dāng)事人決策思維的不同原因，并得出如何對我國當(dāng)前法院調(diào)解制度的“博弈邏輯”方法完善。
[Abstract]:As a new discipline, game logic is widely used in economics. There are many methods in the study of game logic, such as dynamic game logic and static game logic. The court mediation system emerges as the times require under the specific conditions of our country. It is an important link in the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, but there are some problems in the concrete implementation of the mediation system, such as the incomplete separation of mediation and trial, and the neglect of finding out the facts of the case. These circumstances directly lead to the difficulty of execution after the settlement of mediation, and thus to the situation of judgment procedure, which does not meet the original intention of the establishment of court mediation system. This paper mainly uses the method of game logic to analyze the thinking process and decision-making process of the parties in the court mediation system, from the dynamic and static two processes and the macro-decision-making process in the mediation system. The microcosmic case analysis process consists of two main lines: from the beginning to the end of mediation, the game thinking of the parties is analyzed, and the whole game logic law of the court mediation system is sorted out. From the perspective of game logic, the author puts forward how to perfect the court mediation system and realize the original intention of the mediation system. The article is divided into four parts: the first part is to introduce the game theory and game logic research process, game logic research methods and so on. To make a preliminary classification of game logic, in order to achieve the third part of the analysis of the whole court mediation system in the process of game logic preliminary foreshadowing; The second part expounds the realistic value of the court mediation system in our country from the angle of sociology of jurisprudence and law, and makes a comparative study on the similar systems abroad (the court-attached mediation system, etc.). Through the analysis of these two aspects, this paper explains the gap and reasons of the actual effect of the court mediation system in our country and the social actual effect expected when it was created. The third part analyzes the game logic of the court mediation system from the macro level and the onlookers level, and demonstrates the thinking process of the parties in the whole mediation system. The starting point of the decision and the game logic law of the optimal decision set are obtained between the parties. The whole static and dynamic game logic law of the court mediation system is studied with the game logic. The last part through the previous study, the creative structure of the court mediation system in the party thinking rules of the game logic model (I will call it Nash equilibrium point surround theory). Through this model, we can more intuitively explain the different reasons that affect the decision-making thinking of the parties in the whole court mediation process, and find out how to perfect the "game logic" method of the current court mediation system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2;D90-051

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁平;陳奎;;論法院調(diào)解價(jià)值的剛性特質(zhì)與司法實(shí)踐的柔性歸位[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2010年01期

2 張峰;博弈邏輯述評[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 薛江武;完善我國法院調(diào)解制度的再思考[J];法律適用;2000年05期

4 楊霞娟;;淺議我國法院調(diào)解制度的完善[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

5 李曉棠;;法院調(diào)解制度的價(jià)值與完善[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2008年06期

6 李瑛;對訴訟調(diào)解價(jià)值的評價(jià)[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2002年05期

7 李韌之;;類型學(xué)及其理論框架下的語言比較[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 劉新紅;;論我國法院調(diào)解制度存續(xù)的合理性[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2007年11期

9 張峰;;博弈邏輯的發(fā)展軌跡探析[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;2008年01期

10 頂柱;;試論我國民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的不足及其完善[J];前沿;2006年09期

本文編號：1458465