本文關(guān)鍵詞：中美立體商標比較研究　出處：《華中科技大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 立體商標 商業(yè)外觀 權(quán)利競合 權(quán)利沖突 顯著性 非功能性

【摘要】：我國在2001年新商標法中正式將“三維標志”列入了商標法保護的客體范圍。自此正式確立了立體商標在商標法上的立法保護地位,而由此引發(fā)的立體商標的內(nèi)涵界定問題,立體商標與其他知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的關(guān)系問題,立體商標的權(quán)利成立要件的確定問題不斷出現(xiàn),可以說不論是在理論研究上,還是在實務(wù)上,在我國還屬新興的商標類型的立體商標都面臨著很大的考驗。 在美國,《蘭哈姆法》通過對商業(yè)外觀的保護實現(xiàn)對立體商標的保護。同時美國是保護商業(yè)外觀相對較早的國家,有較為成熟的立法和豐富的判例為保護立體商標提供法律保障以及美國學者對立體商標的深入研究,都對完善我國立體商標的保護具有很強的借鑒意義。 本文系統(tǒng)的論述中美兩國的立體商標制度,并在比較的基礎(chǔ)上對我國如何完善立體商標的法律構(gòu)建和厘清理論爭議提出建議和思考。首先本文從立體商標的內(nèi)涵入手,對立體商標和商業(yè)外觀這兩個概念進行了分析。分析商業(yè)外觀與立體商標概念的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別,提煉了立體商標的法律特征,并闡述了對其保護的理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實意義。接著,采用理論分析和案例研究相結(jié)合的方式從我國立體商標的立法的現(xiàn)狀,以及我國立體商標的權(quán)利成立要件(主要是顯著性和非功能性),立體商標與其他知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的關(guān)系,三個方面介紹分析了我國了立體商標法律制度現(xiàn)狀。然后,亦圍繞這三個方面介紹了美國立體商標在此問題上的的現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展狀況。最后,在總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上比較性的分析了中美立體商標在這三個方面的差距和差異,圍繞上述問題,充分借鑒了美國對商業(yè)外觀保護的經(jīng)驗,提出了筆者自己的理論觀點及立法建議。
[Abstract]:In 2001, in the new trademark law of our country, the "three-dimensional mark" was formally included in the object scope of trademark law protection. Since then, it has formally established the legislative protection status of three-dimensional trademark in trademark law. Therefore, the connotation of the three-dimensional trademark, the relationship between the three-dimensional trademark and other intellectual property rights, the establishment of the rights of the three-dimensional trademark issues continue to appear, can be said to be in the theoretical research. In practice, the three-dimensional trademark, which is also a new type of trademark in China, is facing a great test. In the United States, the "Lanham Act" through the protection of the commercial appearance to achieve the protection of three-dimensional trademarks, and the United States is a relatively early protection of the commercial appearance of the country. There are more mature legislation and rich jurisprudence to provide legal protection for the protection of stereoscopic trademarks, as well as the in-depth study of stereoscopic trademarks by American scholars, all of which have a strong reference significance for perfecting the protection of stereoscopic trademarks in China. This paper systematically discusses the three-dimensional trademark system between China and the United States. And on the basis of comparison on how to improve the legal construction of three-dimensional trademark and clarify the theoretical disputes put forward suggestions and thinking. First, this paper starts with the connotation of three-dimensional trademark. This paper analyzes the two concepts of stereoscopic trademark and commercial appearance, analyzes the relationship and difference between the concept of three-dimensional trademark and commercial appearance, and abstracts the legal characteristics of stereoscopic trademark. And elaborated on its protection of the theoretical basis and practical significance. Then, the use of theoretical analysis and case studies combined with the way from the status quo of the legislation of three-dimensional trademark in China. And the establishment of the rights of three-dimensional trademarks in China (mainly significant and non-functional, the relationship between three-dimensional trademarks and other intellectual property rights, three aspects of the introduction and analysis of the legal system of three-dimensional trademark status. Then. It also introduces the current situation and development of the American stereo trademark on this issue around these three aspects. Finally, on the basis of the summary, the author analyzes the gap and difference between the three aspects of the three-dimensional trademark in China and the United States. Based on the above problems, the author draws lessons from the experience of the United States in the protection of commercial appearance, and puts forward his own theoretical views and legislative suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;DD913

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 青木博通;日本的立體商標與外觀設(shè)計[J];中華商標;2003年11期

2 劉紅;基于衡平理念探析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突[J];中華商標;2004年07期

3 魏衍亮;用商標法保護商業(yè)外觀[J];中華商標;2005年03期

4 林曦;商業(yè)外觀的法律保護初探[J];當代法學;2004年06期

5 孔祥俊;;論商業(yè)外觀的法律保護[J];人民司法;2005年04期

6 劉光華;荊媛媛;;論商業(yè)外觀的《反不正當競爭法》調(diào)整[J];蘭州商學院學報;2007年02期

7 呂強;;我國商業(yè)外觀的特征及法律保護[J];山西省政法管理干部學院學報;2007年03期

8 林曉云;美國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律關(guān)于工業(yè)品外觀設(shè)計保護范圍的規(guī)定(下)[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年06期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 葉若思;商業(yè)外觀權(quán)研究[D];吉林大學;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 陸川;商業(yè)外觀的法律保護[D];華東政法學院;2006年

2 章怡;商業(yè)外觀的法律保護和立法模式選擇[D];華東政法學院;2006年

3 李建萍;商業(yè)外觀法律制度研究[D];湖南師范大學;2007年

4 李騰;論立體商標的法律保護[D];暨南大學;2008年

5 李琦;我國立體商標的注冊與保護研究[D];中國政法大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1437138