【摘要】：目的觀察中醫(yī)臨床路徑治療急性上呼吸道感染的臨床療效。方法按中醫(yī)外感發(fā)熱的辨證標(biāo)準(zhǔn)將該病分為風(fēng)寒束表證、風(fēng)熱犯表證、暑濕襲表證、衛(wèi)氣同病證、熱毒襲肺證5個(gè)證型,予中醫(yī)臨床路徑協(xié)定方治療,觀察患者治療4 h、24 h、72 h時(shí)發(fā)熱、頭痛、咽痛、全身酸痛、咳嗽改善情況。結(jié)果完成觀察628例,其中風(fēng)寒束表證102例、風(fēng)熱犯表證208例、衛(wèi)氣同病證217例、暑濕襲表證78例、熱毒襲肺證23例。72 h痊愈485例,5例惡化轉(zhuǎn)為肺炎。4 h、24 h、72 h退熱有效率分別為46.66%、54.45%、93.47%。衛(wèi)氣同病證24 h退熱有效率高于4 h(P0.05),其他證型72 h退熱有效率高于24 h(P0.05)。衛(wèi)氣同病證4 h、24 h退熱有效率優(yōu)于風(fēng)寒束表證、風(fēng)熱犯表證(P0.01),前者24 h退熱有效率亦高于暑濕襲表證(P0.05)。4 h、24 h、72 h頭痛、咽痛、全身酸痛治療有效率分別為37.90%、66.08%、82.32%。風(fēng)寒束表證、風(fēng)熱犯表證、暑濕襲表證及衛(wèi)氣同病證各癥狀24 h治療有效率優(yōu)于4 h(P0.05),風(fēng)寒束表證、風(fēng)熱犯表證、衛(wèi)氣同病證及熱毒襲肺證各癥狀72 h治療有效率優(yōu)于24 h(P0.05)。衛(wèi)氣同病證各癥狀4 h有效率44.24%高于風(fēng)熱犯表證33.65%(P0.05)。4 h、24 h、72 h咳嗽治療有效率分別為34.55%、59.71%、73.73%。風(fēng)寒束表證、風(fēng)熱犯表證、暑濕襲表證及衛(wèi)氣同病證咳嗽24 h治療有效率高于4 h(P0.05)。風(fēng)寒束表證、風(fēng)熱犯表證及衛(wèi)氣同病證咳嗽72 h治療有效率高于24 h(P0.05)。結(jié)論中醫(yī)臨床路徑治療急性上呼吸道感染療效確切。
[Abstract]:Objective to observe the clinical effect of TCM clinical pathway in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infection. Methods according to the syndrome differentiation standard of external fever in TCM, the disease was divided into five syndromes: wind-cold bundle syndrome, wind-heat invasion syndrome, summer-dampness syndrome, Wei Qi syndromes, heat toxin attack on lung syndrome, and was treated with traditional Chinese medicine clinical path agreement formula for 4 hours. Fever, headache, sore throat, sore whole body and cough improved at 24 h or 72 h. Results 628 cases were observed, including 102 cases of wind-cold bundle syndrome, 208 cases of wind and heat violation syndrome, 217 cases of Wei Qi syndromes syndrome, 78 cases of heat and dampness attack syndrome, 23 cases of heat poison attack on lung syndrome. 485 cases were cured in 72 h, 5 cases turned to pneumonia for 24 h. The effective rate of antifebrile in 72 hours was 46.66 and 54.45 and 93.47, respectively. The effective rate of antipyretic in 24 h was higher than 4 h (P0.05), and the effective rate of 72 h in other syndromes was higher than 24 h (P0.05). The effective rate of antipyretic for 4 h and 24 h in the same disease syndrome of Wei Qi was better than that of the syndrome of wind-cold bundle and wind heat violation (P0.01). The effective rate of antipyretic in the former 24 hours was also higher than that in the syndrome of dampness attack in summer heat (P0.05). The headache and pharynx were found in 24 hours after 24 hours of heat attack (P0.05). The effective rates of systemic pain treatment were 37.90% and 66.08%, 82.32%, respectively. The effective rate of 24 h treatment for symptoms of wind-cold bundle syndrome, wind-heat violation syndrome, summer-dampness attack syndrome and Wei Qi syndromes syndrome was better than 4 hours (P0.05). The effective rate was better than 24 hours (P0.05). The effective rate of 4 h symptoms of Wei Qi syndromes was 44.24% higher than that of wind heat syndrome 33.65% (P0.05). The effective rate of cough treatment for 24 h or 72 h was 34.55% and 59.71% respectively. The effective rate of cough in 24 hours was higher than that in 4 hours (P0.05). The effective rate of cough for 72 hours was higher than that in 24 hours (P0.05). Conclusion TCM clinical pathway is effective in treating acute upper respiratory tract infection.
【作者單位】： 南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院;
【基金】：基金項(xiàng)目:江蘇高校優(yōu)勢學(xué)科建設(shè)工程(95)
【分類號(hào)】：R259

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張葆青;刁娟娟;周朋;李燕寧;賈廣媛;;小兒急性上呼吸道感染風(fēng)寒束表證的臨床研究[J];遼寧中醫(yī)雜志;2011年12期

2 錢振福;;驅(qū)風(fēng)抗感顆粒治療急性上呼吸道感染風(fēng)寒束表證300例臨床觀察[J];中國中醫(yī)基礎(chǔ)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年08期

3 袁斌;孫軼秋;韓新民;張永春;袁雪晶;趙長江;孔飛;;銀花清暑合劑治療小兒夏季感冒暑濕襲表證臨床觀察[J];遼寧中醫(yī)雜志;2009年08期

4 李燕寧;勞慧敏;;兒童急性上呼吸道感染不同病原體感染與中醫(yī)證型的相關(guān)性[J];中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合兒科學(xué);2009年02期

5 梁偉波;張穎;韓凡;張曉春;覃小蘭;;中藥熏洗發(fā)汗法治療風(fēng)寒束表證外感發(fā)熱204例[J];上海中醫(yī)藥雜志;2011年04期

6 關(guān)麗娜;麥建玲;張曉春;楊春敏;陳莉;袁惠儀;夏燕萍;聶雪花;;中藥熏洗發(fā)汗法治療外感發(fā)熱風(fēng)寒束表證的護(hù)理[J];中國中醫(yī)急癥;2012年01期

7 朱春冬;季紅燕;王勝;董良英;;荊羌柴石湯治療感冒衛(wèi)氣同病證臨床研究[J];中醫(yī)藥臨床雜志;2011年11期

8 鄭宏鼎;吳景花;;風(fēng)寒束表證頸椎綜合征行桂枝加葛根湯配合頸椎整脊治療的療效分析[J];中醫(yī)臨床研究;2014年19期

9 張永春;銀花清暑合劑治療小兒外感發(fā)熱暑濕襲表證70例[J];河北中醫(yī);2004年05期

10 楊志宏;;羌桂香仙湯熏洗發(fā)汗治療風(fēng)寒束表證外感發(fā)熱204例臨床觀察[J];實(shí)用中醫(yī)內(nèi)科雜志;2013年11期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 梁偉波;覃小蘭;;中藥熏洗發(fā)汗法治療風(fēng)寒束表證外感發(fā)熱204例[A];2012中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)急救醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè)委員會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

2 奚小土;羅翌;嚴(yán)夏;李際強(qiáng);梅廣源;;柴莪退熱栓治療急性病毒性上呼吸道感染的臨床研究[A];2004年全國危重病急救醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2004年

3 羅翌;奚小土;周紅;劉濤;唐雪春;鄧秋迎;;柴莪退熱栓治療急性病毒性上呼吸道感染的臨床研究[A];2005年全國危重病急救醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議學(xué)術(shù)論文集[C];2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王肅杰;麻黃多皮飲加減治療蕁麻疹（風(fēng)寒束表證）的臨床療效觀察[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2013年

2 勞慧敏;兒童急性上呼吸道感染病原學(xué)檢測與中醫(yī)證候相關(guān)性研究[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2007年

3 襲雷鳴;兒童急性上呼吸道感染病原學(xué)檢測與中醫(yī)辨證分型相關(guān)性研究[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2006年

4 董玉崗;小兒急性上呼吸道感染的中醫(yī)證候要素研究[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2333187