胃食管反流病中醫(yī)證型分布規(guī)律及食管測壓參數(shù)的相關性研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-25 17:18
【摘要】：目的:探討胃食管反流病(GERD)中醫(yī)證型分布規(guī)律及其影響因素,并基于高分辨率食管測壓技術(HRM)研究各證型及其動力參數(shù)的相關性。方法:根據(jù)GERD西醫(yī)診斷標準,納入GERD患者114例,采集納入患者信息,包括性別、年齡、身高、體重、幽門螺桿菌(HP)感染情況,并由副主任及以上職稱醫(yī)師根據(jù)中醫(yī)診斷標準進行辨證分型,共分為寒熱錯雜證、肝胃郁熱證、肝胃不和證、痰濕內(nèi)阻證、中虛氣逆證5組,并行高分辨率食管測壓,記錄食管上括約肌(UES)、食管下括約肌(LES)、食管體部的相關動力參數(shù),分析不同中醫(yī)證型及其動力參數(shù)的相關性。結果:1.中醫(yī)證型分布規(guī)律及影響因素114例GERD患者中寒熱錯雜證組39例(占34.2%),肝胃郁熱證組27例(占23.7%),肝胃不和證組21例(占18.4%),痰濕內(nèi)阻證組16例(占14.0%),中虛氣逆證組11例(占9.6%),證型分布與西醫(yī)分型構成無統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。年齡方面,肝胃不和證組及肝胃郁熱證組男性發(fā)病率高于女性,其余三型男性低于女性,各組間無統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。中虛氣逆證平均發(fā)病年齡(60.45±9.99)歲明顯高于其余四型(P0.05),各組年齡段分布存在差異(P0.05)。各組在體重指數(shù)、HP感染率均無統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。2.食管動力參數(shù)研究(1)UES動力參數(shù):在UES靜息壓方面,痰濕內(nèi)阻證組要低于肝胃郁熱證組及中虛氣逆證組(P0.05);各組間在UES長度、UES殘余壓方面無統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。(2)LES動力參數(shù):在LES靜息壓方面,中虛氣逆證組、寒熱錯雜證組明顯低于其他3組,且與肝胃郁熱證組及痰濕內(nèi)阻證組有統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05);各組間在LES長度、4s綜合松弛壓、LES低壓占比方面均無統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。(3)食管體部動力參數(shù):在遠端收縮積分(DCI)方面,肝胃郁熱證組高于中虛氣逆證組及寒熱錯雜證組(P0.05)。在蠕動中斷方面,中虛氣逆證組高于寒熱錯雜證組(P0.05)。在收縮前沿速度(CFV)、遠端潛伏期(DL)方面均無統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。(4)無效收縮:在收縮力度方面,痰濕內(nèi)阻證組高于其他四組(P0.05)。在無效收縮占比方面,痰濕內(nèi)阻證組低于其他四組(P0.05)。(5)在濕咽成功率方面,痰濕內(nèi)阻證組高于寒熱錯雜證組、肝胃不和證組及肝胃郁熱證組(P0.05),同時,中虛氣逆證組低于寒熱錯雜證組、肝胃郁熱證組及痰濕內(nèi)阻證組(P0.05)。結論:GERD中醫(yī)證型中以寒熱錯雜證最為常見,其次依次為肝胃郁熱證、肝胃不和證、痰濕內(nèi)阻證、中虛氣逆證。GERD患者不同證型與年齡、UES靜息壓、LES靜息壓、DCI、無效收縮占比、食管收縮力度、濕咽成功率有一定相關性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the distribution of TCM syndromes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its influencing factors, and to study the correlation between these syndromes and their dynamic parameters based on high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). Methods: according to the diagnostic criteria of western medicine for GERD, 114 patients with GERD were included in the study. The information including sex, age, height, weight, Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection was collected. According to the diagnostic criteria of TCM, the doctors with deputy director and above were divided into five groups: cold and heat disorder syndrome, liver and stomach stagnation syndrome, liver and stomach disharmony syndrome, phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome, middle deficiency qi inverse syndrome, and high resolution esophageal manometry. The dynamic parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES),) lower esophageal sphincter (LES),) esophagus were recorded and the correlation of different TCM syndromes and their dynamic parameters were analyzed. The result is 1: 1. The distribution pattern of TCM syndromes and its influencing factors were 39 cases (34.2%) in the cold and heat disorder syndrome group, 27 cases (23.7%) in the liver and stomach stagnation syndrome group, 21 cases (18.4%) in the liver and stomach disharmony syndrome group, 16 cases (14.0%) in the phlegm dampness and internal obstruction syndrome group, and 11 cases in the middle deficiency and qi inverse syndrome group. There was no statistical difference between the distribution of syndromes and the composition of western medicine typing (P0.05). In terms of age, the incidence of liver and stomach disharmony syndrome and stagnation of heat of liver and stomach in male group was higher than that in female group, and the other three types of males were lower than female. There was no statistical difference among the three groups (P0.05). The average age of onset of the syndrome was (60.45 鹵9.99) years old, which was significantly higher than that of the other four types (P0.05), and the age distribution of each group was different (P0.05). There was no significant difference in body mass index (BMI) and HP infection rate among the groups (P0.05). Study on esophageal dynamic parameters (1) UES dynamic parameters: in UES resting pressure, The phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group was lower than the liver and stomach stagnation heat syndrome group and the middle deficiency qi inverse syndrome group (P0.05); there was no significant difference in UES length and UES residual pressure between the groups (P0.05). (2) LES dynamic parameters: in LES resting pressure group, middle deficiency Qi inverse syndrome group, The cold and heat disorder syndrome group was significantly lower than the other three groups, There was no significant difference in LES length, 4 s comprehensive relaxation pressure and LES hypobaric ratio between the groups (P0.05). (3), and in the distal contraction integral (DCI), there was no significant difference between the three groups (P0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of LES, the comprehensive relaxation pressure of 4 s, and the ratio of low pressure to low pressure of LES (P0.05). (3). The liver and stomach stagnation syndrome group was higher than the middle deficiency qi inverse syndrome group and the cold heat disorder syndrome group (P0.05). In the peristaltic interruption, the deficiency of qi in the syndrome group was higher than that in the cold and heat disorder syndrome group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the (DL) of the distal latency of (CFV), (P0.05). (4). In the contractile intensity, the phlegm dampness resistance syndrome group was higher than the other four groups (P0.05). In the ratio of invalid contraction, phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group was lower than other four groups (P0.05). (5) in wet pharynx success rate, phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group was higher than cold and heat disorder syndrome group, liver and stomach disharmony syndrome group and liver stomach stagnation heat syndrome group (P0.05), at the same time, The central deficiency of qi inverses syndrome group was lower than that of cold and heat disorder syndrome group, liver and stomach stagnation syndrome group and phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group (P0.05). Conclusion: the most common syndromes of GERD are cold and heat disorder, followed by liver and stomach stagnation, disharmony of liver and stomach, internal obstruction of phlegm and dampness, and inverses of middle deficiency and qi. Different types and ages of GERD patients, UES resting pressure, LES resting pressure, and invalid contraction of DCI, are the most common syndrome types. Esophageal contraction intensity, wet pharynx success rate has certain correlation.
【學位授予單位】：山東中醫(yī)藥大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：R259
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the distribution of TCM syndromes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its influencing factors, and to study the correlation between these syndromes and their dynamic parameters based on high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). Methods: according to the diagnostic criteria of western medicine for GERD, 114 patients with GERD were included in the study. The information including sex, age, height, weight, Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection was collected. According to the diagnostic criteria of TCM, the doctors with deputy director and above were divided into five groups: cold and heat disorder syndrome, liver and stomach stagnation syndrome, liver and stomach disharmony syndrome, phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome, middle deficiency qi inverse syndrome, and high resolution esophageal manometry. The dynamic parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES),) lower esophageal sphincter (LES),) esophagus were recorded and the correlation of different TCM syndromes and their dynamic parameters were analyzed. The result is 1: 1. The distribution pattern of TCM syndromes and its influencing factors were 39 cases (34.2%) in the cold and heat disorder syndrome group, 27 cases (23.7%) in the liver and stomach stagnation syndrome group, 21 cases (18.4%) in the liver and stomach disharmony syndrome group, 16 cases (14.0%) in the phlegm dampness and internal obstruction syndrome group, and 11 cases in the middle deficiency and qi inverse syndrome group. There was no statistical difference between the distribution of syndromes and the composition of western medicine typing (P0.05). In terms of age, the incidence of liver and stomach disharmony syndrome and stagnation of heat of liver and stomach in male group was higher than that in female group, and the other three types of males were lower than female. There was no statistical difference among the three groups (P0.05). The average age of onset of the syndrome was (60.45 鹵9.99) years old, which was significantly higher than that of the other four types (P0.05), and the age distribution of each group was different (P0.05). There was no significant difference in body mass index (BMI) and HP infection rate among the groups (P0.05). Study on esophageal dynamic parameters (1) UES dynamic parameters: in UES resting pressure, The phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group was lower than the liver and stomach stagnation heat syndrome group and the middle deficiency qi inverse syndrome group (P0.05); there was no significant difference in UES length and UES residual pressure between the groups (P0.05). (2) LES dynamic parameters: in LES resting pressure group, middle deficiency Qi inverse syndrome group, The cold and heat disorder syndrome group was significantly lower than the other three groups, There was no significant difference in LES length, 4 s comprehensive relaxation pressure and LES hypobaric ratio between the groups (P0.05). (3), and in the distal contraction integral (DCI), there was no significant difference between the three groups (P0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of LES, the comprehensive relaxation pressure of 4 s, and the ratio of low pressure to low pressure of LES (P0.05). (3). The liver and stomach stagnation syndrome group was higher than the middle deficiency qi inverse syndrome group and the cold heat disorder syndrome group (P0.05). In the peristaltic interruption, the deficiency of qi in the syndrome group was higher than that in the cold and heat disorder syndrome group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the (DL) of the distal latency of (CFV), (P0.05). (4). In the contractile intensity, the phlegm dampness resistance syndrome group was higher than the other four groups (P0.05). In the ratio of invalid contraction, phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group was lower than other four groups (P0.05). (5) in wet pharynx success rate, phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group was higher than cold and heat disorder syndrome group, liver and stomach disharmony syndrome group and liver stomach stagnation heat syndrome group (P0.05), at the same time, The central deficiency of qi inverses syndrome group was lower than that of cold and heat disorder syndrome group, liver and stomach stagnation syndrome group and phlegm dampness internal obstruction syndrome group (P0.05). Conclusion: the most common syndromes of GERD are cold and heat disorder, followed by liver and stomach stagnation, disharmony of liver and stomach, internal obstruction of phlegm and dampness, and inverses of middle deficiency and qi. Different types and ages of GERD patients, UES resting pressure, LES resting pressure, and invalid contraction of DCI, are the most common syndrome types. Esophageal contraction intensity, wet pharynx success rate has certain correlation.
【學位授予單位】：山東中醫(yī)藥大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：R259
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 蓋學明;遲莉麗;;胃食管反流病中醫(yī)辨治思路與方法[J];現(xiàn)代中醫(yī)藥;2016年01期
2 郭震浪;蘇振寧;王正飛;羅曉牧;;半夏瀉心湯加減治療反流性食管炎療效的Meta分析[J];中國實驗方劑學雜志;2015年24期
3 趙東梅;趙艷紅;張濤;;反流性食管炎PPARγ,HIF-1α表達意義及半夏厚樸湯干預研究[J];中國中西醫(yī)結合消化雜志;2015年11期
4 陳莉麗;卜平;;不同證型胃食管反流患者腦腸肽特點[J];世界華人消化雜志;2015年31期
5 顧韻;錢煒;;咽異感癥的高分辨率食管測壓特點分析[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2015年17期
6 袁媛;肖茹萍;陳陽;卜平;;胃食管反流病與精神心理、自主神經(jīng)功能關系的研究進展[J];世界華人消化雜志;2015年08期
7 王紅梅;張立平;陳麗如;劉晶;;基于胃食管反流病的胃腸動力與脾虛實質(zhì)探究[J];中國中西醫(yī)結合消化雜志;2015年03期
8 陶琳;沈晨;趙魯卿;李哲;張聲生;;胃食管反流病中醫(yī)證候與食管測壓關系研究[J];中華中醫(yī)藥雜志;2015年03期
9 陳軍;楊發(fā)周;魯磊;;中西醫(yī)結合配合針灸治療反流性食管炎的療效觀察[J];湖北中醫(yī)雜志;2014年11期
10 陳e，
本文編號：2294305
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/zhongyixuelunwen/2294305.html
最近更新
教材專著
