【摘要】：如何理解哲學?對這一問題往往存在不同理解。王路教授對拙作的異議,也涉及理解上的差異。就王路教授所質疑的智慧而言,作為哲學范疇的智慧不同于知識的基本點,就在于以跨越界限的方式去理解這一世界。智慧不僅僅限于"是什么"或邏輯、語義層面真的追求,而是同時以善和美為關切的對象,對真善美的這種關切包含著價值內(nèi)涵。就形而上學而言,王路教授強調(diào)形而上學研究"是"本身,但以"是"表述形而上學的問題,容易將哲學層面對形而上學問題的討論引向語言和邏輯的視域。除了將形而上學的對象主要限于"是"本身之外,王路教授還一再將其與"先驗性"聯(lián)系起來,然而,哲學作為把握世界的理論形態(tài),很難僅僅囿于先驗之域。哲學在形式的層面涉及概念分析。分析哲學雖有見于概念分析的意義,但每每由強調(diào)概念的邏輯分析而將概念的這種運作本身作為哲學的主要乃至全部工作,與之相應,如何達到真實的世界并賦予概念分析以智慧的內(nèi)涵,往往處于其視野之外。
[Abstract]:How to understand philosophy? There is often a different understanding of the problem. Professor Wang Lu's objection to his poor work also involves differences in understanding. As far as the wisdom questioned by Professor Wang Lu is concerned, the wisdom as a philosophical category is different from the basic point of knowledge, which lies in understanding the world in a way that transcends the boundary. Wisdom is not limited to "what" or logic, the semantic level of true pursuit, but at the same time to good and beauty as the object of concern, this concern for truth, good and beauty contains value connotation. As far as metaphysics is concerned, Professor Wang Lu emphasizes that metaphysical research "is" itself, but expressing metaphysical problems with "yes" is easy to lead the philosophical discussion of metaphysics to the perspective of language and logic. In addition to limiting the metaphysical object to "Yes" itself, Professor Wang Lu has repeatedly linked it to "transcendence". However, philosophy, as the theoretical form of grasping the world, is difficult to be confined to the domain of transcendence. Philosophy involves conceptual analysis at the formal level. Although analytical philosophy has the meaning of being seen in conceptual analysis, the operation of the concept itself is often regarded as the main or even the whole work of philosophy by emphasizing the logical analysis of the concept, and corresponding to it. How to achieve the real world and endow conceptual analysis with the connotation of wisdom is often out of sight.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學中國現(xiàn)代思想文化研究所暨哲學系;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地重大項目“事與物:古今中西之爭視域下中國現(xiàn)代形而上學的轉換”(16JJD720007) 國家社會科學基金重大項目“馮契哲學文獻整理與思想研究”(15ZDB012) 江蘇省“公民道德與社會風尚協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心”研究項目 上海社會科學創(chuàng)新基地華東師范大學“文化觀念與核心價值”項目
【分類號】：B01

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 倪梁康;;回應王路[J];中國現(xiàn)象學與哲學評論;2009年00期

2 江怡;規(guī)范的建立與思想的深刻——兼評王路的《走進分析哲學》[J];哲學研究;2000年03期

3 蔡祥元;;“存在”譯法是一種誤譯嗎——回應王路先生對“存在”譯法的質疑[J];中山大學學報(社會科學版);2013年03期

4 江怡;;為分析哲學一辯——評王路的《走進分析哲學》[J];社會科學管理與評論;2000年02期

5 張桂權;“真”能代替“真理”嗎?——就“真理”和“真”的辨別及譯名問題與王路先生商榷[J];世界哲學;2003年01期

6 王曉朝;eimi——卡恩的希臘ontology的語言學導論——與王路教授商榷[J];學術月刊;2004年06期

7 王路;論“真”與“真理”[J];中國社會科學;1996年06期

，

本文編號：2433558