中國與印度的古代思想比較——以儒道典籍和《薄伽梵歌》為參照
發(fā)布時間:2018-10-15 13:22
【摘要】:從中國的儒道典籍以及被譽為"古印度《道德經(jīng)》"的智慧典籍《薄伽梵歌》出發(fā),能發(fā)現(xiàn)中國與印度的古代思想在人性善惡關(guān)系、利義關(guān)系、萬物本源的哲學(xué)核心、人生追求的終極境界和生死輪回的觀念等五個方面存在驚人的相似性。不過,由于語言、文化以及地理條件等因素的不同,中國與印度的古代思想也表現(xiàn)出一定的差異性,主要體現(xiàn)在四個方面:"道"與"梵"的闡述方式差異、人格意識差異、追求"無為"的動機差異和實現(xiàn)和諧的方法差異。
[Abstract]:From the Confucian and Taoist books in China and the wisdom book "Bhagavad Gita" known as the "Ancient India", we can find the philosophical core of the relationship between good and evil in human nature, the relationship between benefit and righteousness, and the origin of all things in ancient China and India. There are amazing similarities in five aspects: the ultimate realm of life and the concept of life and death cycle. However, due to the differences in language, culture and geographical conditions, the ancient thoughts of China and India also show certain differences, which are mainly reflected in four aspects: differences in the way of "Tao" and "Vatican", and differences in personality consciousness. The difference of motive of pursuing "inaction" and the difference of method of achieving harmony.
【作者單位】: 東北師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部中國下一代教育基金會“十三五”科研規(guī)劃重點課題“教育均衡發(fā)展背景下的學(xué)校最優(yōu)化研究”(DCF130028)的子課題“儒道思想與古印度《薄伽梵歌》異同及背景分析”(DCF130028—JL0043)
【分類號】:B222;B351.2
本文編號:2272681
[Abstract]:From the Confucian and Taoist books in China and the wisdom book "Bhagavad Gita" known as the "Ancient India", we can find the philosophical core of the relationship between good and evil in human nature, the relationship between benefit and righteousness, and the origin of all things in ancient China and India. There are amazing similarities in five aspects: the ultimate realm of life and the concept of life and death cycle. However, due to the differences in language, culture and geographical conditions, the ancient thoughts of China and India also show certain differences, which are mainly reflected in four aspects: differences in the way of "Tao" and "Vatican", and differences in personality consciousness. The difference of motive of pursuing "inaction" and the difference of method of achieving harmony.
【作者單位】: 東北師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部中國下一代教育基金會“十三五”科研規(guī)劃重點課題“教育均衡發(fā)展背景下的學(xué)校最優(yōu)化研究”(DCF130028)的子課題“儒道思想與古印度《薄伽梵歌》異同及背景分析”(DCF130028—JL0043)
【分類號】:B222;B351.2
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 張紹斌;;老子之“道”和《薄伽梵歌》中的“原人”比較[J];南亞研究;2010年01期
2 李馨宇;孫晶;;《薄伽梵歌》的倫理道德觀解析[J];人文雜志;2012年02期
3 V.P.伐爾瑪;巫白慧;;現(xiàn)代的印度人道主義[J];哲學(xué)譯叢;1981年02期
4 胡玉忠;齊雪蓮;;淺析《薄伽梵歌》的人生哲學(xué)[J];天府新論;2008年S1期
5 李學(xué)飛;;得一和瑜伽——《道德經(jīng)》和《薄伽梵歌》終極情境分析[J];中華文化論壇;2013年01期
6 胡俊麟;;從《薄伽梵歌》窺探《摩訶婆羅多》的印度教存在主義蘊含[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué));2014年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李學(xué)飛;得一與瑜伽—《道德經(jīng)》和《薄伽梵歌》的人生論[D];四川省社會科學(xué)院;2013年
,本文編號:2272681
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2272681.html