女性主義方法論的批判與重構(gòu)——基于弗雷澤后現(xiàn)代女性主義理論的視域
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-07 09:18
【摘要】：20世紀(jì)80年代以來,女性主義與后現(xiàn)代主義相遇,圍繞著解構(gòu)主義、基礎(chǔ)主義和本質(zhì)主義等方法論難題而發(fā)生了無休止的爭(zhēng)論,在兩者的爭(zhēng)論交鋒中,早就有一種走出解構(gòu)主義的后現(xiàn)代主義女性主義動(dòng)向。解構(gòu)主義的策略盡管是必需的,但是隨著這一語境的隱退,后現(xiàn)代主義女性主義必須重構(gòu)它自己的方法論。與斯皮瓦克的"策略本質(zhì)主義"、巴特勒的"女性主義雙重運(yùn)動(dòng)"以及康奈爾的"解構(gòu)主義的女性主義"不同,弗雷澤把德里達(dá)和利奧塔的后現(xiàn)代主義思想與女性主義批判理論整合起來,從批判的維度重新審視了后現(xiàn)代主義與女性主義之間的沖突與張力,既吸收解構(gòu)主義批判中的獨(dú)特見解,又堅(jiān)持標(biāo)志著女性主義批判倫理主張的對(duì)抗政治改革,對(duì)后現(xiàn)代女性主義方法論進(jìn)行了多維重構(gòu)。從這個(gè)意義上說,弗雷澤的后現(xiàn)代女性主義方法論具有一定的前瞻性和超越性,對(duì)于女性主義朝向更完整和更多元的路線發(fā)展做出了重要貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, feminism and postmodernism have met, and there have been endless debates around methodological problems such as deconstruction, fundamentalism and essentialism. There has long been a trend of post-modernist feminism out of deconstruction. Although the strategy of deconstruction is necessary, with the retreat of this context, postmodernism feminism must reconstruct its own methodology. Different from Spivak's "Strategic essentialism", Butler's "Feminist dual Movement" and Cornell's "deconstruction Feminism", Fraser integrates Derrida and Liotta's postmodernism with feminist critical theory and reexamines the conflict and tension between postmodernism and feminism from the perspective of criticism. It not only absorbs the unique views of deconstruction critique, but also insists on the anti-political reform, which marks the ethical proposition of feminist criticism, and reconstructs the methodology of post-modern feminism in a multi-dimensional way. In this sense, Fraser's post-modern feminist methodology is forward-looking and transcendent, and has made an important contribution to the development of feminism towards a more complete and multi-dimensional line.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;南京大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)高級(jí)研究院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“弗雷澤女性主義批判理論的邏輯譜系及其現(xiàn)實(shí)啟示研究”(編號(hào):15BZX017)
【分類號(hào)】：B089
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, feminism and postmodernism have met, and there have been endless debates around methodological problems such as deconstruction, fundamentalism and essentialism. There has long been a trend of post-modernist feminism out of deconstruction. Although the strategy of deconstruction is necessary, with the retreat of this context, postmodernism feminism must reconstruct its own methodology. Different from Spivak's "Strategic essentialism", Butler's "Feminist dual Movement" and Cornell's "deconstruction Feminism", Fraser integrates Derrida and Liotta's postmodernism with feminist critical theory and reexamines the conflict and tension between postmodernism and feminism from the perspective of criticism. It not only absorbs the unique views of deconstruction critique, but also insists on the anti-political reform, which marks the ethical proposition of feminist criticism, and reconstructs the methodology of post-modern feminism in a multi-dimensional way. In this sense, Fraser's post-modern feminist methodology is forward-looking and transcendent, and has made an important contribution to the development of feminism towards a more complete and multi-dimensional line.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;南京大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)高級(jí)研究院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“弗雷澤女性主義批判理論的邏輯譜系及其現(xiàn)實(shí)啟示研究”(編號(hào):15BZX017)
【分類號(hào)】：B089
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 朱靜;;解讀后現(xiàn)代女性主義對(duì)科學(xué)知識(shí)的建構(gòu)[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2010年06期
2 李霞;后現(xiàn)代女性主義的困境及其可能出路[J];淄博學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 淮Z，
本文編號(hào)：2227837
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2227837.html
教材專著
