本文選題：亞圣 + 顏回　； 參考：《歷史研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：儒家"亞圣"名號從顏子到孟子的轉移,遠比人們過去所知的情況要復雜。在中古時期,顏回是長期獲得朝野主流承認的儒家"亞圣"。北宋熙豐新政中始以顏孟并配孔子,然受五賢信仰遺留影響牽制,孟子位次顏回,大體可稱"亞圣之次"。宋金對峙期間,南北廣泛出現(xiàn)兩個"亞圣"并稱的特殊現(xiàn)象,體現(xiàn)顏孟并配的常識化與理學道統(tǒng)說之初興。在宋高宗紹興之訓和朱熹《四書》構建的道統(tǒng)話語中,孟子地位及影響漸逾顏子,迨理宗綰合朝野道統(tǒng)論,官方頒示的《道統(tǒng)十三贊》首次舍顏子而獨稱孟子"亞圣"。隨著理學北傳,元文宗正式封孟子為"亞圣公",顏回則被改封"復圣公"。儒家"亞圣"名號從顏子到孟子的曲折變遷,映照出宋元時代理學道統(tǒng)論漸次興起及與政治體制互動整飭的圖景。
[Abstract]:The transfer of Confucian name from Yan Zi to Mencius is much more complicated than people used to know. In mid-ancient times, Yan Hui was long recognized by the mainstream of the ruling and opposition Confucian "Yasheng". The Northern Song Dynasty Xifeng New deal began with Yan Meng and Confucius, but influenced by the five sages, Mencius was second to Yan Hui. During the confrontation between Song and Jin dynasties, there were two special phenomena called "Yasheng" in the north and south, which reflected the common sense of Yan Meng-he and the doctrine of Neo-Confucianism and Taoism. In the Taoist discourse constructed by Shaoxing of Song Gaozong and Zhu Xi, Mencius' position and influence gradually outweigh Yan Zi, so that Lizong intertwined with the theory of ruling and opposition Taoism, and the official "13 praise of Taoism" was the first time that Mencius "Asaheng" was named "Asaheng" by dismissing Yan Zi for the first time. With the northward transmission of Neo-Confucianism, Mencius was officially declared the "Asaheng Gong" in the Yuan Dynasty, while Yan Hui was renamed the "Fu Sheng Gong". The tortuous changes from Yan Zi to Mencius in the name of "Yasheng" of Confucianism reflect the gradual rise of Neo-Confucianism and its interaction with political system in the Song and Yuan dynasties.
【作者單位】： 北京大學歷史學系;
【分類號】：B244

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 萬國崔;;二十世紀上半葉中華道統(tǒng)論三派概述[J];孔子研究;2012年06期

2 向世陵;;理學道統(tǒng)論的兩類文獻根據(jù)與實質[J];齊魯學刊;2008年06期

3 孔磊;;北宋道統(tǒng)論視域下的“尊荀”思潮淺述[J];江蘇廣播電視大學學報;2013年01期

4 覃曉婷;;晚清的理學復興與唐鑒的道統(tǒng)論——以《國朝學案小識》為中心[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2006年02期

5 楊紹祥;;論儒家思想中道統(tǒng)論的歷史演進[J];十堰職業(yè)技術學院學報;2010年02期

6 湯勤福;試論葉適的道統(tǒng)論[J];中州學刊;2001年03期

7 黨天正;韓愈道統(tǒng)論與傳統(tǒng)文化心理[J];寶雞文理學院學報(社會科學版);2002年02期

8 張連偉;;程朱道統(tǒng)論與儒家經(jīng)典認同[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);2014年04期

9 張佩;;近些年關于“道統(tǒng)”人物研究的綜述[J];船山學刊;2012年04期

10 陳暢;;論《明儒學案》的道統(tǒng)論話語建構[J];學海;2012年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 李靜;韓愈道統(tǒng)論研究[D];吉林大學;2007年

2 桑貞貞;道統(tǒng)論及其表現(xiàn)形式[D];福建師范大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2057627