本文選題：笛卡爾 + 馬里翁　； 參考：《世界哲學(xué)》2017年04期

【摘要】：馬里翁認(rèn)為在笛卡爾的哲學(xué)中存在著兩種不同的本體—神學(xué)—論思想,一種以自我為基礎(chǔ)(其基本的表達(dá)式是"ego cogito,ergo sum"),一種以上帝為核心(其基本的表達(dá)式是"ego sum,ego existo"),前者是一種并不完備的形而上學(xué),后者則展現(xiàn)了笛卡爾的一種成熟的形而上學(xué)思想。但是,關(guān)于笛卡爾的這種成熟的形而上學(xué)思想及其體系,馬里翁在其《笛卡爾哲學(xué)問(wèn)題:方法與形而上學(xué)》和《笛卡爾哲學(xué)問(wèn)題II:自我和上帝》中分別給出了兩種并不相同的解釋,本文認(rèn)為我們可以大體上認(rèn)可馬里翁的第一種解釋,同時(shí)應(yīng)該對(duì)他的第二種解釋保持謹(jǐn)慎態(tài)度。
[Abstract]:Marion believes that there are two different ontology-theo-theoretical ideas in Descartes' philosophy. One is self-based (its basic expression is "ego cogitoergo sum"), the other is more than the emperor (its basic expression is "ego existo"), the former is a kind of incomplete metaphysics, while the latter shows a mature metaphysical thought of Descartes. But about Descartes' mature metaphysics and its system, Marion gives two different interpretations in Descartes philosophical problems: method and Metaphysics, and Descartes philosophical problem II: self and God, respectively. This paper holds that we can generally agree with the first interpretation of Marion. At the same time, he should be cautious about his second interpretation.
【作者單位】： 南開(kāi)大學(xué)哲學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：B565.21;B565.59
，

本文編號(hào)：2050858