本文選題：意識(shí)形態(tài) + 沖突��； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：全球化是當(dāng)今世界不可扭轉(zhuǎn)的歷史進(jìn)程,隨著全球化進(jìn)程的不斷加快,文化交流與融合的全球化態(tài)勢(shì)逐漸增強(qiáng),與之相伴的還有來自世界上不同民族和國(guó)家的文化及價(jià)值觀巨大矛盾和沖突。從本質(zhì)上看,價(jià)值觀是意識(shí)形態(tài)的主要構(gòu)成部分,甚至處于其核心位置。因此,價(jià)值觀的矛盾和沖突背后必然暗含著意識(shí)形態(tài)之間的矛盾和沖突。從淺層意義上看,意識(shí)形態(tài)沖突之所以成為當(dāng)前人們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),很大程度上是由全球化促生的。這一問題的突出,也逐漸引起了人們的探討和反思。但當(dāng)人們?cè)谔接懭蚧瘯r(shí)代意識(shí)形態(tài)沖突問題的時(shí)候,總是微觀地、片面地分析,而往往忽略了與其他社會(huì)因素之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性。意識(shí)形態(tài)之間的沖突不能只被認(rèn)為是由全球性的文化和價(jià)值觀的交流造成的,事實(shí)上這種沖突有著深刻的根源。全球化作為一種客觀的歷史進(jìn)程,是由西方資本主義主導(dǎo)的,是伴隨著西方資本主義工業(yè)革命和世界市場(chǎng)的出現(xiàn)而產(chǎn)生的。因此,全球化與生俱來就有著與西方資本主義社會(huì)相適應(yīng)的現(xiàn)代性機(jī)制和文化。眾所周知,現(xiàn)代性事實(shí)上是一種關(guān)于當(dāng)今人類生活方式的表達(dá),它自身體現(xiàn)著一定意義的價(jià)值層面的訴求。因此,源自于西方的現(xiàn)代性文化在一定程度上與全球化的文化表達(dá)呈現(xiàn)出一致性態(tài)勢(shì),并逐漸在全球化時(shí)代的文化交流和融合中占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位,控制著全球化時(shí)代文化和意識(shí)形態(tài)的話語權(quán)。其他民族和國(guó)家的文化及意識(shí)形態(tài)都不可避免地被其入侵和滲透,由此可見,矛盾和沖突自然爆發(fā)。故而,在全球化時(shí)代的文化和意識(shí)形態(tài)交流碰撞的過程中,源自于西方的現(xiàn)代性就逐漸成為人們認(rèn)識(shí)不同國(guó)家和民族間文化意識(shí)形態(tài)矛盾和沖突發(fā)生的一個(gè)重要切入點(diǎn)和視角�，F(xiàn)代性具有一個(gè)很強(qiáng)的本性,那就是在全球范圍內(nèi)極力擴(kuò)張,伴隨著它的擴(kuò)張和發(fā)展,其他民族和國(guó)家不自覺地被其逐漸感染,進(jìn)而也邁入了對(duì)其追求和發(fā)展的歷史進(jìn)程之中。我國(guó)當(dāng)然也深受其影響,尤其是在改革開放之后,這種追求和向往曾一度達(dá)到高潮。至此,這種源自于西方的現(xiàn)代性思想和價(jià)值理念以各種途徑普遍深入到我國(guó)社會(huì)發(fā)展和人們的現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中。我國(guó)在實(shí)施現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)和現(xiàn)代性建構(gòu)過程中,來自族內(nèi)的傳統(tǒng)文化與來自西方的現(xiàn)代性文化共時(shí)性并存且處于矛盾沖突與滲透交融的過程中。意識(shí)形態(tài)的構(gòu)成與文化之間是密切相關(guān)的。因此,現(xiàn)代性文化意識(shí)形態(tài)的全球擴(kuò)張和發(fā)展也必然沖擊著我國(guó)的文化及意識(shí)形態(tài)建設(shè)。這就迫切要求我們做出正確抉擇:首先我們要堅(jiān)持本民族文化意識(shí)形態(tài)的主導(dǎo)地位不動(dòng)搖,其次要正確認(rèn)識(shí)現(xiàn)代性文化意識(shí)形態(tài)的存在,同時(shí)要采取一些積極有效的意識(shí)形態(tài)建設(shè)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的文化策略。只有做出這樣的選擇,才能從根本上搞好我們自身的文化意識(shí)形態(tài)建設(shè),我們才能使其為我國(guó)現(xiàn)代化的建設(shè)匯聚強(qiáng)大的力量。
[Abstract]:Globalization is an irrevocable historical process in today's world. With the continuous acceleration of globalization, the trend of globalization of cultural exchange and integration is gradually strengthened. It is accompanied by great conflicts and conflicts of cultures and values from different nations and nations in the world. In essence, values are the main component of ideology, even in its core position. Therefore, the contradiction and conflict of values must contain the contradiction and conflict between ideology. In shallow sense, ideological conflicts have become the focus of attention, to a large extent, promoted by globalization. This problem is prominent, also caused people's discussion and reflection gradually. However, when people are discussing the ideological conflict in the era of globalization, they always analyze it microscopically and one-sidedly, and often ignore the correlation with other social factors. Ideological conflicts cannot be considered to be caused solely by the global exchange of cultures and values; in fact, they have deep roots. Globalization, as an objective historical process, is dominated by western capitalism and comes into being with the emergence of the western capitalist industrial revolution and the world market. Therefore, globalization is born with modern mechanism and culture adapted to western capitalist society. As we all know, modernity is in fact an expression of the human way of life, which embodies a certain meaning of the value of the appeal. Therefore, the modern culture, which originated from the West, to some extent shows the same situation with the cultural expression of globalization, and gradually occupies a dominant position in the cultural exchange and integration in the era of globalization. It controls the discourse of culture and ideology in the era of globalization. The culture and ideology of other nations and nations are inevitably invaded and infiltrated. Therefore, in the process of cultural and ideological exchange and collision in the era of globalization, modernity from the West has gradually become an important entry point and perspective for people to understand the cultural and ideological contradictions and conflicts between different countries and nations. Modernity has a strong nature, that is, in the global scope of expansion, with its expansion and development, other nations and countries unconsciously gradually infected, and then into its pursuit and development of the historical process. Of course, China is also deeply influenced, especially after the reform and opening up, this pursuit and yearning once reached a climax. So far, this kind of modernity thought and the value idea which originated from the West have penetrated into our social development and people's real life in all kinds of ways. In the process of modernization construction and modernity construction in China, the traditional culture from the clan coexists with the modernity culture from the West and is in the process of contradiction, conflict and infiltration. The composition of ideology is closely related to culture. Therefore, the global expansion and development of modern cultural ideology will inevitably impact our cultural and ideological construction. This urgently requires us to make the right choice: first, we must adhere to the dominant position of our national cultural ideology, and secondly, we must correctly understand the existence of modern cultural ideology. At the same time, we should take some positive and effective ideology construction and competitive cultural strategies. Only by making such a choice can we fundamentally do a good job in the construction of our own cultural ideology, and we can make it gather powerful forces for the construction of our country's modernization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D815;B036

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓艷;;全球化時(shí)代文化沖突的現(xiàn)代性根源析論[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2016年02期

2 劉懷光;靳陽陽;;文化現(xiàn)代性的現(xiàn)代性根源與矛盾析論[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2015年03期

3 韓艷;;論現(xiàn)代性的文化意蘊(yùn)與文化全球化[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

4 劉懷光;李想;;論文化軟實(shí)力形成發(fā)展的全球化依據(jù)[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2014年11期

5 劉懷光;劉若飛;;文化全球化的根據(jù):共同生活的現(xiàn)代性訴求[J];中州學(xué)刊;2014年10期

6 莫其遜;;論全球化文化現(xiàn)象背后的文化沖突和差異[J];百色學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

7 郗戈;;從資本邏輯看現(xiàn)代性邏輯的生成與發(fā)展[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;2010年01期

8 徐曉丹;中西文化的差異與全球化框架下的文化整合[J];理論探討;2004年02期

9 趙景來;文化全球化研究論略[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2003年05期

10 鮑宗豪;論文化全球化——兼談民族文化的保護(hù)和發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉娜;全球化進(jìn)程中的意識(shí)形態(tài)問題研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉若飛;文化全球化的共同生活機(jī)制研究[D];河南師范大學(xué);2015年

2 余兢成;當(dāng)代中國(guó)文化沖突境遇下的主流意識(shí)形態(tài)建設(shè)[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

3 李琳琳;當(dāng)前我國(guó)社會(huì)主義主流意識(shí)形態(tài)建設(shè)研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1984629