本文選題：實(shí)踐 + 認(rèn)識(shí)　； 參考：《華僑大學(xué)》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來(lái),我國(guó)馬克思主義理論研究呈現(xiàn)出多樣化的研究局面。這些馬克思主義研究者,由于自身不同的學(xué)術(shù)背景、學(xué)術(shù)能力和學(xué)術(shù)旨趣等諸多原因,其中有繼承與發(fā)揚(yáng)以實(shí)踐為基礎(chǔ)的馬克思認(rèn)識(shí)論,推進(jìn)其中國(guó)化過(guò)程,為解決我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題提供理論指導(dǎo),但也有部分研究者存在庸俗化理解、誤讀、曲解的研究問(wèn)題。因此,在這篇論文中,我們選擇馬克思的實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論作為我們的研究課題,不僅因?yàn)閷?shí)踐與認(rèn)識(shí)關(guān)系問(wèn)題是馬克思認(rèn)識(shí)論研究的基礎(chǔ)問(wèn)題、核心問(wèn)題,是掌握馬克思認(rèn)識(shí)論的認(rèn)識(shí)立場(chǎng)、原則與目的的重要抓手,更是新時(shí)期我國(guó)改革開放與現(xiàn)代化實(shí)踐的理論需要。因此,論文分析前馬克思的三位哲學(xué)家康德、黑格爾、費(fèi)爾巴哈各自基于對(duì)實(shí)踐的不同理解而形成唯心主義或直觀唯物主義認(rèn)識(shí)論,剖析了他們的認(rèn)識(shí)論與馬克思的實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)與差異問(wèn)題。在此基礎(chǔ)上,論文從實(shí)踐概念演變分析了馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的形成歷程,從大學(xué)理性主義認(rèn)識(shí)到過(guò)渡時(shí)期唯物主義的認(rèn)識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)向、從《論猶太人問(wèn)題》和《黑格爾法哲學(xué)批判導(dǎo)言》中出現(xiàn)新的實(shí)踐思維到《1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》中以異化勞動(dòng)為基礎(chǔ)的認(rèn)識(shí)思維,直到《關(guān)于費(fèi)爾巴哈的提綱》和《德意志意識(shí)形態(tài)》兩部著作馬克思才真正確立了科學(xué)的實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論。在此基礎(chǔ)上,論文通過(guò)《關(guān)于費(fèi)爾巴哈的提綱》和《德意志意識(shí)形態(tài)》兩部著作深入闡述了馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的本質(zhì)內(nèi)涵,與此同時(shí),還進(jìn)一步分析了馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的具體內(nèi)容,包括人的實(shí)踐結(jié)構(gòu)、實(shí)踐思維、主客體關(guān)系以及認(rèn)識(shí)目的等等。論文還研究了馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的繼承者列寧和毛澤東的唯物辯證認(rèn)識(shí)論。他們不僅繼承了馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的活的靈魂,還科學(xué)地指導(dǎo)了無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)的革命解放運(yùn)動(dòng)。論文最后分析了馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論在中國(guó)當(dāng)代現(xiàn)代化的理論活動(dòng)與實(shí)踐活動(dòng)的作用�？梢哉f(shuō),通過(guò)本論文的研究,我們可以更好地理解馬克思實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)論的內(nèi)在品質(zhì),為我們?cè)诶碚撗芯可咸峁┝烁玫睦碚摿?chǎng)與研究視域,在實(shí)踐中也能為我們提供基本的認(rèn)識(shí)立場(chǎng)、方法與價(jià)值原則。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the theoretical study of Marxism in China presents a diversified research situation. These Marxist researchers, due to their different academic backgrounds, academic ability and academic purport, have inherited and carried forward the Marxist epistemology based on practice to promote the process of Sinicization. In order to solve the practical problems of our country, some researchers have the problems of vulgarization, misreading and misinterpretation. Therefore, in this paper, we choose Marx's practical epistemology as our research topic, not only because the relationship between practice and cognition is the basic problem of Marx's epistemology research, but also the core issue. It is an important grasp of Marxist epistemology's cognitive stand, principle and purpose, and is also the theoretical need of our country's reform and opening up and modernization practice in the new period. Therefore, the paper analyzes the three former Marx philosophers Kant, Hegel, Feuerbach based on the different understanding of practice to form idealism or intuitive materialism epistemology. This paper analyzes the internal relation and difference between their epistemology and Marx's practical epistemology. On this basis, the paper analyzes the forming process of Marx's practical epistemology from the evolution of the concept of practice, from the cognition of university rationalism to the cognition of materialism in the transitional period. From "on the Jewish problem" and "introduction to the criticism of Hegel's philosophy of Law", there appears new practical thinking to the cognitive thinking based on alienated labor in the manuscript of Economics and philosophy in 1844. It was not until the outline of Feuerbach and the German ideology did Marx establish the scientific practical epistemology. On this basis, the paper elaborates the essential connotation of Marx's practical epistemology through "outline on Feuerbach" and "German ideology". It also analyzes the concrete contents of Marx's practical epistemology, including human's practical structure, practical thinking, subject-object relationship and cognitive purpose. The thesis also studies the materialistic dialectical epistemology of Lenin and Mao Zedong, the successors of Marx's practical epistemology. They not only inherited the living soul of Marx's practical epistemology, but also scientifically guided the revolutionary liberation movement of the proletariat. Finally, the paper analyzes the role of Marx's practical epistemology in the theoretical and practical activities of contemporary modernization in China. It can be said that through the study of this paper, we can better understand the inherent quality of Marx's practical epistemology, and provide us with a better theoretical position and research horizon in theoretical research. In practice can also provide us with a basic understanding of the position, methods and value principles.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B023
，

本文編號(hào)：1948224