本文選題：中間階級 + 馬克思和恩格斯　； 參考：《天津社會科學》2017年04期

【摘要】：賴特提出了關于資本主義社會中間階級發(fā)展趨勢的"馬克思主義理論假說"和"后工業(yè)社會理論假說",并通過實證研究得出馬克思主義"兩極分化"的階級結構假說有誤的結論。賴特忽視了馬克思恩格斯關于資本主義社會發(fā)展的兩種模式理論,并誤認為他們對"中間階級"的關注不足。事實上,隨著資本主義生產(chǎn)發(fā)展的深入,中間階級在人數(shù)和種類上皆會增加。由此從理論前提上推翻了賴特對經(jīng)典馬克思主義關于中間階級發(fā)展趨勢預測的假說。
[Abstract]:Wright put forward the Marxist theoretical hypothesis and the postindustrial society hypothesis about the development trend of the middle class in the capitalist society, and obtained the class structure of Marxism "polarization" through the empirical research. The hypothesis has a wrong conclusion. Wright ignored Marx and Engels' theory of two models on the development of capitalist society and mistook that they did not pay enough attention to the "middle class". In fact, with the development of capitalist production, the number and variety of the middle class will increase. Therefore, the hypothesis of Wright's prediction of the development trend of the middle class of classical Marxism is overturned from the theoretical premise.
【作者單位】： 北京大學哲學系博士后流動站;
【分類號】：B089.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 陳波;在分析傳統(tǒng)和詮釋學傳統(tǒng)之間─—馮·賴特的學術貢獻[J];湘潭師范學院學報(社會科學版);2001年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 孫慧;賴特資本主義階級結構理論研究[D];南京師范大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1899303