發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-17 01:27

  本文選題：中間階級(jí) + 馬克思和恩格斯��； 參考：《天津社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年04期

【摘要】：賴特提出了關(guān)于資本主義社會(huì)中間階級(jí)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的"馬克思主義理論假說"和"后工業(yè)社會(huì)理論假說",并通過實(shí)證研究得出馬克思主義"兩極分化"的階級(jí)結(jié)構(gòu)假說有誤的結(jié)論。賴特忽視了馬克思恩格斯關(guān)于資本主義社會(huì)發(fā)展的兩種模式理論,并誤認(rèn)為他們對(duì)"中間階級(jí)"的關(guān)注不足。事實(shí)上,隨著資本主義生產(chǎn)發(fā)展的深入,中間階級(jí)在人數(shù)和種類上皆會(huì)增加。由此從理論前提上推翻了賴特對(duì)經(jīng)典馬克思主義關(guān)于中間階級(jí)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)預(yù)測(cè)的假說。
[Abstract]:Wright put forward the Marxist theoretical hypothesis and the postindustrial society hypothesis about the development trend of the middle class in the capitalist society, and obtained the class structure of Marxism "polarization" through the empirical research. The hypothesis has a wrong conclusion. Wright ignored Marx and Engels' theory of two models on the development of capitalist society and mistook that they did not pay enough attention to the "middle class". In fact, with the development of capitalist production, the number and variety of the middle class will increase. Therefore, the hypothesis of Wright's prediction of the development trend of the middle class of classical Marxism is overturned from the theoretical premise.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)哲學(xué)系博士后流動(dòng)站;
【分類號(hào)】：B089.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳波;在分析傳統(tǒng)和詮釋學(xué)傳統(tǒng)之間─—馮·賴特的學(xué)術(shù)貢獻(xiàn)[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫慧;賴特資本主義階級(jí)結(jié)構(gòu)理論研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1899303