本文選題：財(cái)產(chǎn) + 財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：洛克將私有財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)視為一種自然權(quán)利,這種財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的本質(zhì)在于沒有經(jīng)過所有者的同意,其他人或者政府就無權(quán)侵犯個(gè)人的財(cái)產(chǎn)。為了對(duì)私有財(cái)產(chǎn)及其權(quán)利之自然性進(jìn)行證明,洛克從四個(gè)神學(xué)前提——原初的共有財(cái)產(chǎn)、平等的權(quán)利、根本的自然法和勞動(dòng)——出發(fā),從人類需求的滿足和勞動(dòng)占有理論兩條路徑進(jìn)行論證,而勞動(dòng)占有理論的推進(jìn)又包含自我所有權(quán)和混合論證兩個(gè)部分。洛克的這些論證在很大程度上確立了私有財(cái)產(chǎn)及其權(quán)利的自然性,同時(shí)也受到諸多學(xué)者的質(zhì)疑和批判。
[Abstract]:Locke regards private property rights as a natural right. The essence of this property right is that no other person or government has the right to violate personal property without the consent of the owner. In order to prove the naturality of private property and its rights, Locke proceeded from four theological premises-the original common property, equal rights, fundamental natural law and labor- The theory of labor possession consists of two parts: self-ownership and mixed argument. To a great extent, Locke's argument established the naturalness of private property and its rights, and was questioned and criticized by many scholars.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)哲學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：B561.24
，

本文編號(hào)：1876599