本文選題：有無之辯 + 邁農��； 參考：《江漢論壇》2017年03期

【摘要】：中西方哲學有無之辯的比較研究盡管取得了大量積極成果,但也存在著一個不容小覷的缺陷,那就是,已有研究對19世紀末由邁農所建立的非存在理論及其所引發(fā)的曠日持久的、富有西方特色的有無之辯缺乏足夠的了解和認知。而這一集多學科于一體的有無之辯代表的恰恰是西方有無之辯的最高成就和個性。西方現(xiàn)當代的有無之辯之所以后來居上,一是得益于分析方法的廣泛運用,二是得益于邏輯學、語義學、語言哲學、心靈哲學、虛構哲學等的全面介入,甚至有與具體科學的互動。
[Abstract]:Although the comparative study of Chinese and Western philosophy has achieved a great deal of positive results, it also has a flaw that cannot be underestimated, that is, There has been a lack of sufficient understanding and cognition of the theory of nonexistence established by Mannon at the end of the 19th century and the long-lasting debate about whether or not it is rich in western characteristics. This multi-disciplinary debate represents the highest achievement and personality of western debate. The reason why modern and contemporary debate in the West transcends the former is that it benefits from the extensive application of analytical methods, and from the comprehensive intervention of logic, semantics, linguistic philosophy, philosophy of mind, fictional philosophy, etc. There is even interaction with specific science.
【作者單位】： 華中師范大學哲學系;
【分類號】：B516.59

【相似文獻】

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 蔣曦 復旦大學哲學學院;邁農為情感與理智尋找精巧的平衡[N];中國社會科學報;2010年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 蔣曦;作為“對象”的價值[D];復旦大學;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 侯廣平;邁農的對象理論到胡塞爾的連續(xù)統(tǒng)理論[D];華東師范大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1787011