發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-18 05:28

  本文選題：克　切入點(diǎn)：能　出處：《孔子研究》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：東亞儒學(xué)有關(guān)"克己"的詮釋紛爭,表面看來是尊"朱"與反"朱"勢力的角逐,實(shí)質(zhì)蘊(yùn)涵著不同的自我觀。"克"—"己"之間存在一種表里結(jié)構(gòu):訓(xùn)"克"為"能"者,視自我為(全)善,因而只需逆覺體證、發(fā)揮本心,突出強(qiáng)調(diào)主體的能動(dòng)作用,此解以楊簡為代表;訓(xùn)"克"為"勝"者,察覺自我有惡,故當(dāng)依循天理、尊崇道心,側(cè)重揭橥規(guī)范的塑造意義,此解以朱熹為宗主。兩類訓(xùn)釋的核心分歧在于:挺立道德自我所采取的路徑有所不同;至于清代毛奇齡、顏元等人,擁立馬融以駁斥朱熹,雖在思想史上有其特定的意義,但未能深入義理層面,辨識(shí)"朱注"對"馬注"的轉(zhuǎn)進(jìn)之功。
[Abstract]:On the surface, the dispute over the interpretation of Confucianism in East Asia about "self-denial" seems to be a contest between the "Zhu" and anti-Zhu forces, which in essence implies different views of self. There is a superficial structure between "overbearing" and "oneself", that is, to teach the "overlord" to "be able". Regard self as (all) good, so you only need to counteract physical evidence, give play to your heart, and highlight the active role of the subject. This solution is represented by Yang Jian. Those who are taught to "conquer" as "victors" are aware of their own evil, so they should follow the principles of heaven and respect the Tao. The core difference between the two types of interpretation lies in the different paths taken by standing up for moral self; as for Mao Qiling, Yan Yuan, et al. In the Qing Dynasty, Ma Rong was supported by Ma Rong to refute Zhu Xi. Although it has its special significance in the history of thought, it fails to go deep into the level of justice and theory, and to distinguish the progress of Zhu Note and Ma Note.
【作者單位】： 海南大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)研究中心;
【基金】：2016年國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):16CZX031)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：B222

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 金小方;;唐君毅哲學(xué)中的“道德自我”概念[J];孔子研究;2009年05期

2 樊志輝 ,王德茜;本心與道德自我——唐君毅中心觀念的確立及限制[J];通化師院學(xué)報(bào);1994年01期

3 熊呂茂;;論唐君毅的道德觀[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王怡心;從道德自我到心靈境界——唐君毅形上學(xué)研究[D];北京大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1628225