發(fā)布時間：2018-03-13 09:08

  本文選題：印度知識傳統(tǒng)　切入點：“明”　出處：《自然辯證法研究》2017年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】："明"是印度知識傳統(tǒng)中的核心象征,它往往被研究者理解為"科學";通過這種欠缺檢討性做法,現(xiàn)代自然、社會、人文科學言說中的印度知識傳統(tǒng)獲得了各種與現(xiàn)代科學類似的范疇。但是,將西方知識傳統(tǒng)的范疇應用到印度知識傳統(tǒng),無益于人們了解印度本己的知識經(jīng)驗。通過對古典哲學中"科學"與印度語境中"明"的回溯,可以看到:"明"不是科學,而是純粹的技藝,印度知識傳統(tǒng)中并沒有古典哲學意義上的理性科學。
[Abstract]:"Ming" is the core symbol of India's intellectual tradition, which is often understood by researchers as "science"; through this lack of self-criticism, modern nature, society, The Indian tradition of knowledge in the discourse of the humanities has acquired various categories similar to those of modern science. However, the category of western traditional knowledge has been applied to the Indian tradition of knowledge. It is not good for people to understand the knowledge and experience of India. By looking back at the "science" in classical philosophy and the "light" in the context of India, we can see that "Ming" is not science, but pure skill. There is no rational science in the sense of classical philosophy in Indian knowledge tradition.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學人文社會科學高等研究院;
【基金】：重慶市社會科學規(guī)劃博士項目“印度知識(‘科學’)傳統(tǒng)”(2016BS063) 重慶大學中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務費(2017CDJSK47YJ10)
【分類號】：B351

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 戴阿寶;知識傳統(tǒng)批判與后知識話語之可能[J];文史哲;2004年06期

，

本文編號：1605715