本文關(guān)鍵詞： 淮南子 天人感應(yīng) 精氣說 春秋繁露　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：《淮南子》作為漢初黃老學(xué)的總結(jié)性著作1,處于中國古代學(xué)術(shù)從先秦子學(xué)到漢代經(jīng)學(xué)的轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)上。它的天人感應(yīng)思想內(nèi)涵豐富而有特色,廣泛吸收了前代各種天人感應(yīng)論并借助"氣"的學(xué)說融匯成一個系統(tǒng)。然而其天人感應(yīng)思想長期以來并未得到學(xué)界應(yīng)有的重視,故比較具有研究價值。緒論中追溯《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的歷史淵源,梳理了中國古代天人感應(yīng)論從簡單、樸素的社會觀念到系統(tǒng)化理論化的思想的發(fā)展歷程。指明天人感應(yīng)論是中國古代敬天尊天的文化傳統(tǒng)的產(chǎn)物,其倫理維度始終大于神學(xué)維度。進(jìn)一步由漢初的思想氛圍分析為何"究天人之際"成為了時代主題,以及為何《淮南子》的天人感應(yīng)論足以稱為一種"思想"。第一章對《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的梳理。本文將《淮南子》的"氣化宇宙論" 視為其天人感應(yīng)思想得以成立的基礎(chǔ),以"精氣說"作為《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想成立的關(guān)鍵,以"道德論"作為《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的價值旨?xì)w。第二章分析了《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的特質(zhì)。指出其最大特點(diǎn)是立足于道家天人之學(xué)的大框架來吸收融匯各種天人感應(yīng)論,這一點(diǎn)體現(xiàn)了漢初黃老之學(xué)的強(qiáng)大包容性。其次,本文探究了《淮南子》天人哲學(xué)中"天"與"道"的確切關(guān)系,從而指明其天人感應(yīng)論乃是道主導(dǎo)和規(guī)定下的天人感應(yīng)論,這一點(diǎn)可與董仲舒的天人感應(yīng)思想作對比。最后,本文強(qiáng)調(diào)《淮南子》的天人感應(yīng)思想基本貫徹了其氣化論的立場,并肯定其文本中體現(xiàn)的自然主義態(tài)度和存疑精神。第三章關(guān)注《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的歷史地位和現(xiàn)代評價問題。指明現(xiàn)代學(xué)者對古代天人感應(yīng)思想的研究基本指向董仲舒而極少關(guān)注《淮南子》,是由于對漢代思想的簡單化概念化處理。通過與董仲舒的天人感應(yīng)思想進(jìn)行對比研究,指出二者精神主旨的巨大不同,以突出《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的獨(dú)特價值和歷史地位。在現(xiàn)代評價問題上,本文強(qiáng)調(diào)要從學(xué)界對古代天人感應(yīng)論的某些固有印象中跳出來,要把握《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想中主導(dǎo)性的特點(diǎn),并充分理解其"以事論道"的表達(dá)習(xí)慣,以及帶著存疑精神去審視其人文價值和科學(xué)價值。本文以中國古代天人之學(xué)的發(fā)展為背景,梳理了《淮南子》天人感應(yīng)思想的內(nèi)涵、特質(zhì)和歷史地位。一方面注意《淮南子》與先秦學(xué)術(shù)的關(guān)系,挖掘其天人感應(yīng)說的思想淵源,尤其重視其所受老莊道家和黃老道家之影響。另一方面注意漢初思想界之氛圍,并把大約同時代的《淮南子》與董仲舒的天人感應(yīng)思想進(jìn)行比較研究。本文不重在批判,而強(qiáng)調(diào)同情地理解,以盡量還原其思想的本來面目。
[Abstract]:Huainan Zi, as a summative work of Huang-Lao School in the early Han Dynasty, is at the turning point of ancient Chinese learning from the pre-Qin Dynasty to the Han Dynasty. The theory of "Qi" has been merged into a system by absorbing all kinds of theory of induction of Heaven and Man of the previous generation. However, the thought of "Induction of Heaven and Man" has not been paid the attention that the academic circles should pay attention to for a long time. Therefore, the comparison has the research value. In the introduction, tracing back to the historical origin of the thought of "Tianren Induction" in "Huainan Zi", combing the ancient Chinese theory of "the Induction of Heaven and Man" from the simple, The development course from simple social concept to systematized theorized thought. It is pointed out that the theory of human and heaven induction is the product of the cultural tradition of respecting heaven and respecting heaven in ancient China. Its ethical dimension is always larger than theological dimension. Further analysis of the ideological atmosphere in the early Han Dynasty why "studying the time of Heaven and Man" has become the theme of the times. And why Huainan Zi's theory of human and heaven induction is enough to be called a kind of "thought". The first chapter systematically combs the connotation of "Huainan Zi" 's theory of human and heaven induction. In this paper, "Gasification Cosmology" of "Huainan Zi" is regarded as "Gasification Cosmology". The foundation on which his thoughts of heavenly and human induction were founded, Taking "Qi of essence" as the key to the establishment of the idea of "feeling between Heaven and Man" in "Huainan Zi", Taking "moral theory" as the value purport of "Huainan Zi", the second chapter analyzes the characteristics of "Huainan Zi" "Heaven and Human Inductive thought", and points out that its biggest characteristic is to absorb it based on the big frame of Taoism's study of Heaven and Man. Fusion of various theories of Induction between Heaven and Man, Secondly, this paper explores the exact relationship between "Heaven" and "Tao" in the philosophy of Heaven and Man in Huainan Zi, and points out that the theory of Heaven and Human Induction is the theory of Heaven and Human Induction under the guidance and stipulation of Tao. This point can be compared with Dong Zhongshu's theory of human and heaven induction. Finally, this paper emphasizes that the "Huainan son" 's theory of "human and heaven induction" basically carries out its position of "Gasification Theory". The third chapter focuses on the historical status and modern evaluation of the thought of "Huainan Zi", and points out the basis of the research on the ancient thought of "the induction of Heaven and Man" by modern scholars. This article points to Dong Zhongshu and pays little attention to Huainan Zi, because of the simplified conceptualization of Han Dynasty thoughts. It is pointed out that there is a great difference between the two spiritual gist in order to highlight the unique value and historical status of the idea of the induction of Heaven and Man. On the issue of modern evaluation, this paper emphasizes that we should jump out of some inherent impressions of the ancient theory of the induction of Heaven and Man in academic circles. It is necessary to grasp the dominant characteristics of the "Huainan Zi" thought of human induction, and to fully understand its expression habits of "discussing the Tao by matter". And to examine its humanistic value and scientific value with the spirit of doubt. This paper, based on the development of the study of Heaven and Man in ancient China, combs the connotation of "Huainan Zi" the thought of Heaven and Man Induction. On the one hand, we should pay attention to the relationship between Huainan Zi and the pre-Qin academic, dig out the ideological origin of his theory of human and nature induction, and pay particular attention to the influence of the Taoists of Laozhuang and Huanglao Taoism on the other hand, and pay attention to the atmosphere of the ideological circle in the early Han Dynasty on the other hand. A comparative study of the thoughts of "Huainan Zi" and Dong Zhongshu about the same era is made. This paper emphasizes understanding sympathetically rather than criticizing it, in order to restore the true nature of his thought as far as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B234.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 許抗生;;《淮南子》論“道”[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 潘秋平;《淮南子》醫(yī)學(xué)思想研究[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2008年

2 林琳;《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》與《淮南子》比較研究[D];遼寧中醫(yī)學(xué)院;2003年

3 馬慶洲;《淮南子》研究[D];北京大學(xué);2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 朱新林;淮南子陰陽五行思想研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

2 章曉丹;《淮南子》的生態(tài)世界觀簡論[D];西北大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1496295