本文關(guān)鍵詞：錢澄之易學(xué)研究　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 錢澄之 河圖洛書 太極 陰陽(yáng) 以史證易

【摘要】：錢澄之是明末清初之際著名的易學(xué)家與詩(shī)學(xué)家。錢澄之易學(xué)從象數(shù)易學(xué)入手,后來(lái)對(duì)朱熹的易學(xué)觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了繼承與闡發(fā)。錢澄之集眾易學(xué)家思想之所長(zhǎng),他的易學(xué)有一種“漢宋兼采”的特點(diǎn),易學(xué)思想比較博雜。錢澄之易學(xué)不僅匯納了各家易學(xué)之長(zhǎng),而且也發(fā)揚(yáng)了宋代以史證易的解易特點(diǎn),還有一種經(jīng)世致用的學(xué)術(shù)旨向。本論文是對(duì)錢澄之易學(xué)思想的專題研究,主要從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行討論。 引言簡(jiǎn)要介紹了錢澄之易學(xué)研究?jī)r(jià)值,并對(duì)學(xué)界對(duì)錢澄之易學(xué)研究成果進(jìn)行梳理,指出當(dāng)前對(duì)錢澄之易學(xué)研究所存在的缺失和不足,提出本論文的寫作思路與方法。 第一章是對(duì)錢澄之生平事略及著述的介紹。錢澄之生活于明清易代之際,少年時(shí)期良好的家庭教育為錢澄之研究學(xué)術(shù)打下了一個(gè)良好的基礎(chǔ)。中年時(shí)期遭遇黨禍,逃亡于福建、廣州等地�！痘饌鳌芳词窃谔油鲞^程中所寫。晚年回歸故里后,刪定舊說(shuō),增補(bǔ)新解,開始撰寫《田間易學(xué)》。 第二章主要是對(duì)錢澄之易學(xué)淵源及治易歷程的研究。首先對(duì)周易的流變進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明。其次從家世學(xué)易,師承于黃道周、問易于好友三個(gè)方面對(duì)錢澄之易學(xué)淵源進(jìn)行分析。然后對(duì)錢澄之寫作《田間易學(xué)》的過程及《田間易學(xué)》的刊刻過程進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要概述。 第三章主要是對(duì)錢澄之易學(xué)基本觀點(diǎn)的研究。在《周易》作者的問題上,錢澄之基本上認(rèn)同《漢書·藝文志》中所提的伏羲畫卦、文王作卦爻辭、孔子作《易傳》的觀點(diǎn),在此基礎(chǔ)上他還認(rèn)為周公也是爻辭的作者。在《周易》版本的問題上,朱子認(rèn)為《周易》的傳文附在經(jīng)文之后,使學(xué)者忽視了《周易》的全貌,違背了《周易》原有的宗旨。錢澄之繼承了朱子的觀點(diǎn),力圖恢復(fù)周易古經(jīng)在漢代的樣貌。錢澄之還認(rèn)為《周易》即變易之說(shuō),《周易》是本變化之書。 第四章主要是對(duì)錢澄之象數(shù)易學(xué)的研究。易圖以及河圖洛書在錢澄之象數(shù)易學(xué)中占據(jù)重要地位,錢澄之對(duì)易圖及河圖洛書的論述實(shí)質(zhì)是探求卦是如何生成的。錢澄之認(rèn)為卦是由伏羲所作,并非根據(jù)易圖及河圖洛書所作。錢澄之在占筮視野下對(duì)卦變、變占、卦象等問題進(jìn)行了探討。 第五章主要是對(duì)錢澄之義理之學(xué)進(jìn)行研究。首先錢澄之認(rèn)為太極、陰陽(yáng)二氣為宇宙生成本源,而人性也是稟賦陰陽(yáng)二氣所形成的。其次錢澄之對(duì)變化與變通進(jìn)行了分析。 第六章重點(diǎn)論述了錢澄之的以史證易的解易方式。首先對(duì)以史證易概念進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要分析。其次以隨卦為例,論述錢澄之以史證易的方法。 第七章主要是論述了錢澄之易學(xué)思想及評(píng)價(jià)。錢澄之在安徽桐城易學(xué)學(xué)派中占據(jù)一席之地,對(duì)后世易學(xué)產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)影響。
[Abstract]:Qian Chengzhi's late Ming Dynasty and early Qing Dynasty is a famous scientist and poetry. Easy to learn from Qian Chengzhi's xiangshuyixue starts later on Zhu Xi to view the inheritance and development. The director of scientist Qian Chengzhi's easy thought, his to have a "Han and Song Dynasties" characteristics, the idea of Yi Bo comparison miscellaneous. Qian Chengzhi's families to learn to learn not only gathers long, but also carry forward the history of the Song Dynasty to permit easy solution characteristics, there is a practical academic purpose. This thesis is a monographic study on Qian Chengzhi's Yi ology, mainly discussed from the following aspects.
The introduction briefly introduces the value of Qian Chengzhi's Yi studies, and the academic reviews of the Yi Qian Chengzhi's research results, pointed out the lack of research to learn the Qian Chengzhi's existing problems and shortcomings, put forward ideas and methods of writing this paper.
The first chapter is to Qian Chengzhi's life biographical sketch and writings introduced. Qian Chengzhi's life in Ming and Qing Dynasty, family education youth good academic research for money still lay a good foundation. The middle party suffered disaster, Yu Fujian fled to Guangzhou and other places. The fire spread, > was written in the escape process. In his later years after returning home, delete the old, new additions, began writing < field to learn.
The second chapter is mainly on the study of Qian Chengzhi's origin and the easy to learn history. Firstly, rheological on Zhouyi are briefly described. Secondly, from the family is easy to learn, a disciple of Huang Daozhou, asked to analyze Yi Qian Chengzhi's origin three aspects to friends. Inscribed on Qian Chengzhi's writing process and to learn the process and field > < < the field to learn > were introduced.
The third chapter is the research on the Yi Qian Chengzhi's basic point of view. In the book < > authors on the issue, Qian Chengzhi basically agree "Han Yiwenzhi > mentioned in the Fu Xi painting Gua, Wenwang as guayaoci, Confucius < > Yi on the basis of this view, he also believes that the Duke is yaoci the author in the book < > version of the problem, Zhu Xi believes that the book < > transfer paper attached to the Scriptures, the scholars ignore the" Zhouyi > picture, contrary to the original purpose of the book < >. Qian Chengzhi's inherited Zhu Xi's point of view, trying to restore the Han Dynasty in the ancient book of Qian Chengzhi's appearance. That book < > > < book of change, is the book of changes.
The fourth chapter is mainly on the study of Qian Chengzhi's numberology. As easy to map and Hetu in Qian Chengzhi's occupy an important position as the number of easy to learn, easy to discuss Qian Chengzhi's essence and the Hetu is seeking hexagrams is generated. Qian Chengzhi believes the hexagram is made by Fu Xi, not according to the drawings and Hetu. Made in divination Qian Chengzhi's perspective on guabian, accounting for variable are discussed, images and other issues.
The fifth chapter is mainly about Qian Chengzhi's argumentation research. Firstly, Qian Chengzhi believes that Tai Chi, yin and yang two as the universe origin, and human nature is the endowment of yin and Yang of the two gas formed. Secondly Qian Chengzhi's analysis of changes and modifications.
The sixth chapter focuses on the history of Qian Chengzhi's easy solution way. First make a brief analysis of the history to easy. Then with the hexagram as an example, discusses the method of history to Qian Chengzhi's easy.
The seventh chapter mainly discusses Qian Chengzhi's thought and evaluation to occupy a space for one person in Anhui. Qian Chengzhi's Tongcheng Yi school, has a far-reaching influence on later generations to learn.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B221

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 林忠軍;;論顧炎武易學(xué)思想與清代易學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向[J];東岳論叢;2012年06期

2 林忠軍;;毛奇齡“推移”說(shuō)與清代漢易復(fù)興[J];陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

3 張永義;;以莊繼易:錢澄之的莊學(xué)觀[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期

4 汪學(xué)群;錢澄之的經(jīng)世易學(xué)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

5 黃忠天;;史事宗易學(xué)研究方法析論[J];周易研究;2007年05期

6 黃忠天;;葉矯然《易史參錄》述要[J];周易研究;2008年05期

7 李波;;明代桐城方氏學(xué)派易學(xué)研究[J];周易研究;2011年05期

8 蔣國(guó)保;;錢澄之易學(xué)思想散論[J];周易研究;2013年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉建萍;蔡清及其易學(xué)思想研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2010年

2 崔麗麗;毛奇齡易學(xué)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

3 楊年豐;錢澄之文學(xué)研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1367259