本文關(guān)鍵詞：儒道互補與建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義比較研究　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 儒道互補 建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義 比較研究

【摘要】：儒道互補作為中國傳統(tǒng)文化的主要特征,是中國人的精神體現(xiàn)和古代的思想現(xiàn)象。認識到儒家和道家思想上的互補性和相通性是必要的。同時,作為當(dāng)今世界上主要思潮之一的建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義,在一定程度上與儒家思想和道家思想具有相似性,很多學(xué)者也為此進行了很多研究,但對中國傳統(tǒng)文化的重要特征儒道互補與建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義之間的研究甚少,因而,本文的重點在于將儒道互補作為整個研究,通過和建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義的比較分析,得出兩者之間具有的相似性或者相通性。本文的研究目的在于借助建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義消除西方對中國文化特別是儒道互補的誤解,為傳播中國傳統(tǒng)文化提供一條新的路徑。儒道互補與建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義一樣,都誕生于社會危機和思想危機之中,他們在前人思想的基礎(chǔ)上,批判繼承從而建立起自己的學(xué)說,為解決社會危機和思想危機提供新的途徑�？梢哉f,兩者是人類思維發(fā)展的必然結(jié)果。儒道互補和建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義在哲學(xué)本體論上也具有相似性和共通性。儒道思想都繼承了“道”的思想,全面深化了“道”作為宇宙本原的內(nèi)涵意義。而“道”的生成變化是與建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義中的懷特海過程關(guān)系哲學(xué)中的“過程”概念具有相似性,從而使兩者在哲學(xué)上共通。儒道互補思想與建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義在社會政治方面也有相融之處。儒道互補思想將人視為關(guān)系中的人,通過統(tǒng)治者的視角闡釋如何通過“無為”實現(xiàn)對治理百姓以及調(diào)節(jié)人與人之間的關(guān)系;同樣,在建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義理論中,基于廣義經(jīng)驗論提出的共情主義,以及由此產(chǎn)生的道義民主思想都可以和儒道互補的社會政治思想相互融合,其交融之處在于對于人的本質(zhì)認識是相同的,即人是關(guān)系中的人,情是關(guān)系建立的基礎(chǔ)�？傊畠烧咧g關(guān)系密切,相互融通。因而,儒道互補可以借助建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義向世界傳播中國傳統(tǒng)文化思想,可以借鑒其有益的思想內(nèi)涵發(fā)展自己的哲學(xué)理論和社會政治思想,實現(xiàn)時代性發(fā)展。這也是本文的創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:Confucianism and Taoism as the main feature China of traditional culture, is Chinese embodies the spirit and thoughts of ancient phenomenon. Aware of Confucianism and Taoism on the complementarities and similarities is necessary. At the same time, as the construction of one of the world's main trend of postmodernism, to a certain extent with Confucianism and Taoism have similar ideas, many scholars have conducted a lot of research, but the research between the important characteristics and construction of Chinese Confucianism and Taoism traditional culture of postmodernism is very little, therefore, the focus of this paper will complement the Confucianism as a whole to study, through comparative analysis and constructive postmodernism, or is that is the similarity between the two. The purpose of this study is to use constructive postmodernism to eliminate western especially the misunderstanding of Chinese complementation of Confucianism and Taoism culture, for the dissemination of China Provide a new path for traditional culture. Confucianism and Taoism and constructive postmodernism, born in the social crisis and ideological crisis, they are based on previous ideas, criticism and inheritance so as to establish their own theory, provide a new way to solve the social crisis and ideological crisis. It can be said that the two are the inevitable result of the development of human thinking. The complementation and constructive postmodernism in philosophy ontology is similar and common. Confucianism and Taoism have inherited the thought of "Tao", deepen the "Tao" as the origin of the universe and the connotation of meaning. "Generation change" is similar with the relationship between Whitehead and the process of constructive postmodernism in philosophy of "process" concept, so that the two common in philosophy. Confucianism and Taoism thought and constructive postmodernism in social politics is also. Place. Complementation of Confucianism and Taoism will be regarded as the relationship between the people, through the interpretation of the ruler's perspective on how to through the "Wuwei" to realize the relationship between governance and regulation of people and people; similarly, in the construction of post-modern theory, generalized empirical theory based on the principle of empathy, and the resulting moral thought of democracy can and complementation of Confucianism and Taoism's social and political thoughts of mutual integration, the integration of human nature lies in the understanding is the same, which is in the relationship between people, love is the basis of relationship building. In the close relationship between the two, mutual financing. Therefore, complementation of Confucianism and Taoism can make use of constructive postmodernism spread to the world Chinese the idea of traditional culture, can draw lessons from the connotation of development of their own philosophy and social and political thought, the realization of the times development. This is the innovation of this paper.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：B089.1;B22

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 馮石崗;王洋;;道家“和合”思想和建設(shè)性后現(xiàn)代主義的古今呼應(yīng)[J];四川工程職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

2 樊美筠;王治河;;第二次啟蒙與文明對話的新使命[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年06期

，

本文編號：1359075