乳腺X線攝影和超聲檢查診斷乳腺癌的對(duì)比研究
本文選題:乳腺癌 + 鉬靶; 參考:《昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:[目的]擬探討鉬靶X線攝影和超聲應(yīng)用于乳腺癌診斷的意義與差別,以提高乳腺癌的臨床檢出率,為優(yōu)化影像學(xué)檢查策略提供可靠依據(jù)。[方法]回顧性分析2015年12月至2016年12月在昆明市第一人民醫(yī)院乳腺中心就診病例中,經(jīng)術(shù)前影像學(xué)檢查,術(shù)后病理報(bào)告證實(shí)的355名乳腺癌患者。對(duì)該355份病歷進(jìn)行回顧性分析,355名患者均行超聲及鉬靶檢查,隨機(jī)分為三組,單獨(dú)統(tǒng)計(jì)超聲結(jié)果的有125例病人,單獨(dú)統(tǒng)計(jì)鉬靶結(jié)果的有103例病人,統(tǒng)計(jì)組合檢測(cè)結(jié)果的有127例患者。以病理結(jié)果為金標(biāo)準(zhǔn),采用卡方檢驗(yàn)分析比較鉬靶、超聲、鉬靶聯(lián)合超聲三種檢查方法對(duì)于診斷乳腺癌的檢出率、漏診率的差異;根據(jù)患者年齡、腺體類型、影像學(xué)表現(xiàn)等著重分析超聲與鉬靶X線攝影對(duì)于乳腺癌診斷的價(jià)值對(duì)比。[結(jié)果]1.兩種檢查組合和單一超聲和單一鉬靶X線檢查相比,檢出率和漏診率有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差別。鉬靶X線檢查和超聲就檢出率和漏診率對(duì)比無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。2.超聲對(duì)于腫塊、異常血流和腋窩淋巴結(jié)檢出率高于乳房X線檢查,而乳房X線對(duì)微鈣化檢出率高,對(duì)于腫塊形狀是否規(guī)則,邊界是否清晰兩者無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。3.鉬靶X線在脂肪型及少量腺體型乳房中對(duì)乳腺癌的檢出率高于超聲,而超聲對(duì)于多量腺體型及致密型乳房乳腺癌檢查率明顯高于鉬靶X線,差別具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。4.根據(jù)年齡分組,超聲與鉬靶在26-39歲年齡組與50-59、60-69歲年齡組間差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。[結(jié)論]鉬靶X線檢查和超聲分別有各自優(yōu)勢(shì)。組合應(yīng)用可以使兩個(gè)檢查優(yōu)勢(shì)互補(bǔ),顯著提高了檢出率,降低乳腺癌漏診率。最終,最佳乳腺癌癥檢查策略需要個(gè)性化的方法,根據(jù)患者個(gè)體異質(zhì)性如年齡,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和乳房密度等指標(biāo)選擇性應(yīng)用檢查技術(shù)。
[Abstract]:[objective] to explore the significance and difference of mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast cancer, in order to improve the clinical detection rate of breast cancer and to provide reliable basis for optimizing the imaging examination strategy. [methods] from December 2015 to December 2016, 355 patients with breast cancer confirmed by preoperative imaging examination and pathological report were retrospectively analyzed in the breast center of the first people's Hospital of Kunming City. A retrospective analysis of 355 cases was carried out. All 355 patients were examined by ultrasound and molybdenum target. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: 125 patients with single ultrasound results and 103 patients with molybdenum target results. There were 127 patients with combined results. The diagnostic rate and missed rate of breast cancer were compared by chi-square test and chi-square test according to the age of the patients, the type of glands, and the difference of the detection rate and the missed rate of breast cancer by three methods: mammography, ultrasound and mammography. Imaging findings were focused on the value of ultrasound and mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. [result] 1. Compared with single ultrasound and single molybdenum target X-ray examination, the detection rate and missed diagnosis rate were significantly different between the two examination combinations. There was no significant difference in detection rate and missed diagnosis rate between mammography and ultrasound. The detection rate of abnormal blood flow and axillary lymph nodes in ultrasound was higher than that in mammography, but the detection rate of microcalcification in mammography was higher than that in mammography. The detection rate of mammography for breast cancer in fat type and a few glandular type was higher than that in ultrasound, but the detection rate of ultrasound for breast cancer of multiple glandular type and dense type was significantly higher than that of mammography, the difference was statistically significant. According to the age group, the difference between ultrasound and molybdenum target was statistically significant between the age group of 26-39 years and the age group of 50-990-69 years old. [conclusion] Molybdenum target X-ray examination and ultrasound have their respective advantages. The combined application can make the two examinations complement each other, improve the detection rate and reduce the missed diagnosis rate of breast cancer. Finally, the best breast cancer screening strategy requires a personalized approach, which is selectively applied according to the patient's individual heterogeneity such as age, risk and breast density.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:R737.9
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張保寧;陳萬青;張希;喬友林;;中國乳腺癌防控形勢(shì)面臨挑戰(zhàn)[J];中華腫瘤雜志;2016年10期
2 左婷婷;陳萬青;;中國乳腺癌全人群生存率分析研究進(jìn)展[J];中國腫瘤臨床;2016年14期
3 王文;孫毅紅;金鶴;;乳腺癌中超聲的應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀及進(jìn)展研究[J];中外醫(yī)療;2016年07期
4 鄭明君;;乳腺癌的彩色多普勒血流分布特征與組織病理學(xué)對(duì)照研究[J];中國實(shí)用醫(yī)刊;2015年14期
5 陳萬青;鄭榮壽;;中國女性乳腺癌發(fā)病死亡和生存狀況[J];中國腫瘤臨床;2015年13期
6 聶德紅;李洪義;李凱;黃小飛;;乳腺癌的影像學(xué)檢查現(xiàn)狀與新進(jìn)展[J];中國當(dāng)代醫(yī)藥;2015年15期
7 師頤康;;遠(yuǎn)離乳腺癌誤報(bào)的新方法[J];科學(xué)養(yǎng)生;2015年03期
8 賀志華;王懷英;周小紅;;鉬靶、超聲與病理對(duì)早期乳腺癌的臨床分析[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)用影像學(xué);2015年01期
9 文嬋娟;廖昕;徐維敏;張玲;歐陽晨雨;秦耿耿;陳衛(wèi)國;;乳腺癌線樣或線樣分支狀鈣化與病理類型和分子表達(dá)的關(guān)系[J];放射學(xué)實(shí)踐;2014年08期
10 徐艷紅;;數(shù)字化鉬靶X線攝影在乳腺腫瘤臨床診斷中的應(yīng)用[J];中國醫(yī)學(xué)教育技術(shù);2014年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 孫亞冬;類載脂蛋白C-I在乳腺癌血清中的鑒定及生物學(xué)特性研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2016年
2 洪慶山;X線、CT和乳腺磁共振在乳腺癌診斷和保乳術(shù)前評(píng)估的序貫應(yīng)用研究[D];南方醫(yī)科大學(xué);2014年
3 江立玉;乳腺癌鉬靶X線表現(xiàn)與其臨床病理特征相關(guān)性的研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李洪德;乳腺實(shí)質(zhì)X線分型法與BI-RADS分類法在農(nóng)村女性乳腺癌篩查中的相關(guān)性研究[D];青島大學(xué);2015年
2 鄭曉潔;圖像后處理軟件在全數(shù)字化乳腺攝影中對(duì)乳腺癌的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2018788
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/2018788.html