發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-29 19:51

  本文選題：腹腔鏡 + 腎上腺�。� 參考：《安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的比較3D腹腔鏡與傳統(tǒng)(2D)腹腔鏡技術(shù)在腎上腺腫瘤手術(shù)的療效。對術(shù)中指標(biāo)和術(shù)后指標(biāo)進(jìn)行對比,針對兩種手術(shù)模式就其不同之處進(jìn)行探究。探討3D腹腔鏡在腎上腺腫瘤手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。方法2012年12月至2013年8月應(yīng)用腹腔鏡手術(shù)治療腎上腺腫瘤55例。對行3D腹腔鏡腎上腺手術(shù)患者30例(3D組)與同期行傳統(tǒng)2D腹腔鏡腎上腺手術(shù)患者25例(2D組)的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、輸血情況、術(shù)后引流量、術(shù)后住院天數(shù)、術(shù)后病理分布、住院費(fèi)用進(jìn)行比較。結(jié)果55例手術(shù)全部成功,手術(shù)時(shí)間55~125 min,其中3D腹腔鏡組60±19min(55~125 min),2D腹腔鏡組68±24min(60~120 min),發(fā)現(xiàn)這兩組數(shù)據(jù)之間的差別有著明顯的統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);術(shù)中出血量為10~150 ml,其中3D腹腔鏡組25±14 ml(15~100 m1),2D腹腔鏡組34±17 ml(20~90 m1),兩組差別具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),所有手術(shù)病人均無輸血。55例患者術(shù)后住院3~9天,其中3D腹腔鏡組3~6天,2D腹腔鏡組3~7天,差別無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。兩組患者均未出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重并發(fā)癥。所承擔(dān)的住院費(fèi)用大約為19654±807.3元,另外2D腹腔鏡組19593±823元,3D腹腔鏡組19789±786元,兩組差別不具備統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。結(jié)論3D腹腔鏡技術(shù)較傳統(tǒng)2D腹腔鏡技術(shù)在空間定位及深度感覺上有明顯優(yōu)勢,一定程度上降低手術(shù)難度,縮短手術(shù)時(shí)間,同時(shí)不增加患者的經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān),是一項(xiàng)值得推廣的新技術(shù)。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the effect of 3 D laparoscopy and 2 D laparoscopy in adrenal tumor surgery. Compare the intraoperative and postoperative indexes and explore the differences between the two modes. To evaluate the value of 3 D laparoscopy in adrenal tumor surgery. Methods from December 2012 to August 2013, 55 cases of adrenal tumors were treated with laparoscopic surgery. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative pathological distribution and postoperative pathological distribution of 30 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic adrenal surgery and 25 patients undergoing traditional laparoscopic adrenal surgery were compared. The cost of hospitalization was compared. Results all the operations were successful. The operation time was 55 ~ 125 minutes, of which the 3D laparoscopic group was 60 鹵19min(55~125 / min and the 2D laparoscopic group was 68 鹵24min(60~120 / min. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05), and the intraoperative bleeding was 10150ml, including 25 鹵14 ml(15~100 / ml 2D laparoscopy group (34 鹵17 ml(20~90 ml), and the two groups were divided into two groups: the 3D laparoscopic group (25 鹵14 ml(15~100 / ml) and the 2D laparoscopic group (34 鹵17 ml(20~90 / ml). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). No blood transfusion was found in all the patients. 55 patients were hospitalized for 3 to 9 days after operation. There was no significant difference between 3D laparoscopic group and 2D laparoscope group (P 0.05). There were no serious complications in both groups. The cost of hospitalization was about 19654 鹵807.3 yuan and that of 2D laparoscopy group was 19593 鹵823 yuan and that of 3D laparoscopy group was 19789 鹵786.There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion 3D laparoscopy has obvious advantages over traditional 2D laparoscopy in space location and depth feeling. It can reduce the difficulty of operation and shorten the operation time to some extent, and at the same time, it does not increase the economic burden of patients. It is a new technology worth popularizing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：R736.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 徐衛(wèi)強(qiáng);關(guān)超;方文革;谷明利;趙維多;許海斌;郭園園;謝海龍;;后腹腔鏡手術(shù)治療小兒泌尿外科疾病的臨床療效分析[J];安徽醫(yī)學(xué);2012年01期

2 丘少鵬;陳羽;陳煒;陳凌武;陳俊星;;腹腔鏡與開放手術(shù)治療腎上腺嗜鉻細(xì)胞瘤安全性的比較[J];腹腔鏡外科雜志;2006年01期

3 梁朝朝;周駿;張賢生;郝宗耀;葉元平;劉明;蔣云仙;王克孝;;腹腔鏡下腎上腺腫瘤切除手術(shù)方式的探討[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;2007年08期

4 喬鵬;張軍暉;閆勇;王建文;田溪泉;邢念增;;后腹腔鏡手術(shù)治療腎上腺嗜鉻細(xì)胞瘤(附8例報(bào)告)[J];中國內(nèi)鏡雜志;2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1821317