伴有鈣化的乳腺浸潤性導(dǎo)管癌的病理特征及預(yù)后分析
本文選題:乳腺腫瘤 + 鈣化��; 參考:《新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:目的:探討乳腺浸潤性導(dǎo)管癌中鈣化的臨床病理特征及預(yù)后的影響因素。方法:回顧性收集2012年6月-2013年6月在新疆腫瘤醫(yī)院乳腺外科收治的初治可行乳腺癌改良根治術(shù)/保乳根治術(shù)/單純切除術(shù)的307例女性乳腺癌患者的臨床病理資料及隨訪資料,根據(jù)乳腺X線圖像特征分為鈣化組與非鈣化組,采用χ2檢驗(yàn)分析其臨床病理特征之間的差異,逐步Logistic回歸分析影響鈣化存在的相關(guān)因素,運(yùn)用Kaplan-Meier生存分析方法分析鈣化的表達(dá)與患者生存之間的關(guān)系。結(jié)果:(1)鈣化組在病理類型,淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移,人表皮生長因子受體2(Her-2)過表達(dá),組織學(xué)分級,臨床分期、分子分型、Ki67與非鈣化組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=21.551、8.480、10.558、6.283、9.682、16.380、3.947,P=0.000、0.037、0.005、0.043、0.021、0.001、0.047)。(2)鈣化是淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移及Her-2過表達(dá)的相關(guān)風(fēng)險因素。鈣化組淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的風(fēng)險是非鈣化組的1.736倍;鈣化組Her-2過表達(dá)的風(fēng)險是非鈣化組的2.297倍(P=0.022、0.007,OR=1.736、2.297,95%CI:1.084-2.779、1.260-4.187)。(3)鈣化組和非鈣化組3年無病生存率分別是84.42%和96.15%。對乳腺浸潤性導(dǎo)管癌的預(yù)后行COX多因素分析提示鈣化和淋巴結(jié)狀態(tài)(淋巴結(jié)陽性4-9個和9個)是影響乳腺浸潤性導(dǎo)管癌無病生存時間的獨(dú)立預(yù)后危險因素(P=0.008、0.000(0.021、0.000),95%Cl:1.380-8.510、1.231-12.144和2.570-20.492)。結(jié)論:鈣化是乳腺浸潤性導(dǎo)管癌預(yù)后較差的影響因子。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of calcification in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Methods: the clinicopathological data and follow-up data of 307 female breast cancer patients who were treated in breast surgery department of Xinjiang tumor Hospital from June 2012 to June 2013 were retrospectively collected. According to the characteristics of mammogram, the patients were divided into calcified group and non-calcified group. 蠂 2 test was used to analyze the difference between the clinicopathological features and stepwise Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related factors affecting the existence of calcification. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the relationship between calcification expression and patient survival. Results in the calcification group, pathological type, lymph node metastasis, expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF receptor 2) Her-2), histological grade, and clinical stage were observed. There was significant difference between the molecular typing group and non-calcified group (蠂 ~ 2 + 21.551 ~ 8.480 ~ 10.558 ~ 6.283C ~ (9.682) ~ (16.380) ~ 3.947) calcification was a risk factor of lymph node metastasis and overexpression of Her-2. It was a risk factor of lymph node metastasis and overexpression of Her-2 by 0.037 ~ 0.005 ~ 0. 043 ~ 0. 021 ~ 0. 041 ~ 0. 047. 2) there was a significant difference between the two groups (蠂 ~ (2) ~ (21) 551) and non-calcification (蠂 ~ (2). The risk of lymph node metastasis in the calcified group was 1.736 times higher than that in the non-calcified group, and the risk of Her-2 overexpression in the calcified group was 2.297 times higher than that in the non-calcified group. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 84.42% in the calcified group and 96.15.1% in the non-calcified group. COX multivariate analysis showed that calcification and lymph node status (positive lymph nodes 4-9 and 9 lymph nodes) were independent prognostic risk factors for the survival time of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast without disease. Conclusion: calcification is a poor prognostic factor in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R737.9
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 董文文;吳濤;楊亮;趙倩;迪力夏提·金斯汗;羅蕈;朱麗萍;;乳腺癌鈣化的相關(guān)危險因素分析[J];中國普通外科雜志;2015年11期
2 吳迪;范志民;;乳腺癌微鈣化灶的研究新進(jìn)展[J];中國腫瘤臨床;2015年18期
3 梁曉燕;黃穎;許建林;康曉麗;黃范利;;乳腺導(dǎo)管原位癌與浸潤性導(dǎo)管癌X線征象對比分析[J];實(shí)用放射學(xué)雜志;2015年08期
4 曾輝;秦耿耿;陳衛(wèi)國;;鈣相關(guān)蛋白在乳腺癌微鈣化形成機(jī)制中作用的研究進(jìn)展[J];實(shí)用放射學(xué)雜志;2015年03期
5 陳建彬;王蓓;高秀飛;;激素受體陽性乳腺癌預(yù)后影響因素分析[J];浙江醫(yī)學(xué);2015年05期
6 李彬;湯素瓊;黃華明;張景宇;伊藤理江子;山田麻希;;乳腺癌鈣化在數(shù)字化全景乳腺攝影中的特征性分析[J];中國醫(yī)療設(shè)備;2015年02期
7 于連水;付連英;;相位對比鉬靶X線成像診斷乳腺癌價值[J];中華實(shí)用診斷與治療雜志;2014年10期
8 文嬋娟;廖昕;徐維敏;張玲;歐陽晨雨;秦耿耿;陳衛(wèi)國;;乳腺癌線樣或線樣分支狀鈣化與病理類型和分子表達(dá)的關(guān)系[J];放射學(xué)實(shí)踐;2014年08期
9 陳衛(wèi)國;秦耿耿;徐維敏;廖昕;文嬋娟;張玲;歐陽晨雨;;非腫塊型鈣化性乳腺癌微鈣化X線表現(xiàn)與病理結(jié)果對照[J];南方醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年04期
10 左描繪;胡婷秀;楊土保;;乳腺癌影響因素研究進(jìn)展[J];實(shí)用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2013年09期
,本文編號:1802281
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/1802281.html