本文選題：年齡與發(fā)育進(jìn)程問卷 + 差異比較��； 參考：《中國循證兒科雜志》2017年02期

【摘要】：目的研究中國與美國1~66個(gè)月兒童的《年齡與發(fā)育進(jìn)程問卷-第3版》(ASQ-3)常模數(shù)據(jù),分析兩國兒童發(fā)育的差異并探討其產(chǎn)生的原因。方法資料來源于中、美ASQ-3常模數(shù)據(jù)。采用SAS 9.3和MS Excel進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,比較兩國兒童每個(gè)ASQ-3月齡組各能區(qū)得分的平均值。結(jié)果中國常�？倶颖緸�4 452人,每個(gè)月齡組為218~227例;美國常�？倶颖緸�18 572例,每個(gè)月齡組為352~2 088例。中、美ASQ-3常模比較,溝通能區(qū)共有11個(gè)月齡組差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,≤10 m月齡組均為美國高于中國,~20 m月齡組互有高低,~54 m月齡組中國高于美國;粗大動(dòng)作能區(qū)有15個(gè)月齡組差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,在≤20 m月齡組均為美國高于中國,~30 m月齡組互有高低,≥33 m月齡組及以后均為中國高于美國;精細(xì)動(dòng)作能區(qū)有14個(gè)月齡組差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,≤24 m月齡組為美國高于中國,之后互有高低,但仍以美國較高為主;解決問題能區(qū)有15個(gè)月齡組差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,均為美國高于中國;個(gè)人-社會(huì)能區(qū)有17個(gè)月齡組差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,≤14 m月齡組美國高于中國,~36 m月齡組互有高低,其中5個(gè)差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義的月齡組都是美國高于中國,≥42 m月齡組均為中國高于美國。結(jié)論中國0~2歲兒童的綜合發(fā)育水平較美國兒童低,之后有逐漸趕上或超過的趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the age and development process questionnaire - Third Edition (ASQ-3) norm of 1~66 month children in China and the United States, to analyze the differences in development of children in two countries and to explore the causes. Methods data were derived from the US ASQ-3 norm data. SAS 9.3 and MS Excel were used for statistical analysis to compare the energy of each ASQ-3 month group of children between the two countries. Results the average value of district score was 4452 in China, 4452 in each month group, 18572 in the United States and 088 in each month group of 352~2. In the United States ASQ-3 norm, the difference between the 11 month old group and the 10 m month group was higher than China, and the ~20 m month group had each other. High and low, the ~54 m month old group is higher than the United States, the difference between the 15 month old group and the 20 m month group is higher than the China, the ~30 m month group is high and low, the 33 m month old group and the later are higher than the United States, and the difference of the fine action energy area is 14 months old. The group is less than 24 m months old. The United States was higher than China, but it was higher in the United States than in the United States. The difference between the 15 month old group was statistically significant, all of which were higher in the United States than in China. The difference between the 17 month old group of individual and social energy area was statistically significant, the United States of the 14 m month old group was higher than China, and the ~36 m month group had high and low levels, of which 5 differences were unified. All the monthly age groups were higher in the United States than in China, and the group of 42 m months old was higher than that of the United States. Conclusion the overall development level of 0~2 years old children in China is lower than that of American children.

【作者單位】： 上海美華婦兒醫(yī)院兒科;美國加州州立大學(xué)北嶺分校教育學(xué)院特殊教育系;美國俄勒岡大學(xué)特殊教育和臨床科學(xué)部、早期干預(yù)研究所;昆山市婦幼保健所兒童保健科;美國肯特州立大學(xué)特殊教育部;云南省婦幼保健院保健技術(shù)指導(dǎo)科;上海市婦幼保健中心兒童保健科;
【分類號(hào)】：R179

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡存田;五月，兒童發(fā)育高峰[J];醫(yī)藥與保健;1995年03期

2 李公正;視覺運(yùn)動(dòng)統(tǒng)合與兒童發(fā)育評(píng)估[J];中國醫(yī)刊;2000年10期

3 ;早期兒童發(fā)育科學(xué)國際研討會(huì)[J];中華小兒外科雜志;2002年06期

4 何志謙;蛋白質(zhì):兒童發(fā)育的基石[J];醫(yī)療保健器具;2005年05期

5 王建瓊,倪宗瓚;300例兒童發(fā)育的影響因素分析(摘要)[J];中華預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1997年04期

6 陳豐;兒童健康十忌[J];城市技術(shù)監(jiān)督;1999年05期

7 毛禮鐘 ,孟莉瑛;浙江省七所幼兒園兒童發(fā)育和營養(yǎng)的狀況(上)[J];中國食品;1991年07期

8 蘭政文;促兒童發(fā)育有招數(shù)[J];中國保健營養(yǎng);2000年05期

9 金星明;0～3歲兒童發(fā)育和行為的預(yù)見性指導(dǎo)[J];中國實(shí)用兒科雜志;2004年10期

10 金星明;用生態(tài)學(xué)觀念看待媒介對(duì)兒童發(fā)育的影響[J];中國兒童保健雜志;2005年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 記者 李新軍　通訊員 張汝超;呼倫貝爾市三少民族兒童發(fā)育整體較好[N];內(nèi)蒙古日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2010年

2 記者　 卞晨光;世衛(wèi)組織出臺(tái)兒童發(fā)育新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

3 編譯 楊孝文;過量補(bǔ)鈣對(duì)兒童發(fā)育毫無益處[N];北京科技報(bào);2005年

4 衣曉峰邋王金菊;哈爾濱兒童發(fā)育呈良好態(tài)勢(shì)[N];健康報(bào);2007年

5 張莉英;VA缺乏影響兒童發(fā)育[N];保健時(shí)報(bào);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1886728