兩種空氣微生物采樣器采樣效果比較
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-10 18:20
本文選題:空氣微生物采樣器 + 微生物 ; 參考:《中國(guó)消毒學(xué)雜志》2017年07期
【摘要】:目的探討二級(jí)篩孔撞擊式空氣微生物采樣器與六級(jí)篩孔撞擊式空氣微生物采樣器對(duì)空氣中細(xì)菌總數(shù)的測(cè)定結(jié)果的差異性。方法在相同的地點(diǎn)和時(shí)間,分別使用二級(jí)和六級(jí)篩孔式空氣微生物采樣器對(duì)選定實(shí)驗(yàn)室、醫(yī)院門(mén)診大廳和潔凈手術(shù)室的空氣進(jìn)行采樣,采樣流量為28.3 L/min,采集時(shí)間為15 min,在37℃生化培養(yǎng)箱分別培養(yǎng)24 h、48 h和72 h后觀察結(jié)果,并對(duì)結(jié)果進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。結(jié)果二級(jí)與六級(jí)篩孔式空氣微生物采樣器在相同環(huán)境相同采集時(shí)間并在相同培養(yǎng)條件下的集菌量均無(wú)顯著性差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論應(yīng)根據(jù)不同監(jiān)測(cè)目的選擇適合的采樣器,二級(jí)篩孔式空氣微生物采樣器適用于測(cè)定空氣中細(xì)菌總數(shù)采樣,六級(jí)篩孔式空氣微生物采樣器則更適用于空氣細(xì)菌粒徑大小及分布研究使用。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the difference of the determination results of bacteria in the air between the two stage sieve hole impinging air microorganism sampler and the six stage screen hole impinging air microbial sampler. Methods at the same time and at the same time, the air samples of selected laboratory, hospital outpatient hall and clean operating room were sampled by two and six stage sieve air microorganism sampler, respectively. The sampling flow rate was 28.3 L / min and the sampling time was 15 min. The results were observed after 24 h and 72 h culture in 37 鈩,
本文編號(hào):1870373
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/1870373.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著