本文選題：艾滋病防治工作　切入點(diǎn)：社會(huì)組織　出處：《中國(guó)艾滋病性病》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的分析并完善社會(huì)組織參與艾滋病防治工作的績(jī)效指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)體系。方法通過(guò)查閱文獻(xiàn)、現(xiàn)場(chǎng)訪談等方式收集社會(huì)組織參與艾滋病防治工作的績(jī)效指標(biāo),結(jié)合目前社會(huì)組織參與艾滋病防治工作的實(shí)際情況,形成社會(huì)組織參與艾滋病防治工作績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系初稿。隨后,通過(guò)兩次德?tīng)柗品?對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步篩選。結(jié)果初稿確定了32個(gè)工作績(jī)效指標(biāo)。參與德?tīng)柗品ㄕ{(diào)查專家共16名,其從事艾滋病防治工作平均年限17.22年,參與社會(huì)組織領(lǐng)域工作平均年限10.41年。兩輪調(diào)查的專家積極性系數(shù)均為100%(16/16);專家權(quán)威程度(Cr)介于0.71至0.94。第一輪的重要性、可獲得性及兩者綜合肯德?tīng)柡椭C系數(shù)(W)分別為0.25、0.19和0.20,刪除4個(gè)指標(biāo);第二輪分別為0.36、0.26和0.34,刪除5個(gè)指標(biāo)。最終確定25個(gè)指標(biāo),其中通用指標(biāo)12個(gè),高危人群干預(yù)領(lǐng)域5個(gè),感染者和病人關(guān)懷領(lǐng)域共8個(gè)。結(jié)論通過(guò)德?tīng)柗品ㄗ罱K確定的指標(biāo)在理論上能夠反映目前社會(huì)組織參與艾滋病防治工作的績(jī)效情況,但指標(biāo)在績(jī)效應(yīng)用中的可獲得性、真實(shí)性、實(shí)用性等情況,仍需在實(shí)踐中進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證與完善。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze and improve the evaluation system of social organizations' participation in AIDS prevention and control. According to the actual situation of social organizations participating in the prevention and treatment of AIDS, a preliminary draft of the performance indicator system of social organizations participating in the prevention and treatment of AIDS was formed. Subsequently, the Delphi method was adopted twice. The first draft of the results identified 32 job performance indicators. A total of 16 experts participated in the Delphi method, and the average working life of AIDS prevention and control was 17.22 years. The average number of years of participation in the field of social organization was 10.41 years. The positive coefficient of experts in both rounds was 100 to 16 / 16. The degree of authority of experts ranged from 0.71 to 0.94.The importance of the first round, The Kendall harmony coefficient (WW) of the two groups was 0.250.19 and 0.20, respectively, with the deletion of 4 indicators, the second round of 0.36, 0.26 and 0.34, respectively, and the deletion of 5 indicators. 25 indicators were determined, of which 12 were universal and 5 were in the intervention field of high-risk population. Conclusion the indicators determined by Delphi method can theoretically reflect the current performance of social organizations in AIDS prevention and treatment, but the indicators are available and true in the performance application. Practicability and so on, still need to be further verified and consummated in practice.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)疾病預(yù)防控制中心性病艾滋病預(yù)防控制中心;中國(guó)性病艾滋病防治協(xié)會(huì);中華預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì);
【基金】：中國(guó)科協(xié)咨商項(xiàng)目~~
【分類號(hào)】：R512.91;R183

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張霞;吳世達(dá);陳健;倪駿;周妍;金軼;;德?tīng)柗品ㄔ诘罔F運(yùn)行環(huán)境衛(wèi)生學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)篩選中的應(yīng)用[J];環(huán)境與職業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué);2011年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1569097