發(fā)布時間：2018-07-11 10:09

  本文選題：主視眼 + 非主視眼��； 參考：《天津醫(yī)科大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的： 研究主視眼與非主視眼的在文字閱讀和圖片搜索任務中的眼動過程的異同。 方法： 實驗A：20人分別應用主視眼、非主視眼和雙眼各閱讀難度相同的3段文字,并且回答相應問題；實驗B：20人分別應用主視眼、非主視眼和雙眼完成難度相同的3組圖片搜索任務,并且回答相應的問題。應用加拿大SR Research公司的SR Research EyeLink2000眼動儀記錄研究過程中的研究眼的各項眼動指標。 結果： 文字閱讀任務中問題回答正確率為94.7%,主視眼和非主視眼各項觀察指標均無顯著差異。圖片搜索過程中問題回答正確率為95%,主視眼與非主視眼之間平均注視時間無統(tǒng)計學差異(P=0.210)；主視眼與非主視眼之間總注視時間無統(tǒng)計學差異(P=0.534)；主視眼與非主視眼之間總注視次數(shù)無統(tǒng)計學差異(P=0.880)；雙眼注視瞳孔大小小于單眼搜索時的瞳孔大小,差異具有統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.001)。雙眼平均注視時間和主視眼平均注視時間無統(tǒng)計學差異(P=0.082),但小于非主視眼搜索時間,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.026)。雙眼總注視時間小于單眼總注視時間,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.01)。雙眼總注視次數(shù)小于單眼總注視次數(shù),差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。 結論： 近距離(91cm)工作中,無論是文字閱讀還是圖片搜索,主視眼與非主視眼的眼動過程均無明顯差異。而視覺搜索時雙眼視相對于單眼視有更高的工作效率。
[Abstract]:Aim: to study the similarities and differences of eye movement in text reading and image searching between primary and non-primary eyes. Methods: the subjects of experiment A: 20 were treated with 3 paragraphs with the same reading difficulty in primary eye, non-primary eye and both eyes, and the corresponding questions were answered, and the subjects of experiment B: 20 were treated with primary eye, respectively. Non-primary eyes and eyes completed the same difficulty of 3 groups of image search tasks and answered the corresponding questions. Using SR Research EyeLink2000 eye movement instrument of SR Research Company of Canada to record the eye movement indexes in the course of the study. Results: the correct rate of answering questions in the reading task was 94. 7%, and there was no significant difference between the main eye and non-primary eye. In the course of image search, the correct rate of answering questions was 95%. There was no statistical difference in the mean fixation time between the main eye and the non-main eye (P0. 210), but there was no statistical difference in the total fixation time between the main eye and the non main eye (P0. 534). There was no significant difference in the total fixation frequency between the primary eye and the non-primary eye (P0. 880), but the size of the binocular gaze pupil was smaller than that of the monocular search (P0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean fixation time between the two eyes (P0. 082), but the mean fixation time was less than that of non-primary eye search (P0. 026). The time of binocular total fixation was less than that of monocular fixation (P 0.01). The number of binocular total fixation was less than that of monocular total fixation, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: there is no significant difference in eye movement between primary eye and non-main eye in close distance (91cm) work, whether in text reading or image searching. In visual search, binocular vision is more efficient than monocular vision.
【學位授予單位】：天津醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：R779.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李勇,陰國恩,陳燕麗;閱讀中疲勞、心理負荷因素對瞳孔大小的調節(jié)作用[J];心理與行為研究;2004年03期

2 閆國利;白學軍;;漢語閱讀的眼動研究[J];心理與行為研究;2007年03期

3 劉玨;陳劍;周清;李水蓮;李詩娜;呂冠僖;;青少年屈光不正患者主視眼眼別相關因素分析[J];廣東醫(yī)學;2006年03期

4 JohnT.Flynn ,周毅丁;弱視再論[J];國外醫(yī)學.眼科學分冊;1992年06期

5 桂曼蕓;何書喜;;主導眼[J];醫(yī)學臨床研究;2007年02期

6 萬鴻,方子鄂;主導眼與矯正視力的關系探討[J];蘇州醫(yī)學院學報;1999年03期

7 毛世忠;赫章地區(qū)男青年主視眼調查[J];眼科新進展;1998年01期

8 閻國利;眼動分析法在廣告心理學研究中的應用[J];心理學動態(tài);1999年04期

9 閻國利,白學軍;中文閱讀過程的眼動研究[J];心理學動態(tài);2000年03期

10 吳迪,舒華;眼動技術在閱讀研究中的應用[J];心理學動態(tài);2001年04期

，

本文編號：2114769