【摘要】：背景:聽力障礙不僅影響聽力殘疾人的身心健康,同時(shí)也造成家庭和社會(huì)負(fù)擔(dān)加重等社會(huì)問(wèn)題。而佩戴助聽器能幫助他們改善聽力,提高言語(yǔ)交往能力,減少他們參與社會(huì)生活的障礙,從而改善他們的生活。本文針對(duì)助聽器佩戴前后聽力殘疾人生存質(zhì)量、照顧質(zhì)量和殘疾態(tài)度的變化來(lái)開展相應(yīng)的研究。目的:了解聽力殘疾人照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度和生存質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀,通過(guò)照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度與生存質(zhì)量這三方面評(píng)價(jià)助聽器佩戴對(duì)聽力殘疾人的影響,分析助聽器佩戴前后照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度和生存質(zhì)量的關(guān)聯(lián)性,以期為聽力殘疾人照顧的提供,殘疾態(tài)度的改善和生存質(zhì)量的提高提出有針對(duì)性的建議。方法:采用世界衛(wèi)生組織照顧質(zhì)量量表、殘疾態(tài)度量表和生存質(zhì)量量表調(diào)查杭州市4個(gè)區(qū)198名聽力殘疾人,通過(guò)單因素和多因素分析方法分析聽力殘疾人照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度和生存質(zhì)量的現(xiàn)狀并探索三者之間的相關(guān)性;通過(guò)回訪調(diào)查比較助聽器佩戴前后聽力殘疾人照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度和生存質(zhì)量的變化。結(jié)果:(1)杭州市聽力殘疾發(fā)生的原因主要包括藥物性、中耳炎、神經(jīng)性、鼓膜穿孔、突發(fā)性和遺傳性等;(2)66.2%的聽力殘疾人認(rèn)為自身的生存質(zhì)量一般,生存質(zhì)量的平均得分為64.17±9.30分,生理維度的得分最低,生存質(zhì)量與心理維度的相關(guān)性最大(r=0.895);(3)照顧質(zhì)量總分的平均分為54.07±8.68分,殘疾態(tài)度總分的平均分為50.46±7.48分;(4)照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度與生存質(zhì)量呈正相關(guān)(r=0.491,r=0.439),通徑分析結(jié)果顯示聽力殘疾人生存質(zhì)量的主要影響因素為照顧環(huán)境、包容、照顧可及性和照顧給予;(5)共回訪195名聽力殘疾人,回訪率為98.5%,在過(guò)去1年中有44名未佩戴助聽器,151名佩戴助聽器,其中偶爾佩戴的有59人,經(jīng)常佩戴的有92人;(6)聽力殘疾人佩戴助聽器后生存質(zhì)量有所改善(t=2.041,P=0.043),主要是生理和心理維度得分較佩戴前高,殘疾態(tài)度也有改善(t=5.237,P0.001)且各維度得分較佩戴前高,聽力殘疾人照顧質(zhì)量得分在助聽器佩戴前后沒(méi)有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(t=1.832,P=0.072);經(jīng)常佩戴助聽器的人其生存質(zhì)量和殘疾態(tài)度的改善比偶爾佩戴的好;(7)殘疾態(tài)度對(duì)佩戴助聽器后生存質(zhì)量的影響較大(標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化偏回歸系數(shù)=0.357)。結(jié)論:(1)杭州市聽力殘疾人的照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度和生存質(zhì)量不高,生存質(zhì)量與國(guó)外研究相比差距不大而與國(guó)內(nèi)其他研究相比較低,照顧質(zhì)量和殘疾態(tài)度相比于國(guó)內(nèi)其他研究較低。(2)聽力殘疾人照顧質(zhì)量、殘疾態(tài)度和生存質(zhì)量存在正相關(guān)。為改善聽力殘疾人的生存質(zhì)量,需要加強(qiáng)他們的健康管理,尤其是康復(fù)服務(wù),并給予生活、工作或?qū)W習(xí)上的支持和照顧;同時(shí)也要關(guān)注其心理健康,幫助他們樹立積極的人生態(tài)度,用樂(lè)觀的心態(tài)面對(duì)殘疾帶來(lái)的困難。(3)助聽器佩戴后聽力殘疾人的生存質(zhì)量和殘疾態(tài)度有所改善,說(shuō)明助聽器的佩戴對(duì)兩者產(chǎn)生正性影響并且經(jīng)常佩戴的人生存質(zhì)量改善的效果更明顯。因此,對(duì)于未佩戴助聽器的殘疾人來(lái)說(shuō)需要滿足他們對(duì)健康的需求,盡可能佩戴助聽器,并且需要提供完善的助聽器后續(xù)服務(wù),幫助聽力殘疾人適應(yīng)助聽器,發(fā)揮助聽器的作用,從而改善他們的生理健康,提高其生存質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:BACKGROUND: Hearing impairment not only affects the physical and mental health of hearing-impaired people, but also causes social problems such as family and social burdens. Wearing hearing aids can help them improve their hearing, improve their verbal communication ability, reduce their barriers to participating in social life, and thus improve their lives. Objective: To understand the status quo of care quality, disability attitude and quality of life of hearing-impaired people, and to evaluate the impact of hearing aids on hearing-impaired people from three aspects: care quality, disability attitude and quality of life. Methods: 198 hearing-impaired people in four districts of Hangzhou were investigated with the World Health Organization Care Quality Scale, Disability Attitude Scale and Quality of Life Scale. Results: (1) The main causes of hearing disability were found in Hangzhou city. Including medication, otitis media, nervousness, tympanic membrane perforation, sudden and hereditary; (2) 66.2% of hearing-impaired people thought their own quality of life was average, the average score of quality of life was 64.17 [9.30], physiological dimension was the lowest, and the correlation between quality of life and psychological dimension was the greatest (r = 0.895); (3) the average score of total quality of care was 5. The average score of disability attitude was 50.46+7.48; (4) Care quality, disability attitude and quality of life were positively correlated (r = 0.491, r = 0.439). Path analysis showed that the main influencing factors of the quality of life of hearing disabilities were care environment, tolerance, accessibility and care giving; (5) 195 hearing disabilities were interviewed and returned. The interview rate was 98.5%. In the past year, 44 of them did not wear hearing aids, 151 of them were wearing hearing aids, of which 59 were occasionally worn and 92 were frequently worn. (6) The quality of life of hearing-impaired people with hearing aids improved (t = 2.041, P = 0.043), mainly because the scores of physical and psychological dimensions were higher than those before wearing hearing aids, and their attitudes towards disability improved (t = 5.237, P 0.043). There was no significant difference in the scores of care quality of hearing-impaired people before and after wearing hearing aids (t = 1.832, P = 0.072); the improvement of quality of life and disability attitudes of people who often wear hearing aids were better than those who occasionally wear them; (7) disability attitudes had a greater impact on the quality of life after wearing hearing aids (standardized bias). The regression coefficient was 0.357. Conclusion: (1) The quality of care, disability attitudes and quality of life of hearing-impaired people in Hangzhou were not high. The quality of life of hearing-impaired people in Hangzhou was not much different from that of foreign studies, but lower than that of other domestic studies. The quality of care and disability attitudes were lower than those of other domestic studies. (2) The quality of care, disability attitudes and survival of hearing-impaired people in Hang In order to improve the quality of life of hearing-impaired people, it is necessary to strengthen their health management, especially rehabilitation services, and give them support and care in life, work or study. At the same time, it is also necessary to pay attention to their mental health, help them establish a positive attitude towards life and face the difficulties caused by disability with an optimistic attitude. The quality of life and disability attitudes of hearing-impaired people have improved after wearing hearing aids, indicating that wearing hearing aids has a positive effect on both of them and the effect of improving the quality of life of people who often wear hearing aids is more obvious. And it is necessary to provide perfect follow-up service of hearing aids to help hearing disabled people adapt to hearing aids and play the role of hearing aids, so as to improve their physical health and improve their quality of life.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：杭州師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R764

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魯宏華;陳魚;王巍;王悅;陳太生;徐開旭;趙暉;程巖;馬元煦;林鵬;;老年性聾患者佩戴助聽器效果的評(píng)估[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2016年10期

2 蔣旭霞;徐婭;;殘疾人就業(yè)影響因素調(diào)研報(bào)告——以宿遷市為例[J];學(xué)周刊;2016年04期

3 李春凱;歐穎;;智殘人士生活質(zhì)量與社會(huì)支持相關(guān)性研究——以南京市分析為例[J];云南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

4 何作順;張迪;李鴻;張態(tài);劉建園;;民族地區(qū)殘疾老年人生存質(zhì)量調(diào)查研究[J];現(xiàn)代預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2014年03期

5 尹銀;;家庭對(duì)殘疾人居家服務(wù)需求的影響——基于北京市的調(diào)查研究[J];殘疾人研究;2013年03期

6 銀芳;傅克禮;;以社會(huì)融合為導(dǎo)向的社區(qū)康復(fù)工作模式[J];中國(guó)康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年04期

7 鄭巧蘭;田琪;梁左宜;陶健婷;阮劍華;艾秋香;陳新林;方積乾;郝元濤;;世界衛(wèi)生組織殘疾人照顧質(zhì)量量表中文版的信度和效度[J];中國(guó)康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年04期

8 李沁q，

本文編號(hào)：2184351