【摘要】：目的:對比研究股骨近端防旋髓內釘InterTAN釘與股骨近端防旋髓內釘PFNA,在高齡股骨轉子間骨折中的臨床療效及手術技巧。方法:本實驗研究了自2014年12月至2016年12月,在我科進行救治的高齡股骨轉子間骨折患者,共48例。將患者分為兩組,用這兩種不同的固定方式分別進行治療,對比分析這兩種不同手術方式療效。其中InterTAN釘組23例;PFNA組25例。采用InterTAN釘與PFNA這兩種手術方式對患者進行治療。術前術后給予相同治療手段。對比兩組患者之間的一般資料,如傷后至手術間隔時間、手術時間、術中出血量、住院時間、愈合時間及髖關節(jié)評分等之間的差異。患者出院后第1、3、6、9、12月于門診隨訪,常規(guī)給予髖關節(jié)正側位X片,觀察骨折愈合情況,通過髖關節(jié)Harris功能評分對患者髖關節(jié)功能進行評估,從而評價手術療效。結果:48例患者均獲隨訪評估。InterTAN釘組手術時間80~185min,平均128.7min;術中出血量110~180ml,平均140ml。PFNA組手術時間40~120min,平均68.4min;術中出血量50~110ml,平均83.6ml。術后并發(fā)癥Inter TAN釘組呼吸系統(tǒng)感染者1例、下肢血栓形成者1例、髖內翻畸形者1例、髖部疼痛者2例;PFNA組呼吸系統(tǒng)感染1例、髖關節(jié)內翻畸形2例、髖關節(jié)疼痛3例。無傷口紅腫感染及膿液滲出、內置物切出股骨頸及內置物斷裂等并發(fā)癥,骨折全部愈合。術后9個月,根據(jù)髖關節(jié)Harries功能評分標準,InterTAN釘組優(yōu)12例,良8例,可2例,差1例,優(yōu)良率為87%;PFNA組優(yōu)13例,良9例,可1例,差2例,優(yōu)良率為88%。結論:InterTAN釘與PFNA這兩種手術方式對高齡股骨粗隆區(qū)骨折患者治療均有良好的治療效果,其中PFNA在手術時間和術中出血量方面更有優(yōu)勢。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical efficacy and surgical skills of InterTAN nail and PFNA, nail in the treatment of intertrochanter fracture in the elderly. Methods: from December 2014 to December 2016, 48 elderly patients with intertrochanter fracture were treated in our department. The patients were divided into two groups and treated with these two different fixation methods, and the curative effects of these two different surgical methods were compared and analyzed. There were 23 cases in InterTAN nail group and 25 cases in PFNA group. InterTAN nail and PFNA were used to treat the patients. The same treatment was given before and after operation. The general data between the two groups, such as the interval from injury to operation, the time of operation, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the time of hospitalization, the time of healing and the score of hip joint, were compared. The patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge. X-rays of the hip joint were given regularly to observe the fracture healing. The hip joint function was evaluated by the hip joint Harris function score, so as to evaluate the curative effect of the operation. Results: all the 48 patients were followed up and evaluated. The operation time was 80 脳 185 min (mean 128.7 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 110 min / 180 ml, the average operation time was 40 min / 120 min (mean 68.4 min), and the intraoperative blood loss was 50 min / 110 ml (mean 83.6 ml). There were 1 case of respiratory infection, 1 case of lower extremity thrombosis, 1 case of hip varus deformity and 2 cases of hip pain in Inter TAN nail group, and 1 case of respiratory infection, 2 cases of hip varus deformity and 3 cases of hip pain in PFNA group. There were no complications such as wound redness, swelling infection and pus exudation, and the fracture healed completely. According to the Harries function score of hip joint, 12 cases were excellent, 8 cases were good, 2 cases were fair and 1 case was poor 9 months after operation. The excellent and good rate was 87% in 13 cases, good in 9 cases, fair in 1 case, poor in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 88%. Conclusion: InterTAN nail and PFNA have good therapeutic effect on elderly patients with trochanter fracture, among which PFNA has more advantages in terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss.
【學位授予單位】：皖南醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R687.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 謝長偉;陳長青;原小兵;王賓;馬玉偉;侯立松;;股骨粗隆間骨折分型與內固定的選擇[J];中國骨與關節(jié)損傷雜志;2016年10期

2 周永強;;股骨遠端LISS鋼板倒置治療復雜股骨粗隆間骨折的療效分析[J];中國醫(yī)藥科學;2016年17期

3 張立峰;馮衛(wèi);林創(chuàng)鑫;于成涌;佟雁翔;李亞光;張哲漢;賈燕飛;;克氏針撬撥輔助復位技術治療不穩(wěn)定股骨轉子間骨折[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2016年14期

4 高志華;沈惠良;劉利民;周萌;;PFNA與InterTan系統(tǒng)治療老年股骨粗隆間骨折的療效觀察[J];廣西醫(yī)科大學學報;2016年03期

5 杜國聰;李啟中;楊朝華;吳堅;;DHS、PFNA和股骨近端鎖定鋼板內固定治療股骨粗隆間骨折的療效、預后及安全性比較[J];中國醫(yī)學創(chuàng)新;2016年05期

6 祝敬華;魏瑞林;;人工股骨頭置換術治療高齡患者不穩(wěn)定股骨粗隆間骨折的觀察(附17例報告)[J];湖北科技學院學報(醫(yī)學版);2015年05期

7 季英楠;阿良;趙忠海;鄧純博;;骨折分型及外側壁厚度對動力髖螺釘治療外側壁完整的股骨粗隆間骨折的影響[J];中國醫(yī)科大學學報;2015年09期

8 李金洪;楊友剛;孫紅振;胡波;劉鵬;趙建華;;不同手術方式治療老年人股骨粗隆間骨折的療效研究[J];實用老年醫(yī)學;2015年01期

9 張智海;劉忠厚;石少輝;李艷寧;;中國大陸地區(qū)以-2.5SD為診斷的骨質疏松癥發(fā)病率文獻回顧性研究[J];中國骨質疏松雜志;2015年01期

10 陳振沅;李開南;;股骨轉子間骨折的創(chuàng)傷機制及分型研究進展[J];福建醫(yī)藥雜志;2014年03期

，

本文編號：2482340