【摘要】：目的探討經(jīng)皮傷椎終板撬撥復(fù)位聯(lián)合短節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎骨折的臨床療效。方法選擇胸腰椎骨折患者68例,隨機分為觀察組36例和對照組32例。觀察組采用經(jīng)皮傷椎終板撬撥復(fù)位聯(lián)合短節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定治療,對照組采用經(jīng)皮短節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定治療。記錄兩組術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時間;術(shù)前及術(shù)后1、3、7天采用酶分析法檢測血清肌酸激酶;術(shù)前、術(shù)后1周、術(shù)后12個月記錄疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS)并行胸腰椎X線檢查,計算傷椎前緣高度比、傷椎終板高度比。結(jié)果觀察組與對照組術(shù)中出血量分別為(65.6±33.0)、(52.7±13.0)m L,手術(shù)時間分別為(107.9±10.2)、(83.9±9.5)min;兩組比較P均0.05。兩組術(shù)后1、3天血清肌酸激酶水平均高于同組術(shù)前(P均0.01),術(shù)后7天血清肌酸激酶水平與同組術(shù)前比較差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P均0.05)。兩組間手術(shù)前后各時間點血清肌酸激酶水平比較差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P均0.05)。兩組術(shù)后1周、術(shù)后12個月VAS均低于術(shù)前,且術(shù)后12個月降低更明顯(P0.05或0.01)。兩組術(shù)后1周、術(shù)后12個月傷椎前緣高度比、傷椎終板高度比均高于同組術(shù)前(P均0.01)。觀察組術(shù)后12個月傷椎前緣高度比、傷椎終板高度比均高于對照組,VAS低于對照組(P均0.05)。結(jié)論與經(jīng)皮短節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定比較,經(jīng)皮傷椎終板撬撥復(fù)位聯(lián)合短節(jié)段內(nèi)固定術(shù)治療胸腰椎骨折可更大程度地恢復(fù)脊柱生理曲度及傷椎完整性,減輕椎旁肌損傷及腰背部疼痛。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical effect of percutaneous disc prying reduction combined with short segment pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Sixty-eight patients with thoracolumbar fracture were randomly divided into observation group (n = 36) and control group (n = 32). The observation group was treated with percutaneous reduction of end plate and short segment pedicle screw fixation, while the control group was treated with percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation. Serum creatine kinase was detected by enzyme analysis before and 1 day after operation, and visual analogue score of pain (VAS) and thoracolumbar spine X-ray examination were recorded 1 week and 12 months after operation. The anterior height ratio of injured vertebrae and the ratio of end plate height of injured vertebra were calculated. Results the amount of intraoperative bleeding was (65.6 鹵33.0), () 52.7 鹵13.0) m L, in the observation group and (107.9 鹵10.2), (83.9 鹵9.5) min; in the control group (P < 0.05). The level of serum creatine kinase in the two groups was significantly higher than that in the same group on the 3rd day after operation (P 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups on the 7th day after operation compared with the same group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum creatine kinase levels between the two groups before and after operation (P 0.05). The VAS in both groups was lower than that before operation at 1 week and 12 months after operation, and the decrease was more significant at 12 months after operation (P0.05 or 0.01). At 1 week and 12 months after operation, the ratio of anterior height and end plate height of injured vertebrae in both groups was higher than that in the same group (P 0.01). At 12 months after operation, the ratio of anterior height and end plate height of injured vertebrae in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P 0.05). Conclusion compared with percutaneous short segment pedicle screw internal fixation, the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with percutaneous disc prying reduction combined with short segment internal fixation can recover the physiological curvature of spine and the integrity of injured vertebrae to a greater extent. Relieve paravertebral muscle injury and back pain.
【作者單位】： 臨沂市中心醫(yī)院;
【基金】：臨沂市科技發(fā)展計劃項目(201515034)
【分類號】：R687.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡建春,姚興玲;撬撥復(fù)位骨水泥注入治療老年脛骨平臺壓縮骨折[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2005年07期

2 梁定順,穆廣態(tài);撬撥復(fù)位治療橈骨頸骨折[J];華北煤炭醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

3 丁煒,傅強,殷利民;經(jīng)皮插針撬撥復(fù)位配合鍛煉治療跟骨損傷療效探討[J];現(xiàn)代康復(fù);2001年06期

4 韓立新,李旭芬,李鳳新;跟骨壓縮性骨折切開復(fù)位與撬撥復(fù)位治療比較[J];中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志;2004年06期

5 田子軍;王策;;撬撥復(fù)位治療跟骨骨折244例[J];現(xiàn)代中醫(yī)藥;2009年05期

6 劉傳見;王林曉;秦超;;經(jīng)椎弓根釘撬撥復(fù)位治療胸腰椎骨折效果觀察[J];中國傷殘醫(yī)學(xué);2013年07期

7 趙建中;孟氏骨折撬撥復(fù)位法(附5例臨床報告)[J];陜西新醫(yī)藥;1986年08期

8 李瑞琦;張國平;任立中;趙峰;高宏陽;王偉;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡下撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮固定治療脛骨Pilon骨折[J];現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志;2008年27期

9 唐景暉;;撬撥復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定治療Ⅲ型Pilon骨折[J];臨床骨科雜志;2009年05期

10 何樂善;;手法配合撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮穿針“△”形交叉固定治療脛(腓)骨下端粉碎性骨折30例[J];湖南中醫(yī)雜志;2014年07期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 陳金民;丁晶;徐永清;楊軍;陳益果;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡下撬撥復(fù)位治療脛骨平臺Schatzker Ⅲ型骨折[A];第六屆西部骨科論壇暨貴州省骨科年會論文匯編[C];2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 趙雙利;撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮空心釘內(nèi)固定治療脛骨平臺Ⅱ、Ⅲ型骨折臨床觀察[D];遼寧中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2007年

2 江山;撬撥復(fù)位外固定支架治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端粉碎性骨折的療效觀察[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

3 趙彥瑞;撬撥復(fù)位和切開復(fù)位內(nèi)固定治療SandersⅡ型跟骨折療效比較[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年

4 姚碩;推頂撬撥復(fù)位鋼板固定治療脛骨平臺Schatzker Ⅱ型骨折的臨床觀察[D];湖北中醫(yī)學(xué)院;2009年

，

本文編號：2220855