內(nèi)植多元磁棒聯(lián)合脈沖電磁場(chǎng)對(duì)兔骨及軟骨損傷修復(fù)的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究
[Abstract]:Objective In order to explore a feasible loading method of magnetic field technology, magnetostatic rods for in vivo implantation were constructed with magnetostat as the original material, and the role of in vivo magnetic source combined with in vitro pulsed electromagnetic field in bone and cartilage tissue repair was clarified. Methods 1. According to the previous research foundation and related papers on magnetic field. Under the guidance of experts in the field of bioengineering, Nd-Fe-B permanent magnets with stable magnetic properties were selected as the basic components to construct the internal magnetic poles of multicomponent magnetic rods implanted in vivo. The external magnetic poles were made of medical titanium alloy materials with good biocompatibility and biomechanical strength. The physical properties of the implanted multivariate magnetic rods were measured by sealed coating. 2. The experimental study of implanted multivariate magnetic rods combined with pulsed electromagnetic field for repairing bone defects in rabbits: All experimental New Zealand white rabbits were selected to establish the femoral condyle defect model. According to the experimental intervention methods, they were divided into combined magnetic field group, pulsed electromagnetic field group and control group, combined magnetic field group. Pulsed electromagnetic field group and control group were implanted non-magnetic titanium alloy rods in the distal femoral shaft medullary cavity of rabbits respectively. Pulsed electromagnetic field group was implanted non-magnetic titanium alloy rods in the distal femoral shaft medullary cavity of rabbits after operation. Pulsed electromagnetic field group was applied in vitro after operation (1h/d). The femurs of each group were harvested at the 5th week after operation. The distal bone samples were grossly, histologically and radiologically assessed; 3. Experimental study of cartilage defect repair with implanted multivariate magnetic rods combined with pulsed electromagnetic field in rabbits: All experimental New Zealand white rabbits were selected to establish the femoral trochlear cartilage defect model, which was also divided into combined magnetic field group, pulsed electromagnetic field group and control group. Pulsed electromagnetic field group and control group were implanted non-magnetic titanium alloy rods in the distal femoral shaft medullary cavity of rabbits. Pulsed electromagnetic field group and control group were implanted non-magnetic titanium alloy rods in the distal femoral shaft medullary cavity of rabbits. Pulsed electromagnetic field group were applied in vitro after operation (1h/d). Each group was at the 4th week and 10th week after operation, respectively. Results 1. The multicomponent magnetic rods for implantation in the medullary cavity of the distal femoral shaft of rabbits were cylindrical-like with a length of 25.0 mm and a diameter of 7.0 mm. The magnetic field distribution on the surface of the magnetic rod changed between strong and weak phases. The maximum magnetic induction intensity was 40 The results showed that the external bone of the combined magnetic field group basically healed completely and continued with the peripheral bone. Compared with the pulsed electromagnetic field group and the control group, the cortical and subcortical bone regeneration increased significantly, and the trabecular bone morphology and continuity were better. The quantitative analysis of the bone tissue of the combined magnetic field group and the control group showed that the bone defect site was more than that of the combined magnetic field group. Bone volume fraction and trabecular bone number increased significantly (P 0.05), but trabecular bone segregation decreased (P 0.01). There was no significant difference in trabecular bone thickness. Compared with pulsed electromagnetic field group, the number of trabecular bone increased (P 0.05) and trabecular bone segregation decreased (P 0.01) in combined magnetic field group. The gross morphology of cartilage repair in the combined magnetic field group was better than that in the control group (P 0.05) at the 4th week after operation, and there was no significant difference between the combined magnetic field group and the pulsed electromagnetic field group (P 0.05). At the 10th week after operation, the gross morphology score of cartilage repair in the combined magnetic field group was significantly better than that in the control group (P 0.01) and the pulsed electromagnetic field group (P 0.05). At the fourth week, the combined magnetic field group was significantly better than the control group (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the combined magnetic field group and the pulsed electromagnetic field group (P 0.05). At the tenth week, the combined magnetic field group was significantly better than the control group (P 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the combined magnetic field group and the pulsed electromagnetic field group (P 0.05). The results showed that GAG levels in control group, pulse electromagnetic field group and combined magnetic field group were 12.26 65507 The content of GAG in pulsed electromagnetic field group and combined magnetic field group was significantly higher than that in control group (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the combined magnetic field group and pulsed electromagnetic field group (P 0.05). Electromagnetic field combined with magnetic field can promote bone formation and improve bone microstructure better than single pulse electromagnetic field and control group under the same tissue trauma condition. At the same time, it can enhance the early morphological repair and interface integration of articular cartilage and improve the aminoglycan matrix in cartilage tissue. The results of this study preliminarily confirm the feasibility of the mode of action of implanted magnetic field, and have important research value for local targeted magnetic field therapy and long-term magnetic attachment application of orthopedic implants.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:R68
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 周予婧;王樸;陳紅英;劉遄;季僑丹;陽(yáng)筱甜;高強(qiáng);何成奇;;脈沖電磁場(chǎng)對(duì)大鼠骨髓間充質(zhì)干細(xì)胞增殖、成骨分化和Wnt/β-catenin信號(hào)通路的影響[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2015年03期
2 王運(yùn)鋒;何蕾;郭薇;;醫(yī)用鈦合金的研究及應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀[J];鈦工業(yè)進(jìn)展;2015年01期
3 于振濤;韓建業(yè);麻西群;余森;張明華;張于勝;;生物醫(yī)用鈦合金材料的生物及力學(xué)相容性[J];中國(guó)組織工程研究;2013年25期
4 胡文艷;;釹鐵硼永磁材料的性能及研究進(jìn)展[J];現(xiàn)代電子技術(shù);2012年02期
5 程國(guó)政;陳克明;李志鋒;周建;韋哲;白孟海;趙宏斌;;正弦交變電磁場(chǎng)促進(jìn)大鼠骨髓間充質(zhì)干細(xì)胞成骨性分化的研究[J];生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程學(xué)雜志;2011年04期
6 周建;陳克明;葛寶豐;程國(guó)政;王嘉琪;韋哲;;50Hz正弦交變電磁場(chǎng)促進(jìn)體外培養(yǎng)成骨細(xì)胞分化成熟的雙“強(qiáng)度窗”效應(yīng)[J];生物物理學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期
7 崔向榮;蘇偉;黃釗;覃萬(wàn)安;;高頻脈沖電磁場(chǎng)對(duì)骨髓間充質(zhì)干細(xì)胞增殖和成骨分化的影響[J];中國(guó)組織工程研究與臨床康復(fù);2011年10期
8 周通華;戴閩;鄒文楠;;靜磁場(chǎng)對(duì)成骨細(xì)胞生物學(xué)影響機(jī)制的研究進(jìn)展[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2010年06期
,本文編號(hào):2182357
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2182357.html