本文選題：橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折 + 不穩(wěn)定骨折��； 參考：《廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:通過對(duì)比研究手法整復(fù)結(jié)合改良克氏針內(nèi)固定術(shù)和切開復(fù)位鋼板螺釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折不穩(wěn)定型骨折的臨床療效,為老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端不穩(wěn)定型骨折治療方法的選擇提供臨床依據(jù)。方法:選取2015年3月～2016年9月深圳平樂骨傷科醫(yī)院老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折患者60例,隨機(jī)將患者分為實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組,每組30例,實(shí)驗(yàn)組予手法整復(fù)結(jié)合改良克氏針內(nèi)固定術(shù),對(duì)照組予切開復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定術(shù)。記錄兩組患者手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量;兩組患者于術(shù)前、術(shù)后、術(shù)后6周、術(shù)后3個(gè)月拍攝X線片并測(cè)量掌傾角、尺偏角及橈側(cè)高度變化:采用視覺模擬疼痛評(píng)分(VAS)評(píng)價(jià)兩組患者術(shù)后當(dāng)日、術(shù)后3天、術(shù)后1周、術(shù)后6周腕關(guān)節(jié)疼痛情況;采用Gartland-Werley腕關(guān)節(jié)評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià)兩組患者術(shù)后3個(gè)月、術(shù)后6個(gè)月的腕關(guān)節(jié)功能;記錄兩組患者術(shù)后不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生情況、住院天數(shù)、治療費(fèi)用及患者滿意度。采用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件SPSS 22.0對(duì)統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析。結(jié)果:兩組患者基本資料比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組手術(shù)時(shí)間及術(shù)中出血量明顯少于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組患者之間的術(shù)后當(dāng)日、術(shù)后3天、術(shù)后1周、術(shù)后6周VAS疼痛評(píng)分比較,術(shù)后當(dāng)日、術(shù)后3天、術(shù)后1周VAS疼痛評(píng)分,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),術(shù)后6周VAS疼痛評(píng)分,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組患者之間的術(shù)前、術(shù)后、術(shù)后6周、術(shù)后3個(gè)月掌傾角比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組患者之間的術(shù)前、術(shù)后橈骨高度比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),術(shù)后6周、術(shù)后3個(gè)月橈骨高度比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組患者之間的術(shù)前尺偏角比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),術(shù)后、術(shù)后6周、術(shù)后3個(gè)月尺偏角比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組患者術(shù)后3個(gè)月、術(shù)后6個(gè)月復(fù)查Gartland-Werley腕關(guān)節(jié)評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià)腕關(guān)節(jié)功能,術(shù)后3個(gè)月,實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組的優(yōu)良率分別為66.67%、76.67%,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),術(shù)后6個(gè)月,實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組的優(yōu)良率分別為83.33%、86.67%,,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者住院天數(shù)、治療費(fèi)用均明顯低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率分別為3.33%、10.00%,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組患者術(shù)后3個(gè)月隨訪時(shí)主觀滿意度比較,實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組的滿意率分別為93.33%、73.33%,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論:兩種治療方式對(duì)于老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折均有較好的臨床療效,在恢復(fù)掌傾角、尺偏角及橈骨高度方面,手法整復(fù)結(jié)合改良克氏針內(nèi)固定術(shù)低于切開復(fù)位鋼板螺釘內(nèi)固定術(shù),但是后期腕關(guān)節(jié)功能恢復(fù)無差異,且前者住院天數(shù)、治療費(fèi)用均明顯低于后者,前者滿意度高于后者,綜合考慮老年人群的特殊生理階段,手法整復(fù)結(jié)合改良克氏針內(nèi)固定術(shù)治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端不穩(wěn)定型骨折更易被老年患者接受。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the clinical effect of manual reduction combined with modified Kirschner needle fixation and open reduction plate screw fixation in the treatment of unstable fractures of distal radius in the elderly. To provide clinical basis for the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly. Methods: from March 2015 to September 2016, 60 patients with distal radius fracture in Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic and Trauma Hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 30 cases in each group. The experimental group was treated with manual reduction combined with modified Kirschner needle fixation. The control group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation with steel plate. The time of operation and blood loss during operation were recorded in both groups, and X-ray films were taken before operation, 6 weeks after operation and 3 months after operation, and the angle of palm inclination was measured. The changes of ulnar angle and radial height: visual analogue pain score (VAS) was used to evaluate the wrist joint pain on the same day, 3 days, 1 week and 6 weeks after operation, and Gartland-Werley wrist score was used to evaluate the postoperative 3 months. Wrist joint function 6 months after operation, adverse reactions, hospitalization days, treatment costs and patients' satisfaction were recorded in the two groups. The statistical data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0. Results: there was no significant difference in basic data between the two groups (P0.05). The time of operation and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the experimental group were significantly less than those in the control group (P0.05); the VAS pain scores were compared between the two groups on the postoperative day, 3 days, 1 week, 6 weeks after operation, 3 days after operation and 6 weeks after operation. VAS pain score at 1 week after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS pain score at 6 weeks after operation (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the radial height between the two groups before and after operation (P0.05). The difference was statistically significant (P0.05), there was no significant difference in the preoperative ulnar deviation between the two groups (P0.05), the difference was statistically significant at 6 weeks and 3 months after operation (P0.05); 3 months after operation, there were significant differences between the two groups (P0.05). Six months after operation, Gartland-Werley wrist score was performed to evaluate wrist function. The excellent and good rates of the experimental group and the control group were 66.67 and 76.67, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05), but at 6 months after operation, the excellent and good rates of the two groups were 66.67 and 76.67 respectively (P0.05). The excellent and good rates of the experimental group and the control group were 83.33 and 86.67, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05); the days of hospitalization and the cost of treatment of the patients in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group and the control group were 3.33 and 10.00 respectively, the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05); the subjective satisfaction of the two groups was compared after 3 months follow-up. The satisfaction rates of the experimental group and the control group were 93.33 and 73.33, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: both methods have good clinical effect in the treatment of distal radius fracture in the elderly. In the recovery of palmar inclination angle, ulnar deviation angle and radius height, manual reduction combined with modified Kirschner needle internal fixation is lower than open reduction plate and screw fixation. But there was no difference in the recovery of wrist function in the later stage, and the days of hospitalization and the cost of treatment of the former were significantly lower than those of the latter, and the satisfaction of the former was higher than that of the latter. Manual reduction combined with modified Kirschner needle fixation for unstable distal radius fractures is more acceptable in elderly patients.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R687.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 康寶林;王東建;張?chǎng)?;掌側(cè)與背側(cè)入路切開復(fù)位內(nèi)固定治療C型橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的比較研究[J];實(shí)用骨科雜志;2016年03期

2 鄭上團(tuán);吳斗;郝�；�;劉強(qiáng);;橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的治療進(jìn)展[J];中華骨科雜志;2016年05期

3 寧仁德;姚濤;孔令超;呂飛飛;周業(yè)金;;掌背側(cè)聯(lián)合入路手術(shù)治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端AO C3型骨折[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2015年09期

4 朱彥昭;蔣麗娜;黃雷;張峰;申成春;徐榮明;;掌側(cè)鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療C型橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的臨床療效觀察[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2015年07期

5 吳京亮;魏更生;吳磊;張叢笑;;非橋接式與橋接式外固定架治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的對(duì)比研究[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2015年S1期

6 張兵兵;邵建軍;袁治國(guó);白登彥;楊世寧;;髓內(nèi)釘技術(shù)治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的臨床研究[J];實(shí)用骨科雜志;2014年12期

7 劉凌;楊炎;潘俊;沈敏杰;楊惠林;;掌側(cè)鎖定鋼板治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折術(shù)后中長(zhǎng)期腕關(guān)節(jié)功能的隨訪[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2014年24期

8 吳鋒;葉勁;莫茅;鄒仲兵;;微創(chuàng)掌側(cè)鎖定加壓鋼板治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的療效分析[J];中國(guó)臨床解剖學(xué)雜志;2014年03期

9 陳昌紅;周榮魁;;掌側(cè)和背側(cè)鋼板內(nèi)固定治療背側(cè)不穩(wěn)定性橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的病例對(duì)照研究[J];中國(guó)骨傷;2013年02期

10 霍力為;王廣偉;庾偉中;黃宏興;黃崇博;;同一機(jī)構(gòu)1年1875例橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折流行病學(xué)分布特征[J];中國(guó)組織工程研究;2012年30期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周曉寧;腕關(guān)節(jié)三維有限元模型的建立及橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折發(fā)生機(jī)制的生物力學(xué)分析[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2087814