本文選題：膝關(guān)節(jié) + 脫位　； 參考：《中國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》2016年12期

【摘要】：目的:探討關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助治療難復(fù)性膝關(guān)節(jié)后外側(cè)脫位的臨床療效。方法:2009年1月至2014年5月,采用關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助治療難復(fù)性膝關(guān)節(jié)后外側(cè)脫位并隨訪2年以上患者13例,男8例,女5例;年齡27~56歲,平均37.8歲。受傷至手術(shù)時(shí)間1~3天,平均1.84天。所有患者于關(guān)節(jié)鏡下復(fù)位后,一期重建前后交叉韌帶并修復(fù)或重建損傷的內(nèi)外側(cè)副韌帶。術(shù)后膝關(guān)節(jié)穩(wěn)定性評(píng)價(jià)采用體格檢查、KT-1000和Telos應(yīng)力像,后兩者測(cè)量結(jié)果根據(jù)IKDC膝關(guān)節(jié)檢查表進(jìn)行分類(正常、接近正常、異常和嚴(yán)重異常);患者臨床功能評(píng)價(jià)采用IKDC評(píng)分、Lysholm評(píng)分、Tegner評(píng)分和滿意率。結(jié)果:隨訪時(shí)間為24~56個(gè)月,平均32.6個(gè)月。末次隨訪時(shí),患者膝關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度為2.69°±5.63°~132.69°±11.66°。Lachman試驗(yàn)和軸移試驗(yàn)均陰性12例,均1+陽(yáng)性1例;后抽屜試驗(yàn)陰性11例,1+陽(yáng)性2例;屈膝30°位內(nèi)翻應(yīng)力試驗(yàn)陰性13例;屈膝30°位外翻應(yīng)力試驗(yàn)陰性11例,1+陽(yáng)性1例,2+陽(yáng)性1例。KT-1000示患者膝關(guān)節(jié)前后向總位移和單純前移的側(cè)-側(cè)差值分別為2.15±1.57 mm和1.61±0.86 mm。Telos應(yīng)力像示術(shù)后前移側(cè)-側(cè)差值為2.23±0.92 mm,后移為3.23±1.16 mm,內(nèi)側(cè)間隙為1.77±1.87 mm,外側(cè)間隙為0.46±0.52 mm�；颊咝g(shù)前IKDC評(píng)分、Lysholm評(píng)分和Tegner評(píng)分分別為11.13±2.27分、1.31±2.59分和0.00±0.00分,術(shù)后分別為79.76±8.33分、84.53±6.39分和5.07±1.26分,術(shù)前術(shù)后臨床功能評(píng)分差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=27.02,P=0.001;t=45.72,P=0.001;t=14.58,P=0.001)。其中10例患者對(duì)術(shù)后臨床療效表示滿意或非常滿意,滿意率為76.9%。多重線性回歸示患者體重指數(shù)與術(shù)后臨床療效的相關(guān)性有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=-4.21,P=0.001)。結(jié)論:采用關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助治療難復(fù)性膝關(guān)節(jié)后外側(cè)脫位,一期重建前后交叉韌帶并修復(fù)或重建損傷的內(nèi)外側(cè)副韌帶,患者術(shù)后膝關(guān)節(jié)穩(wěn)定性和臨床功能較術(shù)前均有顯著改善,患者術(shù)后滿意率達(dá)76.9%。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopic adjuvant treatment of posterolateral dislocation of refractory knee joint.Methods: from January 2009 to May 2014, 13 patients (8 males and 5 females) with intractable posterolateral dislocation of the knee were treated with arthroscopy and followed up for more than 2 years, with an average age of 37.8 years (2756 years).The time from injury to operation was 1 to 3 days, with an average of 1.84 days.After arthroscopic reduction, the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments were reconstructed and the injured internal and external collateral ligaments were repaired or reconstructed.After operation, the knee joint stability was evaluated by physical examination KT-1000 and Telos stress images. The results of the latter two measurements were classified according to the IKDC knee joint examination table (normal, close to normal).IKDC score and Lysholm score and Tegner score and satisfaction rate were used to evaluate the clinical function of the patients.Results: the follow-up time was 24 ~ 56 months (mean 32.6 months).At the last follow-up, the range of motion of knee joint was 2.69 擄鹵5.63 擄鹵132.69 擄鹵11.66 擄. Lachman test and axial shift test were all negative in 12 cases, all of them were positive in 1 case, 11 cases were negative in posterior drawer test, 13 cases were negative in flexion 30 擄varus stress test.Lateral displacement of knee joint was 2.15 鹵1. 57mm and 1. 61 鹵0. 86 mm.Telos stress imaging showed that the lateral-lateral difference of knee joint displacement was 2. 15 鹵1. 57mm and 1. 61 鹵0. 86 mm.Telos stress imaging showed that the lateral-lateral difference of knee joint total displacement and simple forward displacement were 2. 15 鹵1. 57mm and 1. 61 鹵0. 86 mm.Telos respectively2.23 鹵0.92 mm, 3.23 鹵1.16 mm, 1.77 鹵1.87 mm in medial space and 0.46 鹵0.52 mm in lateral space.Among them, 10 cases were satisfied or very satisfied with the clinical effect after operation, the satisfaction rate was 76. 9%.Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative clinical efficacy was statistically significant.Conclusion: arthroscopic adjuvant treatment of posterolateral dislocation of the refractory knee joint, primary reconstruction of anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and repair or reconstruction of the injured internal and external collateral ligaments, the stability and clinical function of the knee joint after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation.The satisfaction rate of the patients was 76. 9%.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學(xué)附屬福州第二醫(yī)院運(yùn)動(dòng)損傷科;
【基金】：福建省自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(2016J01481)
【分類號(hào)】：R687.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宿華偉,苗智軍,鄧永忠;青少年難復(fù)性肱骨外科頸骨折23例治療體會(huì)[J];西北國(guó)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1998年01期

2 常西海,李炳輝,張漢瑜,張慶,王國(guó)勝;嚴(yán)重移位難復(fù)性兒童肱骨髁上骨折12 例報(bào)告[J];山東醫(yī)藥;1999年16期

3 王永福,王羽,許國(guó)華,柏青;難復(fù)性肱骨外科頸骨折86例手術(shù)治療體會(huì)[J];人民軍醫(yī);1999年08期

4 李銘雄;張細(xì)祥;魏志勇;林天輝;陳王;;經(jīng)皮器械復(fù)位法治療難復(fù)性骨折848例[J];世界中醫(yī)藥;2010年03期

5 肖修亭，劉慶鐸;難復(fù)性外傷性髕骨側(cè)方脫位一例報(bào)告[J];中華骨科雜志;1994年09期

6 陳關(guān)福;真皮瓣移植治療顳下頜關(guān)節(jié)“難復(fù)性脫位”[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).口腔醫(yī)學(xué)分冊(cè);1982年06期

7 周云方,馬大年,錢忠東,李紅玲;應(yīng)用小切口治療難復(fù)性肱骨外科頸骨折18例分析[J];骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;1998年05期

8 邢成林;朱俊英;;4例難復(fù)性斜疝局部外傷后手術(shù)切口的選擇[J];基層醫(yī)學(xué)論壇;2003年06期

9 劉敬峰,高鳳敏;難復(fù)性腹股溝斜疝致隱睪1例[J];現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志;2003年19期

10 王秋根;楊瑞和;張春才;;髖關(guān)節(jié)難復(fù)性脫位3例報(bào)告[J];骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;1989年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前5條

1 李杰;;肩零度復(fù)位法治療難復(fù)性肱骨外科頸骨折機(jī)理討論[A];第11屆全國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合骨傷科學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文匯編[C];2003年

2 池永龍;徐華梓;黃其杉;毛方敏;林焱;王向陽(yáng);倪文飛;王勝;胡月正;;經(jīng)皮內(nèi)鏡下治療難復(fù)性C_(1、2)脫位[A];2005年浙江省骨科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2005年

3 謝杰;向明;陳杭;楊國(guó)勇;;運(yùn)用鉸鏈外固定支架治療難復(fù)性肘關(guān)節(jié)脫位療效初步分析[A];第六屆西部骨科論壇暨貴州省骨科年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2010年

4 成俊;池雷霆;陳經(jīng)勇;陳如見;李鐘;;經(jīng)皮復(fù)位在治療難復(fù)性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折中的應(yīng)用[A];第七屆全國(guó)創(chuàng)傷學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨2009海峽兩岸創(chuàng)傷醫(yī)學(xué)論壇論文匯編[C];2009年

5 嚴(yán)盈奇;戴加平;龔遂良;陳剛;童春民;;前方開窗復(fù)位經(jīng)皮內(nèi)固定治療青壯年難復(fù)性股骨頸骨折的解剖研究與臨床應(yīng)用[A];2012年浙江省骨科學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 宋建新 李濤;治療難復(fù)性肩關(guān)節(jié)前脫位新方法[N];中國(guó)中醫(yī)藥報(bào);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1743386