本文選題：外踝骨折　切入點：分型　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：解剖鎖定鋼板及髓內(nèi)釘治療外踝骨折Danis-weber B及C型骨折比較研究背景:外踝骨折治療需視為關(guān)節(jié)內(nèi)骨折進行治療,為了盡量減低術(shù)后關(guān)節(jié)僵硬、創(chuàng)傷性關(guān)節(jié)炎等并發(fā)癥,治療原則上需給予骨折處解剖復(fù)位、堅強內(nèi)固定及術(shù)后早期功能鍛煉。對于外踝骨折存在多種治療方案及內(nèi)固定方法,切開復(fù)位合并鋼板內(nèi)固定的治療是常用的治療方法,手術(shù)操作對醫(yī)師的技術(shù)要求不高,可在直視下復(fù)位骨折達到解剖復(fù)位,但術(shù)后并發(fā)癥相對較高。隨著mippo技術(shù)理念的深入及內(nèi)固定材料種類變化,髓內(nèi)釘治療外踝骨折提供了新的備選方案,由于其手術(shù)要求的切口相對較小,而且術(shù)后出現(xiàn)并發(fā)癥的幾率也較小,但對醫(yī)師的操作技術(shù)要求較高,能提供良好的影像學(xué)結(jié)果和功能恢復(fù)。目的:外踝骨折Danis-Weber B及C型骨折,分別采用Synthes解剖鎖定鋼板及Acumed腓骨髓內(nèi)釘固定的相關(guān)問題進行比較。方法:分析2014年01月—2016年04月在吉林大學(xué)第一醫(yī)院100例外踝骨折分別采用解剖鎖定鋼板及髓內(nèi)釘治療比較。記類采用Danis-Weber分型,針對B及C型外踝骨折,采用解剖鎖定鋼板60例,采用髓內(nèi)釘40例,對病例性別、年齡、軟組織情況及關(guān)節(jié)脫位、住院日、手術(shù)時間、出血、切口愈合情況、是否合并感染、骨折復(fù)位、骨折愈合、踝關(guān)節(jié)功能等進行觀察。結(jié)果:兩組手術(shù)醫(yī)師分別完成外踝使用Synthes解剖鎖定鋼板及Acumed髓內(nèi)釘?shù)幕颊咴谛詣e、年齡、軟組織情況及關(guān)節(jié)脫位等方面差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。平均住院日及骨折愈合時間上差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。骨折復(fù)位標準均達到解剖復(fù)位。Baird-Jackson踝關(guān)節(jié)評分在疼痛、行走能力、踝關(guān)節(jié)穩(wěn)定、跑步能力、工作能力、踝關(guān)節(jié)活動范圍、X線片評估骨折復(fù)位結(jié)果及總分上差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05),手術(shù)時間、手術(shù)出血量、切口長度、切口并發(fā)癥等方面有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05),由于使用內(nèi)固定物材料非一種材質(zhì)及受骨折合并類型影響,住院費暫時無比較意義。結(jié)論:在外踝骨折Danis-Weber B及C型骨折中,髓內(nèi)釘相比解剖鎖定鋼板是更為高效的辦法,能夠較少手術(shù)出血量及降低手術(shù)切口并發(fā)癥。對于大多數(shù)的外踝骨折,切開復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定仍然是常規(guī)的固定手段,適應(yīng)癥廣,能使腓骨遠端骨折達到解剖復(fù)位,且固定可靠,取得良好的功能恢復(fù),臨床操作相對簡單,選取鋼板為內(nèi)固定物材料、由于在骨折處行手術(shù)切口,受骨折處軟組織條件影響較大,術(shù)后出現(xiàn)皮緣壞死、鋼板外露、甚至感染幾率相比髓內(nèi)針升高。髓內(nèi)釘為閉合復(fù)位,操作技術(shù)要求較高,需要一定的硬件設(shè)施且術(shù)中透視次數(shù)較多,骨折復(fù)位情況較解剖鋼板略差。微創(chuàng)閉合復(fù)位利于保護軟組織及較少骨膜剝離,減少骨折血運破壞,利于骨折愈合,減少皮膚壞死及感染可能;髓內(nèi)縱向固定,符合生物力學(xué)穩(wěn)定性,術(shù)后早期功能鍛煉,二次手術(shù)易取出。內(nèi)固定不適性小,較少要求取出,但最終兩組骨折的臨床愈合時間以及遠期踝關(guān)節(jié)功能的恢復(fù)無明顯差異。臨床工作中,需要根據(jù)患者的經(jīng)濟條件及依從性、軟組織條件、骨折類型等具體情況合理選擇內(nèi)固定方法及材料。
[Abstract]:Anatomical locking plate and intramedullary nail in the treatment of Danis-weber type C and B fractures of the lateral malleolus fracture of lateral malleolus: comparative study on background therapy should be treated as intra-articular fracture, in order to minimize postoperative ankylosis, traumatic arthritis and other complications, the treatment principle should be given fracture anatomical reduction, rigid fixation and early postoperative function exercise. For a variety of treatment programs and the methods of internal fixation of lateral malleolus fracture, incision reduction plate fixation is associated with the common treatment, the operation requirements of medical technology is not high, in the direct manipulation of the fracture anatomical reduction, but the complications are relatively high. With the change of type MIPPO technology concept deeply and internal fixation, intramedullary nail in the treatment of lateral malleolus fractures provide new alternatives, because of its relatively small incision operation requirements, and postoperative complications of the few The rate is also smaller, but the operation technology of medical demand is higher, can provide good imaging results and recovery function. Objective: Danis-Weber B lateral malleolus fractures and C fractures, were used to compare Synthes anatomic locking plate fixation nail related problems and Acumed. Methods: the fibular bone marrow of 2014 01 - 04 2016 in No.1 Hospital of Jilin University 100 cases of ankle fractures by anatomical locking plate and intramedullary nail in the treatment of class. Note the Danis-Weber classification, the B and C type lateral malleolus fractures with anatomical locking plate in 60 cases, with an intramedullary nail in 40 cases, the age of patients, gender, soft tissue and joint dislocation, hospitalization days, the operation time, bleeding, wound healing, infection, fracture reduction, fracture healing, ankle joint function were observed. Results: the two groups of surgeons were completed using Synthes lateral anatomical locking plate and Ac Umed intramedullary nail in patients with gender, age, no statistically significant difference between soft tissue and joint dislocation and so on (P0.05). The average hospitalization days and healing time had no significant difference (P0.05). Fracture reduction standard anatomic reduction was achieved in.Baird-Jackson ankle joint scoring ability to walk in pain, and ankle joint stability running ability, work ability, range of motion of the ankle, X-ray evaluation of fracture reduction results and total score difference was not statistically significant (P0.05), operation time, bleeding volume, incision length, incision complications had statistical significance and other aspects (P0.05), due to a non material and by using internal fixation combined with fracture type materials, hospital fees temporarily no comparison significance. Conclusion: Danis-Weber B and C in the lateral malleolus fracture, intramedullary nail with anatomical locking plate is a more efficient method to do, less amount of bleeding The surgical incision and reduce the complications. For most of the lateral malleolus fracture, internal fixation is still fixed conventional means, wide indications, the anatomical reduction of the distal fibula fracture, and fixed reliable, good functional recovery, clinical operation is relatively simple, for selecting plate internal fixation materials, due to the fractures. Surgical incision, fracture by soft tissue conditions affected the edge of skin necrosis after operation, plate exposure, even the infection rate increased. Compared to intramedullary nail intramedullary nail for closed reduction operation, higher technical requirements, need certain hardware facilities and intraoperative fluoroscopy times more reduction slightly worse than the anatomical plate fracture minimally invasive closed reduction. To protect the soft tissue and less periosteal stripping, reduction of blood supply damage, conducive to fracture healing, reduce skin necrosis and infection; intramedullary fixation with longitudinal, biomechanics Stability, early postoperative functional exercise, the two operation easy to remove the internal fixation. The discomfort of small, less demanding out, but in the end of two groups of fracture healing time and long-term ankle function recovery. No significant differences in the clinical work, according to the economic conditions of patients and compliance, soft tissue conditions reasonable selection of internal fixation methods and material fracture type specific circumstances.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R687.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 史寶明;鄭平;侯效正;楊博;劉永軍;田繼暄;王偉;;介紹一種外踝骨折的固定方法[J];實用骨科雜志;2009年12期

2 徐松寶;王樹偉;;可吸收釘治療外踝骨折28例臨床報道[J];中國民康醫(yī)學(xué);2013年15期

3 周玉寬;單純外踝骨折手術(shù)和非手術(shù)治療臨床效果比較[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2002年10期

4 張龍君 ,王水橋 ,張建軍 ,陳建良 ,葉鋒 ,王曉 ,鄭曉東;內(nèi)、外踝骨折誤診、誤治15例報告[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2004年11期

5 何平;鞏萬均;張成榮;;克氏針張力帶鋼絲治療外踝骨折40例[J];現(xiàn)代臨床醫(yī)學(xué);2005年06期

6 樊培新;孫勇;譚萍娟;郭玉龍;;經(jīng)皮穿針治療外踝骨折[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2006年10期

7 張彪;周玉寬;;外踝骨折的治療(附40例分析)[J];淮海醫(yī)藥;2008年02期

8 黃銘圖;農(nóng)必華;米琨;;外踝骨折治療現(xiàn)狀及研究進展[J];遼寧中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年10期

9 張戈;馬廣蕊;;單純外踝骨折三種治療方法的效果比較[J];中國社區(qū)醫(yī)師(醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè));2010年28期

10 趙紅平;關(guān)于外踝骨折的再認識及其治療方法探討[J];中國農(nóng)村醫(yī)學(xué);1996年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 王海豐;顧千里;梁冰;;腓骨遠端解剖型鎖定鋼板治療外踝骨折50例[A];2013中國工程院科技論壇暨浙江省骨科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文摘要集[C];2013年

2 俞敏;張如南;;小斜T形鋼板內(nèi)固定治療外踝骨折33例[A];2006年浙江省骨科學(xué)術(shù)會議暨浙江省脊柱脊髓學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張曉猛;解剖鎖定鋼板及髓內(nèi)釘治療外踝骨折Danis-weber B及C型骨折比較研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年

2 林炳基;解剖鎖定鋼板與帶鎖髓內(nèi)釘治療外踝骨折的療效比較[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1720463