本文選題：布魯桿菌病　切入點(diǎn)：脊椎炎　出處：《中國(guó)矯形外科雜志》2017年17期

【摘要】：[目的]通過(guò)回顧性比較單純后路與前后路聯(lián)合手術(shù)療效,探討腰椎布病性脊椎炎術(shù)式的選擇。[方法]回顧性分析2007年6月~2015年6月手術(shù)治療獲得完整隨訪的65例腰椎布魯桿菌性脊椎炎患者的臨床及影像學(xué)資料。依據(jù)骨破壞情況、膿腫位置、神經(jīng)損害及影像學(xué)分型,35例采用單純后路椎板減壓病灶清除椎弓根釘固定橫突間植骨融合(單純組),31例行前路病灶清除,同期聯(lián)合后路椎弓根釘固定植骨術(shù)(聯(lián)合組)。比較兩組在手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、疼痛視覺(jué)模擬VAS評(píng)分、Oswestry功能障礙指數(shù)(Oswestry disability index)、ESC、影像學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)、脊柱后凸角(Cobb角)及ASIA評(píng)分改善的差異。[結(jié)果]兩組手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、住院時(shí)間、ESC、脊柱后凸角(Cobb角)比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;影像學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)、VAS評(píng)分、ODI評(píng)分、ASIA評(píng)分比較術(shù)后1周差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,術(shù)后6個(gè)月差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。[結(jié)論]兩種術(shù)式均能有效清除病灶,維持或重建脊柱穩(wěn)定,有利于感染控制。單純后路手術(shù)對(duì)于椎管內(nèi)肉芽及膿腫清除效果較好,更適合中后柱病變特別是椎管內(nèi)神經(jīng)損害者;而前后路聯(lián)合手術(shù)更適合存在椎體周?chē)撃[及腰大肌膿腫或前柱破壞較大病例。臨床中應(yīng)依據(jù)個(gè)性化治療原則,根據(jù)感染浸潤(rùn)情況采取不同手術(shù)方式。
[Abstract]:[objective] to explore the choice of surgical methods for lumbar spondylitis by comparing the curative effect of posterior approach and anterior approach.[methods] the clinical and imaging data of 65 patients with brucellosis of lumbar vertebrae were analyzed retrospectively from June 2007 to June 2015.According to the condition of bone destruction, the location of abscess, nerve damage and imaging classification, 35 cases were treated with posterior lamina decompression.At the same time combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation bone graft (combined group).The time of operation, the amount of blood loss during operation, the VAS score of visual simulation of pain and the index of Oswestry disability were compared between the two groups. The imaging evaluation, the angle of kyphosis angle (Cobb angle) and the improvement of ASIA score were compared between the two groups.[results] there was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, hospitalization time and Cobb angle between the two groups, and there was significant difference in imaging evaluation of VAS score and ODI score and Asia score 1 week after operation.There was no significant difference 6 months after operation.[conclusion] both methods can effectively clear the lesions, maintain or reconstruct the stability of the spine, and be beneficial to the control of infection.Simple posterior approach for the removal of granulation and abscess in the spinal canal is better, more suitable for the lesions of the middle posterior column, especially the nerve damage in the spinal canal.Combined anterior and posterior approach is more suitable for patients with perivertebral abscess, abscess of psoas major muscle or large anterior column destruction.Different operative methods should be adopted according to the principle of individualized treatment and infection infiltration.
【作者單位】： 河北北方學(xué)院附屬第一醫(yī)院脊柱關(guān)節(jié)外科;河北北方學(xué)院;
【基金】：2014年河北省醫(yī)學(xué)重點(diǎn)學(xué)科跟蹤項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):GL2014069) 2016年河北省醫(yī)學(xué)重點(diǎn)學(xué)科跟蹤項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):GL2016069) 2015年河北省政府資助臨床醫(yī)學(xué)優(yōu)秀人才培養(yǎng)和基礎(chǔ)課題研究項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):361009)
【分類號(hào)】：R687.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 趙瑩,祝衛(wèi)琴;癤腫導(dǎo)致脊椎炎并下肢截癱誤診的教訓(xùn)[J];中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師;2002年13期

2 羅佛標(biāo);遲發(fā)性外傷性脊椎炎1例[J];人民軍醫(yī);2004年02期

3 許競(jìng)斌;腰部退化性改變[J];頸肩腰腿痛防治通訊;1984年03期

4 曹鵬;崔泳;詹玉林;;手術(shù)治療化膿性頸脊椎炎[J];頸腰痛雜志;2009年04期

5 邵景范;脊椎炎的MRI鑒別診斷[J];放射學(xué)實(shí)踐;1995年04期

6 白玉貞;韓曉東;牛廣明;;布氏桿菌性脊椎炎的MRI表現(xiàn)[J];臨床放射學(xué)雜志;2012年01期

7 藺鴻儒;張建兵;張鵬飛;韓建秀;;布魯氏桿菌性脊柱炎的MRI診斷[J];醫(yī)學(xué)影像學(xué)雜志;2014年06期

8 譚其仁，，趙麗，李愛(ài)民;兩種動(dòng)態(tài)干擾電流治療腰椎退行性脊椎炎比較[J];中華理療雜志;1996年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 巫陽(yáng)生;吳銀生;林燕萍;;兩種不同方法治療腰椎退行性脊椎炎的臨床研究[A];2012·中國(guó)醫(yī)師協(xié)會(huì)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)師大會(huì)第三次會(huì)議論文集[C];2012年

本文編號(hào)：1716044