【摘要】：目的特比萘芬標(biāo)準(zhǔn)持續(xù)治療方案是治療甲真菌病的經(jīng)典方法,但由于其多個(gè)方面的缺陷,研究者們嘗試了多種其他治療方案。文中擬對(duì)特比萘芬標(biāo)準(zhǔn)持續(xù)治療方案對(duì)比其他方案治療甲真菌病的有效性和安全性進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)。方法計(jì)算機(jī)檢索Pubmed、Cochrane圖書館、EMbase、CNKI、CBMdisc和萬方數(shù)據(jù)庫中關(guān)于特比萘芬治療甲真菌病的隨機(jī)對(duì)照試驗(yàn)(randomized controlled trial,RCT)。由2名研究者按照計(jì)劃書進(jìn)行選擇文獻(xiàn)、提取數(shù)據(jù)、核對(duì),而后進(jìn)行Meta分析。結(jié)果共納入20個(gè)RCT。Meta分析結(jié)果提示,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)持續(xù)治療方案在長(zhǎng)期真菌學(xué)治愈要優(yōu)于沖擊治療方案[P=0.01,RR=0.81(0.69,0.96)]、COMBO方案[P=0.05,RR=0.68(0.46,1.01)]和間歇給藥方案[P=0.0001,RR=0.81(0.73,0.90)]。而標(biāo)準(zhǔn)持續(xù)治療方案在長(zhǎng)期真菌學(xué)治愈方面要亞于持續(xù)治療聯(lián)合局部治療方案[P=0.005,RR=1.19(1.05,1.35)]和持續(xù)治療3月方案[P=0.02,RR=1.12(1.02,1.24)]。對(duì)中-重度甲真菌病患,持續(xù)治療聯(lián)合清創(chuàng)術(shù)方案與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)方案相比有潛在的優(yōu)勢(shì)。在安全性方面,持續(xù)聯(lián)合局部治療方案在胃腸道反應(yīng)發(fā)生低于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)方案[P=0.03,RR=0.24(0.07,0.90)],間歇給藥方案在所有不良事件[P=0.03,RR=0.81(0.67,0.98)]和味覺障礙[P=0.05,RR=0.44(0.19,1.00)]發(fā)生低于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)治療方案。在評(píng)價(jià)研究質(zhì)量方面,根據(jù)Cochrane圖書館推薦的"偏倚風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估"工具評(píng)估后發(fā)現(xiàn)某些高度偏倚可能對(duì)結(jié)果影響較大。結(jié)論特比萘芬治療甲真菌病的最佳治療方案尚待更多高質(zhì)量的RCT來證實(shí)。
[Abstract]:Objective Terbinafine standard continuous therapy is a classic treatment for onychomycosis, but due to its shortcomings in many aspects, researchers have tried a variety of other treatments. The efficacy and safety of terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis were systematically evaluated. Methods A computerized search was conducted for the Pubmed,Cochrane library and (randomized controlled trial,RCT, a randomized controlled trial of terbinafine for the treatment of onychomycosis. According to the plan, two researchers selected documents, extracted data, checked them, and then analyzed them by Meta. Results A total of 20 RCT.Meta analysis showed that the standard continuous therapy regimen was superior to the impact therapy regimen [P0. 01 RRN 0. 81 (0. 69 0. 96)] Combo regimen [P0. 05 RN 0. 68 (0. 46 鹵1. 01)] and intermittent administration regimen [P0. 0001 RRN 0. 81 (0. 73 ~ 0. 90)]. However, the standard continuous therapy regimen was less than that of continuous therapy combined with local treatment (P0. 005 RRN 1. 19 (1. 05 鹵1. 35) and continuous therapy regimen of 3 months [P0. 02 RRN 1. 12 (1. 02 鹵1. 24)] in the long term mycological cure. For moderate-severe onychomycosis patients, continuous therapy combined with debridement has potential advantages over standard protocols. In terms of safety, the incidence of continuous combined local therapy was lower than the standard regimen [P0. 03 RRR 0.24 (0. 07 鹵0. 90)], intermittent administration regimen was lower than the standard treatment regimen in all adverse events [P0. 03 RRR 0. 61 (0. 67 0. 98)] and taste disorder [P0. 05 RR0. 44 (0. 19 鹵1. 00)]. In terms of evaluation of research quality, according to the "bias risk assessment" tool recommended by Cochrane library, it is found that some high bias may have a great impact on the results. Conclusion Terbinafine is the best treatment for onychomycosis and needs more high quality RCT.
【作者單位】： 南京軍區(qū)南京總醫(yī)院皮膚科;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(81071331)
【分類號(hào)】：R756.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張愛軍,劉耿,王永賢,譚升順;特比萘芬治療甲癬的療效觀察[J];中國(guó)皮膚性病學(xué)雜志;1997年04期

2 虞瑞堯,薛文昌;特比萘芬與三唑類抗真菌藥治療甲癬的優(yōu)與劣[J];皮膚病與性病;1998年04期

3 井春梅;特比萘芬致腮腺腫大[J];藥物流行病學(xué)雜志;1999年04期

4 安國(guó)芝,馮冬梅,孟昭影;特比萘芬治療兒童頭癬36例[J];中國(guó)新藥與臨床雜志;2000年S1期

5 曹來安;特比萘芬與咪康唑外用治療嬰幼兒皮膚粘膜念珠菌病的比較[J];中國(guó)麻風(fēng)皮膚病雜志;2001年01期

6 邵永山,任虹,解春桃,余展國(guó);特比萘芬治療兒童頭癬13例[J];中國(guó)麻風(fēng)皮膚病雜志;2001年04期

7 耿文軍,喬少華,趙建華,付吉星,李玉梅;口服特比萘芬治療成人脂溢性皮炎療效觀察[J];中國(guó)皮膚性病學(xué)雜志;2004年05期

8 李連平,王云,丁淑娟;特比萘芬治療真菌皮膚病的臨床療效[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)藥雜志;2005年05期

9 呂小琴;張相彩;;特比萘芬致膽汁淤積型肝炎1例[J];醫(yī)藥導(dǎo)報(bào);2006年06期

10 汪潔;特比萘芬及片劑的紫外分光光度測(cè)定[J];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥工業(yè)雜志;1996年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 高露娟;余進(jìn);矢口貴志;陳偉;李若瑜;;特比萘芬成功治愈誤診為曲霉感染的皮膚利什曼病1例[A];2011全國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2011年

2 王愛平;高那;劉偉;萬U，

本文編號(hào)：2243464