【摘要】：目的對腹腔鏡下結(jié)直腸癌根治術(shù)病人應(yīng)用靶控輸注舒芬太尼與瑞芬太尼復(fù)合麻醉的恢復(fù)情況進(jìn)行比較。方法選取我院收治的86例行腹腔鏡下結(jié)直腸癌根治術(shù)的患者,隨機(jī)分為A、B兩組,給予A組靶控輸注舒芬太尼麻醉,B組則接受靶控輸注瑞芬太尼麻醉。結(jié)果 A組患者的蘇醒時間及導(dǎo)管拔除時間顯著高于B組,但不良反應(yīng)的發(fā)生率則明顯低于B組,組間差異具有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論在腹腔鏡下結(jié)直腸癌根治術(shù)中,靶控輸注舒芬太尼與瑞芬太尼兩種麻醉方法具有各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),因此,在實(shí)際手術(shù)過程中,應(yīng)綜合考慮病人的身體狀況,來選擇更適宜的麻醉方法。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the recovery of target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and remifentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. Methods 86 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer were randomly divided into two groups: group A was anesthetized with sufentanil and group B was anesthetized with target-controlled infusion of remifentanil. Results the recovery time and catheter extraction time in group A were significantly higher than those in group B, but the incidence of adverse reactions in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P 0.05). Conclusion in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and remifentanil have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, in the actual operation, the physical condition of the patients should be considered comprehensively to choose a more suitable anesthetic method.
【作者單位】： 新興縣人民醫(yī)院;
【分類號】：R614;R735.34

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 呂勝;;不同藥物麻醉下行腹腔鏡結(jié)直腸癌根治術(shù)的麻醉恢復(fù)質(zhì)量的比較[J];遼寧醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年05期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 余瀟;右美托咪定在老年患者結(jié)直腸癌根治術(shù)中的臨床應(yīng)用及其對術(shù)后認(rèn)知功能的影響[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

2 葉虹;不同麻醉方法對結(jié)直腸癌根治術(shù)患者應(yīng)激免疫反應(yīng)的影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2511974