本文關(guān)鍵詞： 氣管內(nèi)插管 喉罩麻醉 兒童 下呼吸道感染 影響　出處：《中華醫(yī)院感染學(xué)雜志》2017年17期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的探究氣管內(nèi)插管和喉罩麻醉兩種氣道管理方式對(duì)手術(shù)兒童發(fā)生下呼吸道感染的影響。方法選取2014年1月-2016年1月于醫(yī)院擇期進(jìn)行手術(shù)的106例患兒為研究對(duì)象,分析氣管內(nèi)插管和喉罩麻醉后感染情況;將患兒按照隨機(jī)數(shù)表法進(jìn)行分組,每組各53例;對(duì)照組患兒置入氣管內(nèi)插管,觀察組患兒置入喉罩;術(shù)后3d比較兩組患兒中咳嗽、發(fā)熱、肺部聞及粗濕Up音發(fā)生情況;術(shù)后10min觀察并統(tǒng)計(jì)兩組患兒中恢復(fù)自主呼吸的患兒數(shù)量及比例,術(shù)后20min統(tǒng)計(jì)兩組患兒中拔管患兒數(shù)量及比例;統(tǒng)計(jì)氣管內(nèi)插管和喉罩麻醉后下呼吸道感染發(fā)生情況;采集感染患兒臨床樣本進(jìn)行病原菌培養(yǎng)及鑒定。結(jié)果術(shù)后3d對(duì)照組咳嗽5例(9.43%)、發(fā)熱9例(16.98%)、肺部聞及粗濕Up音6例(11.32%);觀察組咳嗽1例(1.89%)、發(fā)熱3例(5.66%)、肺部聞及粗濕Up音2例(3.77%),兩組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);10min后恢復(fù)自主呼吸患兒數(shù)量及比例為對(duì)照組45例(84.91%),觀察組48例(90.57%);20min后拔管患兒數(shù)量及比例為對(duì)照組24例(45.29%)、觀察組23例(43.40%),兩組比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;106例患兒中共有23例發(fā)生下呼吸道感染,感染率為21.70%;其中對(duì)照組15例(28.30%),觀察組8例(15.09%),兩組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);共檢出病原菌45株,其中革蘭陰性菌34株占75.56%,革蘭陽性菌7株占15.55%,感染病原菌以銅綠假單胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、鮑氏不動(dòng)桿菌為主,分別占31.11%、20.00%、13.33%。結(jié)論氣管內(nèi)插管和喉罩麻醉兩種氣道管理方式均會(huì)引起一定的下呼吸道感染,且氣管內(nèi)插管引起的下呼吸道感染率高于喉罩。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask anesthesia on lower respiratory tract infection in children undergoing operation. The infection after endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask anesthesia was analyzed. The children were divided into three groups according to random number method: 53 cases in each group; 53 cases in the control group were placed in endotracheal intubation and larynx mask was placed in the observation group; 3 days after operation, cough was compared between the two groups. The number and proportion of spontaneous respiration in the two groups were observed and counted 10 minutes after operation, and 20 minutes after operation, the number and proportion of extubation in the two groups were counted. The incidence of lower respiratory tract infection after endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask anesthesia was analyzed. Results three days after operation, 5 cases of cough, 9 cases of fever and 16. 98% of cough in the control group, 6 cases of the lung smell and crude wet up sound, 6 cases of the observation group, 1 case of cough 1.89%, 3 cases of fever 5.66%, the lung smell and coarse wet up, the observation group 1 case of cough, 3 cases of fever 5. 66%, the lung smell and the coarse wet up, the observation group 1 case of cough, 3 cases of fever 5.66%, the lung smell and coarse wet up. There were significant differences between the two groups in the number and proportion of children with spontaneous respiration in the control group (45 cases), in the observation group (48 cases) after 20 minutes, in the control group (24 cases), in the control group (24 cases), in the observation group (23 cases), in the control group (23 cases), in the comparison of the two groups. There were 23 cases of lower respiratory tract infection in 106 cases. The infection rate was 21.70 in the control group (15 cases) and the observation group (8 cases), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). A total of 45 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected, of which 34 strains were Gram-negative bacteria (34 strains), 7 strains were gram-positive bacteria (15.55%), and the pathogenic bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii accounted for 31.11% 20.00% 13.33% respectively. Conclusion endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask anesthesia can cause lower respiratory tract infection, and the infection rate of lower respiratory tract caused by endotracheal intubation is higher than that caused by laryngeal mask.
【作者單位】： 海口市婦幼保健院麻醉科;
【基金】：海南省自然科學(xué)基金資助項(xiàng)目(20158312)
【分類號(hào)】：R726.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王玉嘉,葛春林,王景陽;困難氣管內(nèi)插管的處理[J];醫(yī)學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;1998年11期

2 何錫強(qiáng),劉宿;非氣管內(nèi)插管行小兒唇裂修補(bǔ)術(shù)的呼吸道管理[J];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

3 喻耀華;方向葵;;經(jīng)鼻腔氣管內(nèi)插管在新生兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的應(yīng)用[J];中國醫(yī)藥指南;2008年11期

4 蔡雅雙;新生兒氣管內(nèi)插管護(hù)理[J];福建醫(yī)藥雜志;1996年06期

5 Brenda V.Marcano ,Peter Silver ,Mayer Sagy ,張晶 ,樊尋梅;急性呼吸窘迫綜合征兒童俯臥位時(shí)氣管內(nèi)插管向頭部方向移位的研究[J];中華兒科雜志;2003年08期

6 冉德春魏占軍;;早產(chǎn)兒氣管內(nèi)插管時(shí)的生理變化[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).麻醉學(xué)與復(fù)蘇分冊(cè);1985年06期

7 張東亞,張俊杰,劉進(jìn);小兒經(jīng)鼻腔氣管內(nèi)插管及最佳插管深度的確定[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;1998年06期

8 鄧文良，金淑榮;新生兒窒息復(fù)蘇中用與不用氣管內(nèi)插管的效果比較[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;1995年01期

9 葉祥榮;氣管內(nèi)插管沖洗吸痰術(shù)搶救小兒呼吸衰竭(附八例報(bào)告)[J];九江醫(yī)學(xué);1997年04期

10 蔣善良;吳言悟;張艷;謝郭豪;方向明;;阿托品對(duì)小兒羅庫溴銨氣管內(nèi)插管時(shí)間的影響[J];中國醫(yī)院藥學(xué)雜志;2014年13期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 盧東雪;成丹丹;熊利澤;陳紹洋;孫焱芫;;不同表面麻醉對(duì)嬰幼兒氣管內(nèi)插管并發(fā)癥的療效觀察[A];2009年西部麻醉學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文匯編[C];2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1520348