本文選題：超聲潔牙機(jī) + 視覺(jué)模擬量表��； 參考：《廣東醫(yī)學(xué)》2017年05期

【摘要】：目的比較兩種不同原理潔牙機(jī)的潔治效率以及患者術(shù)中、術(shù)后牙齒敏感情況,探討兩種超聲潔牙機(jī)能否有效地減輕潔治過(guò)程中牙齒的敏感癥狀,縮短牙齒敏感癥狀持續(xù)時(shí)間。方法采用自身對(duì)照、隨機(jī)單盲方法,對(duì)154例牙齦炎患者使用磁致伸縮式超聲潔牙機(jī)及壓電陶瓷式超聲潔牙機(jī)進(jìn)行潔治,對(duì)同一患者左右側(cè)牙采用不同超聲潔牙機(jī)進(jìn)行對(duì)比潔治,檢測(cè)菌斑指數(shù),比較潔治時(shí)間,并使用視覺(jué)模擬量表(VAS)測(cè)量患者在術(shù)中的牙齒敏感程度以及術(shù)后敏感持續(xù)時(shí)間。結(jié)果兩組在潔治術(shù)前(P=0.186)與潔治術(shù)后組間菌斑指數(shù)(PI)比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.217),但兩組分別在潔治前、后PI比較差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.020,P=0.015)。磁致伸縮式與壓電陶瓷式超聲潔牙機(jī)所需的潔牙時(shí)間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.802)。磁致伸縮式超聲潔牙機(jī)在潔治過(guò)程中給患者帶來(lái)的牙齒敏感癥狀要明顯輕于壓電陶瓷式,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.014)。磁致伸縮式超聲潔牙機(jī)在潔牙術(shù)后患者牙齒敏感持續(xù)時(shí)間短于壓電陶瓷式,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.042)。結(jié)論兩種超聲潔牙機(jī)均能較快較好地進(jìn)行潔治工作,使用磁致伸縮式超聲潔牙機(jī)進(jìn)行潔治能有效地減輕潔治過(guò)程中牙齒的敏感癥狀,減少牙齒敏感癥狀持續(xù)時(shí)間。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the cleaning efficiency of the two different principles of the cleaning machine and the sensitivity of the patients during the operation, and to explore whether the two kinds of ultrasonic cleaning machines can effectively reduce the sensitive symptoms of the teeth and shorten the duration of the tooth sensitive symptoms. Methods a self control, random single blind method was used in 154 patients with gingivitis. The telescopic ultrasonic cleaning machine and the piezoceramic ultrasonic cleaning machine were used to clean and treat the same patient's left and right teeth with different ultrasonic cleaning machines, detect the plaque index, compare the cleaning time, and use the visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure the patient's tooth sensitivity and the postoperative sensitive duration. Results two There was no significant difference in the plaque index (PI) between groups before and after cleaning (P=0.186) and after cleaning (P=0.217), but there were statistically significant differences between the two groups before cleaning and after PI (P=0.020, P=0.015). There was no statistical difference between the magnetostrictive and the piezoceramic ultrasonic cleaning machine (P=0.802). In the process of cleaning, the sensitive symptoms of the telescopic ultrasonic cleaning machine should be significantly lighter than the piezoelectric ceramic. The difference has statistical significance (P=0.014). The sensitivity of the patient's tooth sensitivity is shorter than the piezoceramic type, and the difference is statistically significant (P=0.042). Conclusion two kinds of ultrasonic cleaning teeth are found. The machine can perform cleaning faster and better, and the use of magnetostrictive ultrasonic cleaning machine can effectively reduce the sensitive symptoms of teeth in the cleaning process and reduce the duration of dental sensitive symptoms.
【作者單位】： 西南醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬口腔醫(yī)院牙周黏膜科;
【分類號(hào)】：R781

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳萍，胡敏，，陳的毛;正確使用超聲潔牙機(jī)[J];醫(yī)療裝備;1995年06期

2 鞏丹丹;王景潔;李言鳳;熊貴忠;謝昊;;牙周科的環(huán)境噪音及超聲潔牙機(jī)操作者聽(tīng)力狀況的調(diào)查[J];口腔醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2013年06期

3 王健民;辛鵬舉;胡凱;劉學(xué)玲;丁建芬;劉翠梅;;增效型過(guò)氧化氫消毒紙巾對(duì)超聲潔牙機(jī)手柄消毒效果觀察[J];中國(guó)消毒學(xué)雜志;2014年03期

4 王芳云;張建鳳;汝萍;江梅;;超聲潔牙機(jī)手柄消毒方法效果觀察[J];安徽預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

5 孫瑩;章歌雅;;超聲潔牙機(jī)的四手協(xié)作操作流程設(shè)計(jì)與維護(hù)措施[J];醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生裝備;2012年08期

6 王鳳英,姜宏敏;超聲潔牙機(jī)臨床應(yīng)用體會(huì)[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2002年03期

7 徐巖,王勤濤,杜巖,劉玲俠;不同類型超聲潔牙機(jī)臨床療效的對(duì)比評(píng)價(jià)[J];牙體牙髓牙周病學(xué)雜志;2005年04期

8 廖永貴;;基于AD9833的超聲潔牙機(jī)的設(shè)計(jì)[J];山東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2009年06期

9 朱雪明;渦輪高速牙鉆機(jī)及超聲潔牙機(jī)外過(guò)濾器的研制[J];新疆醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年04期

10 侯麗娟;王躍武;駱國(guó)志;;EMS超聲潔牙機(jī)的臨床應(yīng)用與維護(hù)[J];口腔醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2005年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 合肥 李正中;留學(xué)創(chuàng)業(yè)人員：你為誰(shuí)而來(lái)？[N];中國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 白亮;基于ARM的嵌入式超聲潔牙機(jī)檢測(cè)系統(tǒng)的研究與設(shè)計(jì)[D];電子科技大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2097022