本文選題：磨牙 + 根管充填材料��； 參考：《中國(guó)組織工程研究》2016年25期

【摘要】：背景:目前臨床上對(duì)于樁道預(yù)備的時(shí)機(jī)并沒(méi)有達(dá)成一個(gè)共識(shí),不過(guò)從一些研究可以推斷出,樁道預(yù)備時(shí)機(jī)對(duì)經(jīng)不同材料充填的根管會(huì)有一定影響。目的:比較即刻樁道預(yù)備和延遲樁道預(yù)備對(duì)經(jīng)不同材料充填根管冠方微滲漏的影響。方法:將48顆離體人單根單管前磨牙隨機(jī)分為6組,每組8顆:A1組以AH-plus糊劑+牙膠尖充填,行即刻樁道預(yù)備;A2組以礦物三氧化物凝聚體糊劑+牙膠尖充填,行即刻樁道預(yù)備;B1組以AH-plus糊劑+牙膠尖充填,充填1周后行延遲樁道預(yù)備;B2組以礦物三氧化物凝聚體糊劑+牙膠尖充填,充填1周后行延遲樁道預(yù)備;陰性對(duì)照組以AH-plus糊劑+牙膠尖充填;陽(yáng)性對(duì)照組直接以牙膠尖充填。將6組標(biāo)本在模擬口腔環(huán)境中浸泡4周,通過(guò)加壓染料滲透法測(cè)量根管冠方微滲漏的長(zhǎng)度。結(jié)果與結(jié)論:陰性對(duì)照組無(wú)滲漏,陽(yáng)性對(duì)照組微滲漏顯著,涉及整個(gè)根管。A2組和B2組微滲漏值無(wú)差異(P0.05),A1組與A2組微滲漏值無(wú)差異(P0.05),A1組、B2組微滲漏值低于B1組(P0.05)。結(jié)果表明,延遲樁道預(yù)備對(duì)A H-plus糊劑填充根管微滲漏的影響較大。
[Abstract]:Background: there is no consensus on the timing of pile preparation in clinic, but it can be deduced from some studies that the timing of pile preparation will have a certain effect on the root canal filled with different materials. Objective: To compare the effect of immediate pile preparation and delayed pile preparation on the microleakage of root canal filling with different materials. 48 isolated single tube premolars were randomly divided into 6 groups, 8 groups in each group: group A1 was filled with AH-plus paste plus gum tip, and immediate piling was prepared. Group A2 was prepared with mineral three oxide paste and gum tip filling, and immediate post route preparation was carried out; group B1 was filled with AH-plus paste + gum tip, after filling 1 weeks after filling, and B2 group was prepared with mineral three oxygen. After filling 1 weeks, the negative control group was filled with AH-plus paste plus tooth glue tip, and the positive control group was filled directly with gum tip. The 6 groups were soaked in the simulated oral environment for 4 weeks, and the length of the root canal microleakage was measured by the pressure dye penetration method. Results and conclusions: negative and conclusion: negative The microleakage of the group.A2 and B2 group was not different (P0.05), and the microleakage value of group A1 and A2 group was no difference (P0.05), and the microleakage of group A1 and B2 group was lower than that of B1 group (P0.05). The results showed that the delay pile preparation had greater influence on the microleakage of the root canal filled with A H-plus paste.
【作者單位】： 四川西南醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬口腔醫(yī)院口腔修復(fù)科及口頜面修復(fù)重建和再生實(shí)驗(yàn)室;
【分類號(hào)】：R781.05

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂川;胡軍;;口腔修復(fù)體微滲漏的檢測(cè)方法[J];口腔醫(yī)學(xué);2007年10期

2 白雪;伊哲;姜志清;;不同厚度材料封閉冠方根管的微滲漏對(duì)比研究[J];口腔頜面修復(fù)學(xué)雜志;2013年01期

3 張琳;馬雪;朱澌潔;牛玉梅;劉會(huì)梅;李季;;固化光源光照方向和角度對(duì)微滲漏影響的研究[J];口腔醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2013年10期

4 傅柏平;鉭壁處與齦壁處的微滲漏的比較——濕潤(rùn)粘接技術(shù)修復(fù)V類洞洞型[J];口腔醫(yī)學(xué);1999年02期

5 嚴(yán)暉;連文偉;;樁冠微滲漏研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用口腔科雜志;2008年12期

6 安雪銀;王成坤;陳路;;微滲漏發(fā)生原因及其常用檢測(cè)方法的研究進(jìn)展[J];吉林大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2013年06期

7 李季;李艷萍;牛玉梅;;光照角度對(duì)牙體與充填材料間微滲漏影響的研究[J];口腔醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2011年03期

8 王青,李再仁,鄭宗范,凌滌生;四種牙體修復(fù)材料體外充填微滲漏的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];口腔材料器械雜志;1995年04期

9 桂和明;微滲漏的形成與預(yù)防[J];廣東牙病防治;1996年01期

10 熊亞芳;王彤權(quán);田荷花;;表面處理對(duì)全瓷冠修復(fù)體微滲漏的影響[J];臨床口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2007年07期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條

1 李季;李艷萍;牛玉梅;;固化光源光照角度對(duì)牙體與充填材料間微滲漏影響的研究[A];全國(guó)第八次牙體牙髓病學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2011年

2 高燕;楊金玲;呂陶紅;莊沛林;凌均h，

本文編號(hào)：2079909