本文選題：蝶鞍 + 鞍橋��； 參考：《口腔醫(yī)學(xué)研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：目的:比較腭側(cè)埋伏阻尖牙生和尖牙正常萌出患者的蝶鞍大小,檢測(cè)鞍橋和腭側(cè)埋伏阻生尖牙之間是否存在關(guān)聯(lián)。方法:選擇腭側(cè)埋伏阻生尖牙患者的頭顱側(cè)位片作為實(shí)驗(yàn)組,共103例,尖牙正常萌出者作為對(duì)照組,共103例。測(cè)量蝶鞍的長(zhǎng)度、深度、直徑,依據(jù)蝶鞍的鈣化程度將其分為Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ型。結(jié)果:除蝶鞍深度外,蝶鞍長(zhǎng)度、直徑兩組間比較差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。實(shí)驗(yàn)組男性的蝶鞍深度大于女性,蝶鞍長(zhǎng)度及蝶鞍直徑男女無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。而對(duì)照組男性與女性間蝶鞍的大小比較均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。實(shí)驗(yàn)組鞍橋部分和完全鈣化的發(fā)生率分別為41.75%和15.53%,但性別間比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;對(duì)照組鞍橋部分和完全鈣化的發(fā)生率分別為8.73%和4.85%。實(shí)驗(yàn)組鞍橋發(fā)生率是對(duì)照組的8.52倍。結(jié)論:腭側(cè)埋伏阻生尖牙患者的蝶鞍長(zhǎng)度、直徑均較對(duì)照組大,其鞍橋的發(fā)生率顯著增加,但無(wú)性別差異。
[Abstract]:Aim: to compare the size of saddle between palatal impacted canine and normal canine eruption, and to detect the correlation between saddle bridge and palatal impacted canine. Methods: 103 cases of experimental group were selected as experimental group and 103 cases of normal eruption of canine teeth as control group. The length, depth and diameter of Sella turcica were measured and divided into 鈪，

本文編號(hào)：2071510