發(fā)布時間：2018-06-11 14:07

  本文選題：面部側(cè)貌 + 審美評價��； 參考：《重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：研究不同人群對面部側(cè)貌鼻突度、面突度、唇突度的審美評價差異。 方法：按照Holdaway軟組織測量方法選取側(cè)貌軟、硬組織測量值都在中國人正常值范圍內(nèi)的年輕男性和女性各一名，拍攝側(cè)貌照片。 1.使用圖像處理技術(shù)變化鼻突度，使鼻突度各增加2mm，4mm，6mm，，再各減少2mm，4mm，6mm，加上原圖共有男性圖片7張，女性圖片7張，由41名正畸醫(yī)生，43名整形醫(yī)生，41名家長，86名患者，41名普通大眾進(jìn)行美學(xué)評分，以研究不同社會身份、不同性別、不同年齡、不同學(xué)歷人群對鼻突度側(cè)貌審美評價的差異。 2.同樣的處理技術(shù)改變面突度，使之依次增加4。，8。，12。，16。，再將面突度減小4。，8。，12。，16。，加上原圖，得到男性圖片9張，女性圖片9張，請上述相同的人群進(jìn)行美學(xué)評分，以研究不同社會身份、不同性別、不同年齡、不同學(xué)歷人群對面突度側(cè)貌審美評價的差異。 3.同樣的處理技術(shù)改變唇突度，使唇突度各增加2mm，4mm，6mm，再各減少2mm，4mm，6mm，加上原圖，各有男性圖片7張，女性圖片7張，請上述相同的人群進(jìn)行美學(xué)評分，以研究不同社會身份、不同性別、不同年齡、不同學(xué)歷人群對唇突度側(cè)貌審美評價的差異。 結(jié)果 1.鼻突度審美評價分析：人們認(rèn)為男性鼻突度適中（n）得分最高，女性鼻突度偏大（n+6）得分最高；男性和女性的嚴(yán)重鼻部塌陷（n-6）得分最低。不同社會身份人群對男性鼻突度側(cè)貌的評價一致性較好，而對女性鼻突度側(cè)貌的評價有差異：患者家長組和正畸醫(yī)生組對女性側(cè)貌（n，n+4）的評分顯著高于患者組、整形醫(yī)生組、普通大眾組（p0.05）。女性組較男性組對鼻突度增大（n+4）的男性側(cè)貌評分更高（p0.05）。中年組比少年組和青年組對男性和女性側(cè)貌的評分更高（p0.05）。各學(xué)歷組間對側(cè)貌評價無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。 2.面突度審美評價分析：男性和女性面型適中（m）的側(cè)貌得分最高，嚴(yán)重的凸面型（m-16）的得分最低�；颊呒议L組對側(cè)貌為明顯的凸面型（m+12）或者凹面型（m-8）的評分顯著高于其他組（p0.05）�；颊呒议L組和正畸醫(yī)生組對女性面突度適中（m）的評分顯著高于患者組、整形醫(yī)生組、普通大眾組（p0.05）。不同性別組間評分沒有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。中年組較青年組和少年組對男性側(cè)貌（m-8）的評分更高（p0.05），各學(xué)歷組間對側(cè)貌評價無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。 3.唇突度評價評價分析:男性和女性的唇突度適中（c）得分最高，唇部明顯前突（c+6）得分最低。正畸醫(yī)生組對男性唇部前突（c+4）的評分顯著低于其他組（p0.05），同時患者組評分顯著低于患者家長組評分（p0.05）�；颊呒议L組和正畸醫(yī)生組對女性唇突度適中的側(cè)貌（c）的評分顯著高于患者組、整形醫(yī)生組、普通大眾組（p0.05）。與異性相比，男性對唇部中度前突（c+4）的男性側(cè)貌的評分更高（p0.05），而女性對唇部輕度內(nèi)收（c-2）的男性側(cè)貌的評分更高（p0.05）。中年組比青年組和少年組對女性側(cè)貌（c-4）的評分更高（p0.05）。學(xué)歷組間評分沒有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。 結(jié)論：不同社會身份、不同性別、不同年齡人群對鼻突度、面突度、唇突度側(cè)貌審美評價各有差異。不同學(xué)歷對側(cè)貌審美評價的一致性較好。
[Abstract]:Objective: To study the aesthetic evaluation differences of nasal aspect, facial protrusion and lip protrusion in different groups.
Methods: according to the Holdaway soft tissue measurement method, the lateral appearance of the young male and female in the normal range of the Chinese people's normal range was selected.
1. use the image processing technique to change the nasal process, make the nasal process increase 2mm, 4mm, 6mm, and then reduce 2mm, 4mm, 6mm, plus the original picture, there are 7 male pictures and 7 female pictures, and 41 orthodontics, 43 orthodondists, 41 parents, 86 patients and 41 general public to study different social identities, different sexes, different The difference in aesthetic evaluation of nasal aspect and degree was different among different age groups.
2. the same treatment technology change the surface process, make it increase by 4., 8., 12., 16., and then reduce the surface process by 4., 8., 12., 16., plus the original picture, the male picture 9, and the female picture 9, ask the same crowd to carry on the aesthetic score to study the different social identity, the sex, the age and the different educational background. Differences in evaluation.
3. the same treatment technology change the lip process, make the lip process increase 2mm, 4mm, 6mm, and then reduce 2mm, 4mm, 6mm, plus the original map, each with male pictures 7, female pictures 7, please the same people for aesthetic score, to study the different social identity, different sex, different age, different educated people to the lip process of aesthetic evaluation of the lip appearance of people Difference.
Result
1. aesthetic evaluation analysis of nasal process: people think that the moderate (n) score is the highest, the female nasal inrush (n+6) has the highest score, and the severe nasal collapse (n-6) of male and female is the lowest. The evaluation of the nasal process side appearance of male with different social identity is better, but the evaluation of the nasal process side appearance is different in the female: The score of n (n+4) was higher in the parent group and the orthodontic group than in the patient group, the plastic surgeon group and the general public group (P0.05). The male side score of the female group was higher than that of the male group (n+4) (P0.05). The score of the middle age group was higher than the young group and the young group (P0.05). The scores of the male and female side were higher than those in the young group and the young group (P0.05). There was no statistical difference in the evaluation of the contralateral appearance.
The analysis of the aesthetic evaluation of the 2. faces: the male and female face type (m) had the highest side score, and the serious convex type (M-16) had the lowest score. The scores of the prominent convex surface (m+12) or concave type (M-8) in the parents' group were significantly higher than those of the other groups (P0.05). The parents and orthodontic groups of the patients were evaluated for the moderate (m) of the women (m). The score was significantly higher than that of the patient group, the plastic surgeon group and the general public group (P0.05). There was no statistical difference between the different sex groups. The score of the male side appearance (M-8) was higher in the middle age group than the young group and the juvenile group (P0.05), and there was no statistical difference in the evaluation of the contralateral appearance among the various academic groups.
The evaluation and evaluation of the 3. labial protrusion evaluation: the moderate (c) score was the highest in male and female, and the lower lip protrusion (c+6) was the lowest. The orthodontic group was significantly lower than the other group (P0.05) for male lip protrusion (c+4), and the score of the patient group was significantly lower than that of the parent group (P0.05). The parents and orthodontic groups of the patients were in the female group. The moderate lip appearance (c) score was significantly higher than the patient group, the orthopedics group, the general public group (P0.05). Compared with the opposite sex, men scored higher on the male side of the moderate anterior process (c+4) in the lip (P0.05), while the female scores on the male side appearance of the lip mild adduction (C-2) were higher (P0.05). The middle-aged group was more than the young group and the young group. The C-4 score was higher (P0.05). There was no statistical difference between the education group.
Conclusion: different social identities, different sex and age groups have different aesthetic evaluation on the nasal process, the surface process and the lip process. The aesthetic evaluation of the side appearance of different educational background is better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：R783.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 唐國華,嵇國平,丁小軍;上海地區(qū)650人對軟組織側(cè)貌唇突度的審美評價[J];上�？谇会t(yī)學(xué);2003年02期

2 周晨;郭叢叢;王媛媛;范明玲;王偉財;包柏成;;正畸患者對上頜牙列中線軸向傾斜的審美評價[J];實用口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2012年05期

3 呂嬰,張學(xué)軍;中國人顏面?zhèn)让矊徝赖恼{(diào)查分析[J];中華口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2000年03期

本文編號：2005536