本文選題：無(wú)牙頜　切入點(diǎn)：all-on-four　出處：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:臨床研究all-on-four無(wú)牙頜固定義齒的種植及修復(fù)的方法以及與植入相同種植體顆數(shù)的種植覆蓋義齒相對(duì)比,觀察種植體及上部修復(fù)體成功率、種植體牙周健康(包括種植體周圍菌斑指數(shù)及探針出血指數(shù))、咀嚼效率測(cè)定、患者滿意度調(diào)查及種植體周圍骨高度變化6個(gè)方面。方法:臨床收集無(wú)牙頜患者,制作普通全口義齒,如固位力、穩(wěn)定性等不能滿足患者需求,則按照all-on-four術(shù)式制作種植固定義齒修復(fù)或進(jìn)行4顆種植支持覆蓋義齒修復(fù)。將all-on-four固定修復(fù)患者設(shè)為A組,植入4顆種植體行覆蓋義齒修復(fù)患者設(shè)為B組。兩組分別按照如下方法進(jìn)行研究:術(shù)前設(shè)計(jì)及制作CAD/CAM導(dǎo)板,在數(shù)字化導(dǎo)板的引導(dǎo)下A、B兩組分別進(jìn)行種植手術(shù)。A組按照all-on-four術(shù)式將4顆種植體植入患者頜骨內(nèi),24h內(nèi)為患者制作種植體支持式臨時(shí)義齒,經(jīng)過(guò)3-6月的骨結(jié)合后行永久修復(fù)。B組在導(dǎo)板的定位下將4顆種植體植入患者頜骨內(nèi),經(jīng)過(guò)3-6月的骨結(jié)合,制作種植體支持式覆蓋義齒。對(duì)上述A、B兩組患者進(jìn)行臨床觀察:永久修復(fù)1個(gè)月后對(duì)兩組患者分別進(jìn)行滿意度調(diào)查。永久修復(fù)12個(gè)月后對(duì)兩組患者分別進(jìn)行種植體及修復(fù)體成功率、種植體牙周健康(包括種植體周圍菌斑指數(shù)及探針出血指數(shù))、咀嚼效率測(cè)定及種植體周圍骨高度變化的檢測(cè)。結(jié)果:1.按照all-on-four術(shù)式在患者前牙區(qū)植入2顆軸向種植體,遠(yuǎn)中植入2顆傾斜種植體,利用4顆種植體支持的單頜螺絲固位一段式固定橋。只需要種植4顆種植體即可實(shí)現(xiàn)無(wú)牙頜固定修復(fù),減輕患者的手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷及費(fèi)用。在種植手術(shù)當(dāng)天患者即可戴入種植體支持式臨時(shí)義齒,解決了種植體愈合期內(nèi)患者無(wú)牙的情況。提高了患者的生活質(zhì)量。2.永久修復(fù)1個(gè)月后,對(duì)患者進(jìn)行義齒滿意度問(wèn)卷調(diào)查,問(wèn)卷調(diào)查顯示,與植入相同數(shù)目種植體的種植覆蓋義齒相比,all-on-four無(wú)牙頜種植固定修復(fù)在咀嚼、舒適、方便及發(fā)音方面得分高于種植覆蓋義齒,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。3.永久修復(fù)12個(gè)月后,對(duì)兩組患者進(jìn)行種植體及修復(fù)體成功率、種植體牙周健康(包括種植體周圍菌斑指數(shù)及探針出血指數(shù))、咀嚼效率測(cè)定及種植體周圍骨高度變化的監(jiān)測(cè),結(jié)果A、B兩組在種植體及修復(fù)體成功率、種植體牙周健康、種植體周圍骨高度變化方面A、B兩組差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),對(duì)A、B兩組進(jìn)行咀嚼效率測(cè)定結(jié)果顯示A組高于B組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論:1.All-on-four無(wú)牙頜種植修復(fù)技術(shù)只需植入4顆種植體即可實(shí)現(xiàn)無(wú)牙頜固定修復(fù)。2.All-on-four無(wú)牙頜種植修復(fù)技術(shù)與種植體支持式覆蓋義齒修復(fù)相比,得到較高的咀嚼效率和患者滿意度。3.All-on-four無(wú)牙頜種植修復(fù)技術(shù)與種植體支持式覆蓋義齒修復(fù)相比,在種植體及其上部修復(fù)體成功率、種植體牙周健康(包括種植體周圍菌斑指數(shù)及探診出血指數(shù))及種植體周圍骨高度變化方面差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the methods of implant and repair of all-on-four denture and compare with the same number of implants to observe the success rate of implants and upper implants.Implant periodontal health (including plaque index and probe bleeding index), masticatory efficiency measurement, patient satisfaction survey and bone height changes around the implant.Methods: the patients with edentulous jaws were collected clinically, and general complete dentures were made. If the retention and stability could not meet the needs of the patients, the implant fixed dentures or 4 implant-supported overdentures were made according to the all-on-four procedure.Group A was fixed with all-on-four and group B was implanted with 4 implants for overdenture.The two groups were studied according to the following methods: preoperative design and fabrication of CAD/CAM guide plate,Under the guidance of digital guide plate, group A and group A were respectively treated with implant operation. Group A made implant-supported temporary dentures for patients within 24 hours according to all-on-four procedure.Four implants were implanted into the jaws of the patients after 3 to 6 months of bone bonding. The implant-supported overdentures were made in group B under the guidance of the guide plate.The clinical observation was carried out in the above two groups: one month after permanent repair, the satisfaction of the two groups were investigated.After 12 months of permanent restoration, implant and prosthesis success rate, periodontal health (including plaque index and probe bleeding index), masticatory efficiency and bone height around implant were measured.The result is 1: 1.According to all-on-four procedure, two axial implants and two oblique implants were implanted in the anterior teeth of the patients, and 4 implants supported by single jaw screws were used to maintain a fixed bridge.Only 4 implants can be used to repair edentulous jaw and reduce the surgical trauma and cost.Implant-supported temporary dentures can be worn on the day of implant implantation, which solves the problem of dental absence during the healing period of implants.Improved the patient's quality of life.A month after permanent restoration, a questionnaire survey on denture satisfaction showed that the all-on-four dental prosthesis was chewed and comfortable compared with the implant overdenture with the same number of implants.The scores of convenience and pronunciation were higher than that of implant overdenture, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05).After 12 months of permanent restoration, implant and prosthesis success rate, periodontal health (including plaque index and probe bleeding index), masticatory efficiency and bone height around implant were measured.Results there was no significant difference in the success rate of implant and prosthesis, the periodontal health of implant and the change of bone height around implant between two groups (P 0.05). The masticatory efficiency of group A was higher than that of group B (P 0.05), and the masticatory efficiency of group A was higher than that of group B.The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05).Conclusion: 1. All-on-four dental prosthesis can be implemented with only 4 implants. 2. All-on-four dental prosthesis is compared with implant-supported overdenture.Higher masticatory efficiency and patient satisfaction. 3. All-on-four dental prosthesis technology compared with implant-supported overdenture, the success rate of implants and their upper implants,There was no significant difference in periodontal health (including plaque index and bleeding index) and bone height around implant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R783.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬春敏;戴文安;;三種牙合型全口義齒咀嚼效能的比較[J];實(shí)用口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2016年02期

2 李貝貝;林野;崔宏燕;郝強(qiáng);胥加斌;邸萍;;碳纖維增強(qiáng)“All-on-4”即刻修復(fù)體的臨床評(píng)價(jià)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2016年01期

3 劉明蘭;胡曉文;;“All-on-4”即刻種植修復(fù)并發(fā)癥8年追蹤分析[J];中國(guó)口腔種植學(xué)雜志;2015年03期

4 郭樹(shù)琴;王立軍;;數(shù)字化種植外科導(dǎo)板研究新進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)口腔種植學(xué)雜志;2013年04期

5 楊兆軍;陳傳海;陳菲;李國(guó)發(fā);;數(shù)控機(jī)床可靠性技術(shù)的研究進(jìn)展[J];機(jī)械工程學(xué)報(bào);2013年20期

6 鄧飛龍;莊秀妹;;無(wú)牙頜種植修復(fù)長(zhǎng)期成功的因素分析[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用口腔科雜志;2013年01期

7 李守宏;尚政軍;;保持拔牙術(shù)后牙槽窩骨量的研究進(jìn)展[J];現(xiàn)代口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2012年03期

8 安芬菊;梁永回;;快速成型技術(shù)與數(shù)控技術(shù)在手版制作中的應(yīng)用比較[J];機(jī)械制造;2012年02期

9 吳國(guó)鋒;;上頜無(wú)牙頜的面弓記錄與轉(zhuǎn)移[J];實(shí)用口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年05期

10 王太勇;喬志峰;韓志國(guó);董靖川;支勁章;;高檔數(shù)控裝備的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];中國(guó)機(jī)械工程;2011年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王煜婷;All-on-4種植參數(shù)對(duì)骨組織應(yīng)力影響的三維有限元分析[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2014年

2 苗輝;無(wú)牙頜患者種植覆蓋義齒與固定義齒臨床療效對(duì)比研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2014年

3 宋芳;不同上部附著結(jié)構(gòu)的種植全口覆蓋義齒光彈應(yīng)力分析[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1712834