【摘要】：背景:快感缺失最有可能是抑郁癥的內(nèi)表型,對(duì)抑郁癥的治療和預(yù)后具有非常重要的意義,但目前國(guó)內(nèi)評(píng)估抑郁癥患者快感缺失的工具卻比較缺乏。目的:評(píng)估斯奈思-漢密爾頓快感量表(Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale,SHAPS)中文版在抑郁癥患者中的效度和信度。方法:選取166名抑郁癥患者,完成斯奈思-漢密爾頓快感量表(Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale,SHAPS)、貝克抑郁問(wèn)卷第 1 版(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI-I)和漢密爾頓抑郁量表(Hamilton Depression rating scale,HAMD-17)測(cè)試,通過(guò)效標(biāo)效度和探索性因子分析評(píng)價(jià)其效度,通過(guò)內(nèi)部一致性和Pearson相關(guān)分析評(píng)價(jià)其信度。結(jié)果:SHAPS與HAMD-17、BDI-I總分間組內(nèi)相關(guān)系數(shù)(ICC)分別為0.90(P0.001)、0.91(P0.001)。探索性因子分析顯示SHAPS可提取2個(gè)公因子,累積方差貢獻(xiàn)率為62.76%。SHAPS的Cronbach αα系數(shù)為0.94,1周后重測(cè)Pearson相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.91(P0.001),各條目間的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.30～0.93之間,各條目與SHAPS總分的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.61～0.79之間。結(jié)論:斯奈思-漢密爾頓快感量表(SHAPS)中文版具有良好的效度和信度,可在抑郁癥患者快感缺失的相關(guān)研究中使用。
[Abstract]:Background: lack of pleasure is most likely to be the internal phenotype of depression, which is of great significance to the treatment and prognosis of depression. However, at present, there is a lack of tools to evaluate pleasure loss in patients with depression in China. Objective: to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Snakes-Hamilton pleasure scale (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale,SHAPS) in patients with depression. Methods: 166patients with depression were tested with Snyss-Hamilton pleasure scale (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale,SHAPS), Baker Depression questionnaire version 1 (Beck Depression Inventory,BDI-I) and Hamilton Depression scale (Hamilton Depression rating scale,HAMD-17). The validity was evaluated by criterion validity and exploratory factor analysis, and its reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: the intra-group correlation coefficients (ICC) between SHAPS and HAMD-17,BDI-I were 0.90 (P0.001) and 0.91 (P0.001), respectively. Exploratory factor analysis showed that two common factors could be extracted from SHAPS. The Cronbach 偽 coefficient with cumulative variance contribution rate of 62.76%.SHAPS was 0.94, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.91 (P0.001) one week later. The correlation coefficient of each item was 0.30 ~ 0.93, and the correlation coefficient between each item and the total score of SHAPS was 0.61 ~ 0.79. Conclusion: the Chinese version of Snyss-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS) has good validity and reliability, and it can be used in the related study of depression patients with pleasure deficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R749.4
，

本文編號(hào)：2465500