本文選題：焦慮 + 坐忘　； 參考：《醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(B)》2017年09期

【摘要】：采用不同壓力管理策略(坐忘、正念、冥想)考察其對焦慮的干預(yù)效用,并用腦電探究其腦機制差異。首先用焦慮量表篩選出高焦慮被試60名,隨機分入坐忘、正念、冥想和對照組,并對被試實施持續(xù)4周的干預(yù),用焦慮量表進行后測,再采用EEG比較腦電波差異。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):坐忘、正念與冥想都能降低個體的狀態(tài)焦慮,坐忘對降低特質(zhì)焦慮作用更大(t_(TAI)=-3.14,P0.01);坐忘在額葉激活了更高的α波,正念在頂葉激活了更高的θ波,冥想組α波的均值高于對照組。因此,不同的壓力管理策略對焦慮的干預(yù)效用顯著,而且三者的腦電存在差異。
[Abstract]:Different stress management strategies (sedentary, mindfulness, meditation) were used to investigate their intervention effects on anxiety, and EEG were used to explore the difference of brain mechanism. At first, 60 subjects with high anxiety were selected by using anxiety scale. They were randomly divided into sitting and forgetting, mindfulness, meditation and control groups. The subjects were treated with anxiety scale for 4 weeks, then measured with anxiety scale, and then the difference of brain wave was compared by EEG. The study found that sitting forgetfulness, mindfulness and meditation both reduced the individual's state anxiety, and that sedentary forgetfulness had a greater effect on reducing trait anxiety; sitting and forgetting activated a higher alpha wave in the frontal lobe and a higher 胃 wave in the parietal lobe. The mean value of 偽-wave in meditation group was higher than that in control group. Therefore, the intervention effect of different stress management strategies on anxiety is significant, and there are differences in EEG among them.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)教育學(xué)院;
【分類號】：R749.72
，

本文編號：1911299